DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP AMONG THE COLLEGE PRINCIPALS

Authors

  • Dr. C.Subathra Assistant Professor of Commerce,Pioneer Kumaraswamy College, Nagercoil -3, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i7(SE).2016.2623

Keywords:

Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-Faire, Leadership Style

Abstract [English]

The study investigates the Leadership style of college principals in Kanyakumari District.  Researches on managers (formal leaders) in different settings suggest that Leadership style, managerial decision-making style, and Motivation profile are the three important factors for managerial effectiveness (Bass, 1990). The study surveyed 130 college principals (51 males and 79 females) in Kanyakumari District. Applied frequency, percentage analysis, Mean and SD to explore the Leadership style of the College Principals in Kanyakumari District using SPSS.  The findings of the study reveal that most of the College Principals in Kanyakumari District lead their college in Democratic way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ash, Ruth. & Maurice, P.,(2001) The Principal as Chief Learning Officer: The New Work of Formative Leadership.

Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full Leadership Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. www.mlq.com.au/position_feature_article.asp

B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership, (3rd ed). New York: Free Press.

Bales, R. F. (1970). Interaction process analysis. Mass: Addison Wesley, 509.

Bartol, K. M., & Martin, D. C. (1986). Women and men in task groups. In R.D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female– male relations (pp. 259–310). Orlando, FL: Academic.

Bass, B. M. (1985a). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation. New York: Free Press.

Bass, B. M., &Avolio, B. J. (1994). Introduction in Bass, B. M., &Avolio, B. J. (Eds). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership, (pp 1-10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Beck, T., P. Behr, A. Guettler (2013). Gender and Banking: Are Women Better Loan Officers? Review of Finance. 17: 1279–1321.

Cheaupalakit, Panpim, (2002), The leadership styles of male and female higher education administrators in Thailand. Ph.D., Illinois State University.

Chliwniak, L. (1997). Higher education leadership: Analyzing the gender gap. ASHE–ERIC Higher Education Report, 25.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) Stress, social support and offering hypothesis. Psychology Bulletin, 310-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. New York: Harper Business.

Eagly, A.H. & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233

Golden, S. A. R. (2011). Problems and Prospectus of Distance Learning. Bharathidhasan University, 343, 344.

Golden, S. A. R. (2011). Strategy For Success Of Human Beings:-Time Management. Department Of BBA, St. Joseph’s College, Trichy, 388-390.

Joshi, J., &Tomar, A. (2003). Leadership in Women, University News, Vol. 41(09), March 3-9, p. 2-4.

Kothari, C.R., “Research Methodology - Methods and Techniques”, New Age International Pvt., Publisher, 2006.

Lewin, K., Lipitt. R., & White, R. K. (1939).Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Social Climate, The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271- 299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366

Subathra, C. Decision making style of college principals in Kanyakumari district, International Research Journal of Management and Humanities, Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2014, ISSN No.2347-3274, Pg no.103-113 – Siddharaja Publications.

Subathra, C. Leadership style of college principals in Kanyakumari district – A study, The International Journal for Economics and Business Management, ISSN No.2250-2750, June 2015, Volume 4, Issue 2, and Pg.No.61-68.

Subathra, C. Leadership Style of Higher Education Leader, Published in “Education in India: Challenges and Perspectives” a Vergal Publications, ISBN No. 978-93-85109-03-4, Pg no. 345-348, March 2015.

Subathra, C. The relationship between principals’ Leadership style and Demographic profile, publications in B-Digest, Contemporary Business Conundrum, Oct 2014, ISBN No.:978-93-84734-04-6, Pg 65-69.

Sutherland, M. B. (1999). Gender equity in success at school. International Review of Education, 45, 431–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003862605244

Thompson, M. D. (2000). Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness: Testing the theoretical models of Bolman, Deal, and Quinn. Sex Roles, 42, 969–993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007032500072

Downloads

Published

2016-07-31

How to Cite

Subathra. (2016). DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP AMONG THE COLLEGE PRINCIPALS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 4(7(SE), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i7(SE).2016.2623