CONTENT ANALYSIS OF DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATIONS IN UPPER PRIMARY SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS

Authors

  • Dr. Syed Hasan Qasim Assistant Professor, Department of Teacher Education, SHUATS, Allahabad, India
  • Sudhansu Shekhar Pandey Department of Teacher Education, SHUATS, Allahabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i7.2017.2155

Keywords:

Content Analysis, Iconic, Schematic

Abstract [English]

The present study is an attempt to investigate content analysis of diagrammatic representations in upper primary science textbooks based on diagrammatic typology. The study analyzed the distribution of diagrams in different upper primary science book categories. The sample selected consists of a total number of nine 7th grade physics, chemistry and biology textbooks adopted in three Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (I.C.S.E) schools in the Allahabad, India. Content analysis in this research entails a systematic coding and categorizing of the diagrams, drawings, photos, charts and graphs appeared in upper primary school science textbooks. A great amount of diagrams have been used in the upper primary level of science teaching. On average, there are about 1.20 diagrams in physics, 0.80 diagrams in chemistry & 1.06 diagrams in biology textbooks used per page for the purposes of explaining, presenting or evaluating the scientific domain. The results confirmed that upper primary level of science education demands large quantity of diagrams to facilitate students learning. So content analysis of diagrammatic representations of science textbooks is recommended and teachers should adopt such diagrammatic strategies which increase the level of knowledge of learners. Teachers should teach students through different diagrammatic representations skills and to enhance their academic performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahtineva, A.(2005). Text book analysis in the service of Chemistry Teaching Universitase Scientiarum, 10, 25-33.

Aldossari A.T., Khaldi J.K., M.H. Altarawneh (2016). CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SCIENCE BOOKS FOR UPPER PRIMARY STAGE. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.orgm ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X, Vol.7, No.30.

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A SURVEY OF AUGMENTED REALITY. Presence, 6(4), 355-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

Bale Colin, Neil Taylor and Barend Vlaardingerbroek (2015). “REPRESENTING THE CELL IN DIAGRAMMATIC FORM A STUDY OF STUDENT PREFERENCES.” Volume 61 Number I | March.

Gilbert, J.K. (2007). VISUALIZATION: A META COGNITIVE SKILL IN SCIENCE AND SCIENCE EDUCATION. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed), (pp. 9-28). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Khine M.S. & Liu Y (2016). “CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATIONS “ Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(8), 1937-1951 doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a

Liu, Y., Won M., Treagust (2014). SECONDARY BIOLOGY TEACHERS’ USE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DIAGRAMS FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES. Book of Science Teachers use of visual representations; page 103-121, Publisher-Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_5

LaDue et.al (2015). VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS ON HIGH SCHOOL BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY, EARTH SCIENCE AND PHYSICS ASSESSMENTS. Journal of Science Education and Technology, volume 24, Issue 6, pp818-834.

Miller B.S. et.al (2016). IMPROVING DIAGRAMMATIC REASONING IN MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE USING CONVENTIONS OF DIAGRAMS INSTRUCTIONS. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Aug2016, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p374-390, 17p, 1 Diagram, 8 Charts, 1 Graph.

Singh A.K (2012). Tests, measurements and research methods in behavioural sciences. Bharati Bhawan publishers and distributors.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-31

How to Cite

Qasim, S. H., & Pandey, S. S. (2017). CONTENT ANALYSIS OF DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATIONS IN UPPER PRIMARY SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(7), 474–479. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i7.2017.2155