THE IMPACT OF EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES ON PRODUCING FAST AND GOOD LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i1.2017.1691Keywords:
Impact, Effective Teaching Strategies, Learning OutcomesAbstract [English]
This study aimed to find out the impact of effective teaching strategies on producing fast and good learning outcomes. It also aimed to determining the role of the study variables (the place graduation, the college where he taught in, the number of published research, the number of conferences and workshops , participation in the Good Samaritan program, teaching experience and academic rank) in producing fast and good Learning outcomes. To achieve these purposes, the researcher used a 25- item questionnaire distributed among lecturers at An-Najah National University. Additionally, the researcher interviewed five lecturers randomly selected from the same faculties at An-Najah National University as well.
The data were collected and analyzed using SPSS to answer the questions of the study. The researcher found out that there was positive impact of effective teaching strategies on producing good and fast learning outcomes. Also, the results showed that there were no statistical significant differences at (α = .05) in the impact of effective teaching strategies on producing fast and good learning outcomes due to the study variables. Based on these findings, the researcher recommended the lecturers to use effective teaching strategies via continual improvement and updating their teaching strategies.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L.W. (2004). Increasing teacher effectiveness. 2nd edition. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO http://www.unesco.org/iiep.
Angelo, T., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bain, K. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Beishuizen, J; Hof, E.; Putten, C; Bouwmeester, S and Asscher, J.(2001) Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 185–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158451
Borich, G. D. (2000). Effective teaching methods. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chen, Y. & Hoshower, L.B. 2003. "Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: an assessment of student perception and motivation." Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(1): 71-88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301683
Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3-7.
Day, C. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge Falmer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464342
Eble, K. (1988). The craft of teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gallagher, T.G. 2000. "Embracing student evaluations of teaching: a case study." Teaching Sociology 28, 140-147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1319261
Gatto, John Taylor. (2000). A Different Kind of Teacher: Solving the Crisis of American Schooling. Reflections on the bitter lessons of the American Systems. Berkeley Hills Books. ISBN 1-893163-21-0.
Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Craner, J., Lim, B., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). Teaching in a Web-based distance learning environment: An evaluation summary based on four courses. Centre for Research on Learning and Technology Technical Report No. 13-00. Indiana University Bloomington. Retrieved September 18, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://crlt.indiana.edu/publications/crlt00-13.pdf
Grasha, A. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance.
Grzega, Joachim and Schoener, Marion. (2007)"The Didactic Model LdL (Lernendurch Lehren) as a Way of Preparing Students for Communication in a Knowledge Society." Journal of Education for Teaching 34 (3): 167-175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470802212157
Grzega, Joachim (2005a), “Learning by Teaching: The Didactic Model LdL in University Classes,”http://www.grzega.deorhttp://www.ldl.de/ material/berichte/uni/uni.htm.
Hay McBer (2000). Research into Teacher Effectiveness: A Model of Teacher Effectiveness. A report by Hay McBer to the Department of Education and Employment, United Kingdom.
Hativa, N. 1995. "The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: a qualitative evaluation." Research in higher education 36(4): 377-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207904
Hiebert, J. & Grouws, D. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students’ Learning. In Lester, F.K., Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (371-404). New York: MacMillan.
Hoyt, D.P. &Pallett, W. H. 1999. "Appraising teaching effectiveness: beyond student ratings." IDEA Paper # 36
Hobson, S. M. & Talbot, D. M. 2001. "Understanding student evaluations: what all faculty should know?" College Teaching 49(1): 26-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550109595842
Hoyt, D.P. &Pallett, W. H. 1999. "Appraising teaching effectiveness: beyond student ratings." IDEA Paper # 36
Johnson & Ryan 2000. "A comprehensive approach to the evaluation of college teaching." New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no.83. Fall 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8309
Jossey-Bass, (2004) Teacher Leadership. Teaching Methods: Demonstrations. National Board Certified Digital Edge Teachers. Lieberman, Ann. California. USA
Kulik, J.A. 2001. "Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy." New Directions for Institutional Research 109, 9-25.
McKeachie, W. 1997. "Student ratings; the validity of use." American Psychologist v52, no.11, 1218-1225.
McKeachie, W. and Svinicki, M. 2006. McKeachie’s. Teaching Tips. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company
Ory, J. 2000. "Teaching evaluation: past, present, and future." New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no.83, Principles for good practice in undergraduate education: Faculty inventory. (1989). Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation, Inc.
Raba, A. A. A. M. & Harzallah, H. T. M. (2015). Effective teaching from An-Najah National University M.A. Students’ perspectives. Journal of Languages and Culture, 6(6), 52 - 60.
Raymond, S. Marguerite. (2008) Effective and Ineffective University Teaching from the Students’ and Faculty’s Perspectives: Matched or Mismatched Expectations? Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. University of Exeter.
Siegel, E (1975). Good Will Is Aesthetics. In The Right of Aesthetic Realism to Be Known, issue no. 121, 23
Sojka, J., Gupta, A.K. & Deeter-Schmetz, D.R. 2002. "Student and faculty perception of student evaluations of teaching: a study of similarities and differences." College Teaching 50(2): 44-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595873
Theall, M. & Franklin, J. 2001. "Looking for bias in all the wrong places: a search of truth or a witch hunt in student ratings of instruction?" New Directions for Institutional Research 109: 45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.3
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher Professional Development: an international review of the Literature. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
Walls, R.T., Nardi, A. H., von Minden, A.M., & Hoffman, N. (2002). The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers. Teacher Educational Quarterly, winter, 29(1), 39-48.
Weimer, Maryellen (2013) Essential Teaching Principles: A Resource Collection for Adjunct Faculty. Magna Publications. 2718 Dryden Drive. Madison. WI53704. Magnaub.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
