• Rubel,R. I. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology, Saidpur Cantonment-5311, Bangladesh
  • Uddin,M. K. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi-6204, Bangladesh
  • Islam,M. Z. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi-6204, Bangladesh
  • Rokunuzzaman,M. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi-6204, Bangladesh



Aerofoil, CFD, Lift and Drag Force, Pressure, Velocity Contour

Abstract [English]

NACA 0015 and NACA 4415 aerofoil are most common four digits and broadly used aerodynamic shape. Both of the shapes are extensively used for various kind of applications including turbine blade, aircraft wing and so on. NACA 0015 is symmetrical and NACA 4415 is unsymmetrical in shape. Consequently, they have big one-of-a-kind in aerodynamic traits at the side of widespread differences of their utility and performance. Both of them undergo the same fluid principle while applied in any fluid medium giving dissimilar outcomes in aerodynamics behavior. On this work, experimental and numerical investigation of each NACA 0015 and NACA 4415 is done to decide their performance. For this purpose, aerofoil section is tested for a prevalence range attack of angle (AOA). The study addresses the performance of NACA 0015 and NACA 4415 and evaluates the dynamics of flow separation, lift, drag, pressure and velocity contour and so on.


Download data is not yet available.


Ravikumar T., Prakash, S.B., Aerodynamic analysis of supercritical NACA SC (2)-0714 airfoil using CFD. Int. J. Adv. Tech. Eng. Sci., 02 (2014), Issue 07, 285-293.

Mccroskey, W. J., Kutler, P., Bridgeman, J. O., Status and prospects of computational fluid dynamics for unsteady transonic viscous flows. NASA_NTRS_Archive_19850003729.

Siva, V., Analysis of ground effect on a symmetrical airfoil. Int. J. Eng. Res. App., 5 (2015) Issue 10, (Part - 2), 40-42.

Zerihan, J., Zhang, X., Aerodynamics of a single element wing in ground effect. J. Aircr. 37 (2000), No. 6, 1058-1064. DOI: 10.2514/2.2711. DOI:

Carr, L. W., Mcalister, K. W., Mccroskey, W. J., Analysis of the development of dynamic stall based on oscillating airfoil experiments, NASA TN D-8382, Ames Research Center and U.S. Army Air Mobility R&D Laboratory Moffett Field, Calif. 94035.

Katam, V., Simulation of low-Re flow over a modified NACA 4415 airfoil with oscillating camber, Master’s Thesis, University of Kentucky, 2005, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S., Paper 339.

Wen-Chao, Y., Hui, W., Jian-Ting, Y., Ji-Ming, Y., Characterization of the flow separation of a variable camber airfoil. Chin. Phys. Lett., 29 (2012), No. 4, 04470.

Ragni, D., Ferreira, C.S., Correale, G., Experimental investigation of an optimized airfoil for vertical-axis wind turbines, Wind Energ., (2014). DOI: 10.1002/We.17805.

Garg, P., Soni, N., Aerodynamic investigation of flow field over NACA 4415 airfoil. Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. Tech., 03 (2016), Issue 2, 1506-1512.

Boschetti, P.J., Cárdenas, E.M., Amerio, A., Aerodynamic optimization of an UAV Design. 5th Aviation Technology Integration and Operation, Arlington, Virginia, 2005. DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-7399 DOI:

Umapathi, M., Soni, N., Comparative analysis of airfoil NACA 2313 and NACA 7322 using computational fluid dynamics method. Int. J. Sci. Prog. Res. 12 (2015), No. 4, 193-198.

Spentzos, A., Barakos, G., Badcock, K., Richards, B., Wernert, P., Schreck, S., Raffel, M., CFD investigation of 2D and 3D dynamic stall. 4th Decennial Specialist’s Conference on Aeromechanics, San Fransisco, California, January 21-23, (2004). The American Helicopter Society Int., Inc.

Munday D., Jacoby J., Active control of separation on a wing with oscillating camber. AIAA J. Aircraft, 39 (2002), No. 1. DOI:

Gerontakos, P., Lee, T., PIV study of flow around unsteady airfoil with dynamic trailing-edge flap deflection. Exp. Fluids, 45 (2008), 955-972. DOI:10.1007/s00348-008-0514-4. DOI:

Morshed, K.N., Experimental and numerical investigations on aerodynamic characteristics of savonius wind turbine with various overlap ratios. Master of Science in Applied Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, (2010).

Abbott, I.H., Doenhoff, A.E.V., Stivers, Jr. L.S., Summary of airfoil data. Report No. 824, Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory Langley Field, Va., pp. 1.

Zhang, Y., Igarashi, Y., Hu, H., Experimental investigations on the performance degradation of a low-Reynolds-number airfoil with distributed leading edge roughness. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 4-7 January 2011, Orlando, Florida; AIAA: 1102, (2011). DOI:

Yang, Z., Haan, F. L., Hui, H., An experimental investigation on the flow separation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Jan 8 – 11, 2007, Reno, Nevada AIAA-0275, (2007). DOI:

Llorca, I.B., CFD analysis and assessment of the stability and control of a supersonic business jet. Royal Institute of Technology (Kth), Stockholm, Sweden, (2015).

Chacón Rebollo, T., Lewandowski, R., Mathematical and numerical foundations of turbulence models and applications. Springer, New York, (2014). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0455-6__2.

John D. Anderson, Jr., Computational fluid dynamics, The basics with applications, 1st ed., Tata-Mcgraw Hill: USA, (1995), 3-93.

Weber, J., The calculation of the pressure distribution over the surface of two-dimensional and swept wings with symmetrical aerofoil sections. R. & M. No. 2918, (16,124), A.R.C. Technical, (1956).

Barnard, R.H., Philpott, D.R., Aircraft Flight: a description of the physical principles of aircraft flight. Longman Group Limited; 4th ed.; Essex, England, (2010).

Dinesh K.G., Vignesh K.R., Ajay K.M., Srikanth J. V. R., Soorya P., Numerical investigation of vicious drag reduction using riblets. Adv. Aerosp. Sci. App., 03 (2013), No. 2, 75-82.

Cousin, H. S., Torres, R. F., Zabihian, F., Panta, Y., Design and analysis of fluid flows through PIV and CFD modeling. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE North Central Section Conference; American Society for Engineering Education: Washington, America, (2015).




How to Cite

R. I., R., Uddin, Islam, & Rokunuzzaman. (2017). COMPARISON OF AERODYNAMICS CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0015 & NACA 4415 AEROFOIL BLADE. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(11), 187–197.