FORECASTING ELECTIONS: DO PREDICTION MARKETS TELLS US ANYTHING MORE THAN THE POLLS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i5.2017.1834Keywords:
Voting Behaviour/ Choice, Election Forecasting, Opinion Polls, Prediction MarketsAbstract [English]
Election forecasting is an expanding domain within political science, moving from the outer edges (as a novelty pursued by a few ‘quants’) toward the mainstream of the discipline. Amongst the most high profile of election forecasting techniques are prediction markets and vote-intention polls. While the weight of scholarly opinion appears to favour prediction markets over polls for election forecasting, there remain challengers and critics.
This article joins with the challengers and the critics, looking at whether this ‘horse race’ competition between election forecasting approaches is valid. Using data from the 2013 Australian federal election, we conclude such comparisons-of-forecasts are misplaced in the Australian context, as prediction markets and vote-intention polls appear to be independent of each other given information from one appears to have no impact on the other.
Downloads
References
Aylmer, Chris and Gill, Troy. (2003). “BUSINESS SURVEYS AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY”, Research Discussion Paper 2003-01, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney. DOI: rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2011/dec/2.html.
Berg, Joyce, Forsythe, Robert, Nelson, Forrest, and Rietz, Thomas. (2003). “RESULTS FROM A DOZEN YEARS OF ELECTION FUTURES MARKET RESEARCH”, unpublished monograph, University of Iowa. DOI: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.15.5409.
Erikson, Robert, and Wlezien, Christopher. (2008). “ARE POLITICAL MARKETS REALLY SUPERIOR TO POLLS AS ELECTION PREDICTORS?” Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 190 -215. DOI:10.1093/poq/nfn010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn010
Forsythe, Robert, Nelson, Forrest, Neumann, George, and Wright, Jack. (1992). “ANATOMY OF AN EXPERIMENTAL POLITICAL STOCK MARKET” American Economic Review, 82, 1142 -1161. DOI: www.jstor.org/stable/2117471.
Forsythe, Robert, Reitz, Thomas, and Ross, Thomas. (1999). “WISHES, EXPECTATIONS AND ACTIONS: PRICE FORMATION IN ELECTION STOCK MARKETS” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 39, 83 – 110. DOI: PII: S0167-2681(99)00027-X.
Gurkaynak, Refet, and Wolfers, Justin. (2005). “MACROECONOMIC DERIVATIVES: AN INITIAL ANALYSIS OF MARKET-BASED MACRO FORECASTS UNCERTAINTY AND RISK”, Discussion Paper 1899, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. DOI: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11929.
Kou, Song, and Sobel, Michael. (2004). “FORECASTING THE VOTE: A THEORETICAL COMPARISON OF ELECTION MARKETS AND PUBLIC OPINION POLLS” Political Analysis, 12, 277 – 295. DOI:10.1093/pan/mph019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph019
Leigh, Andrew, and Wolfers, Justin. (2006). “COMPETING APPROACHES TO FORECASTING ELECTIONS: ECONOMIC MODELS, OPINION POLLING AND PREDICTION MARKETS”, Discussion Paper 1972, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. DOI: hdl.handle.net/10419/33137.
Rhode, Paul, and Stumpf, Koleman. (2005). “MANIPULATION IN POLITICAL STOCK MARKETS: A FIELD EXPERIMENT AND A CENTURY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA”, Unpublished Monograph, Department of Economics, University of Arizona. DOI: unc.edu/~cigar/papers/ManipNBER.pdf.
Snowberg, Erik, Wolfers, Justin and Zitzewitz, Eric. (2012). “PREDICTION MARKETS FOR ECONOMIC FORECASTING”, Discussion Paper 6720, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62505.
Tziralis, Georgios, and Tatsiopoulos, Ilios. (2007). “PREDICTION MARKETS: AN EXTENDED LITERATURE REVIEW” Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 75 – 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v1i1.421
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v8i2.889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v8i2.889
Wolfers, Justin and Leigh, Andrew. (2002). “THREE TOOLS FOR FORECASTING FEDERAL ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM 2001” Australian Journal of Political Science, 37, 223 – 240. DOI: 10.1080/10361140220148115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140220148115
Wolfers, Justin and Zitzewitz, Eric. (2004). “PREDICTION MARKETS”, Discussion Paper 03-25, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University. DOI: siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/03-25_0.pdf.
Wolfers, Justin and Zitzewitz, Eric. (2006). “PREDICTION MARKETS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE”, Discussion Paper 1991, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. DOI: hdl.handle.net/10419/33384.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
