USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO ANALYZE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS IN TEAM UP IN ENGLISH 1-3 AND GRADE 9 ENGLISH O-NET TESTS

Authors

  • Pornpimon Tangsakul Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand
  • Wachiraporn Kijpoonphol Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand
  • Nguyen Duy Linh Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand
  • Lugsamee Nuamthanom Kimura School of Liberal Arts, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i7.2017.2106

Keywords:

English Textbooks, O-NET Test, Levels of Reading Comprehension Questions, Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 2001, Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy 2001

Abstract [English]

The aim of the study was to use Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 2001 or Anderson & Krathwohl’s Taxonomy 2001 to analyze and compare the levels of reading comprehension questions found in reading parts of Team Up in English 1-3 and Grade 9 English O-NET Tests academic years 2013-2016. This study examined 416 reading comprehension questions from Team Up in English 1-3 and 65 reading comprehension questions from O-NET Tests academic years 2013-2016. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 2001 was used as a framework for analyzing levels of reading comprehension questions. The findings showed that the levels of reading comprehension questions found in Team Up in English 1-3 and Grade 9 English O-NET tests academic years 2013-2016 were similar and were in low levels of reading comprehension questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelrahman, M. S. H. B. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of Bloom’s taxonomy. In Journal of Education and Practice. 5(8), pp.139-151.

Anderson, L. W, Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Rintrich, P. R., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group).

Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). CEN 2015 Analysis of English textbooks and supplementary reading books. In Share My Passion, Share My Thoughts. Retrieved May 1, 2017.

Husprab, P. (2014). The educational development through O-NET Test scores (Master's thesis). Unpublished.

Kaewmala. (2012). Thai education failures – Part 1: Ridiculous O-NET questions. Retrieved: June 19, 2017, from: http://thaiwomantalks.com/2012/02/26/the-sorry-state-of-thai-education-part-1-ridiculous-o-net-questions/

Khorsand, N. (2009). Cognitive levels of questions used by Iranian EFL teachers in Advanced Reading Comprehension Tests. Master’s degree. Iran.

Krammer, H. P. M. (1985). The textbook as classroom context variable. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 1(4), 273 – 278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(85)90015-0

Lan, W. H. & Chern, C. L. (2010). Using revised Bloom's Taxonomy to analyze reading comprehension questions on the SAET and the DRET. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 18(3), 165-206.

Ministry of Education (2008). The basic education core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from http://www.act.ac.th/document/1741.pdf

Muchlis (2015). An analysis of thinking order of reading comprehension questions in English textbook for young foresters of Forestry Vocational School of Samarinda. Journal Nalar Pendidikan, 3(1). 314-316.

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (NIETS). (2015). Retrieved from http://www.niets.or.th/uploads/content_pdf/7-2558-.pdf.

Nissaipan, N. et al. (2015). The study of O-NET Tests by Supervision, Monitoring and Evaluation for Educational Group.

Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to think, thinking to learn: Models and strategies to develop a classroom culture of thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownhow.

Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

TESOL: Using textbooks effectively (2017, April 29). In Ontesol. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from http://how-to-teach-english.ontesol.com/tesol-using-textbooks-effectively/

[16] Veeravagu, J., Muthusamy, C., Marimuthu, R., & Subrayan, A. (2010). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to gauge students' reading comprehension performance. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 205-212.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-31

How to Cite

Tangsakul, P., Kijpoonphol, W., Duy Linh, N., & Kimura, L. N. (2017). USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO ANALYZE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS IN TEAM UP IN ENGLISH 1-3 AND GRADE 9 ENGLISH O-NET TESTS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(7), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i7.2017.2106