PHYSICO-CHEMICAL EVALUATION OF TOMATO HYBRID DERIVATIVES FOR PROCESSING SUITABILITY

Fikreyohannes GedamuMihretu; M.N. Bhalekar

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i3.2016.2795

Authors

FikreyohannesGedamuMihretu School of Plant Sciences,Haramaya University, P.O.B. 56, ETHIOPIA
M.N. Bhalekar Mahatma Phule Agricultural University,Rahuri, 413 722 Dist. Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i3.2016.2795

Keywords:

Biochemical Composition, Cross, Fruits, Generation(S), Progenies

Abstract [English]

Investigation was carried out to evaluate F5 and F6 generations of tomato hybrid derivatives for its physicochemical characters and its suitability for processing during spring-summer 2009/10 and 2010/11 at Vegetable Research area, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri. F5 and F6 generations of two crosses (M-3-1 x H-24 and 87-2 x 18-1-1) and two standard checks (‘Bhagyashree’ and ‘Dhanashree’) were evaluated for processing suitability in randomized block design in three replications. There were significant differences in all the fruit physical characters studied. Significantly highest polar and equatorial diameters, shape index of fruit, pericarp thickness were recorded in both F5 and F6 generation. Biochemical composition and processing qualities of tomato genotypes in both F5 and F6 generations showed significant differences except fruit juice per cent in F6 generation. Major processing quality characters maximum recorded in F5 and F6 generations were: total soluble solids, 5.03 (T18) and 5.17oBrix (T27); titratable acidity 0.6 per cent (T13) and 0.68 per cent (T24); low pH, 4.07 (T21) and 4.07 (T6); maximum ascorbic acid, 36.27 (T26) and 32.93 (T32) mg/100 g; fruit total sugars, 3.72 per cent (T6) and 3.71 per cent (T26); maximum lycopene in T26 , which was 5.95 and 4.23 mg/100 g; β-carotene, was highest in T32, 2.97 and 2.94 mg/100 g in F5 and F6 progenies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adsule P.G. Amba, D., Tikko S.K., and Pal, A.B. Studies on the Evaluation of Tomato Cultivars for Making Juice. Indian Food Packer, Vol 34 No.1, 1980, 18-20.

A.O.A.C. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15thed. Washigton, D.C.1990.

Balasubramanian, T. Studies On Quality and Nutritional Aspects of Tomato. J. Food Sci. Technol. 21, 1984, 419-421.

Benal, B.P., Madalageri, M.B. and Rokhade, A.K. Physico-Chemical Qualities of Fruits of Commercial Tomato Hybrids and Varieties in Ghatprabha Left Bank Command Area Processing In To Puree. J. Food Sci. and Technol, Vol. 42 No. 1, 2005, 8-11.

Chakraborty, I., Vanlalliani.,Chattopadhyay A. and Hazra P. Studies On Processing and Nutritional Qualities of Tomato as Influenced by Genotypes and Environment. Veg. Sci. Vol. 34 No. 1, 2007, 26-31.

Dar, R.A. and Sharma, J.P. Genetic Variability Studies of Yield and Quality Traits in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet. Vol. 5, 2011, 168-174. Http://Scialert.Net/Abstract/103923.Ijpbg.2011.168.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.168.174

Garande, V.K. Evaluation of Orange Fruited Tomato Cultivars for Beta Carotene Content in Fresh Fruit and Processed Product. PhD. Thesis Submitted To Mahatma PhuleKrishiVidyapeeth, Rahuri .2006.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. Statistical Procedures For Agricultural. 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. UK. 1984.

Hossain, M.E., Alam, M. J., Hakim, M.A., Amanullah, A.S.M., and Ahsanullah, A.S.M. An Assessment of Physicochemical Properties of Some Tomato Genotypes and Varieties Grown at Rangpur. Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. Vol.4, No. 3, 2010, 235-243.

Http://Www.Bdresearchpublications.Com/Admin/Journal/Upload/09180/09180.Pdf

Kalra, R. And Nath, N. Effect of Variety on Morphological and Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Tomatoes. Beverage and Food World, Vol.19, No. 4, 1992, 26-27.

Kaur, G., Jaiswal, S.P., Kanwar, J.S. and Nandpuri, K.S. Variability in Certain Physico-Chemical Characters of Tomato. Indian Food Packer, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1976, 5-9.

Mane, R., Sridevi, O.,Salimath, P.M., Deshpande, S.K., Khot, A.B. Performance Stability of Different Tomato Genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol .80 No. 10, 2010, 898-901.

Radzevicius,A., Karkleliene, R., Bobinas, C., and Viskelis, P. Nutrition Quality of Different Tomato Cultivars. Zemdirbyste-Agric., Vol. 96, No. 3, 2009, 67-75.

Http://Www.Lzi.It/Tomai/96(3)Tomas/96-3tomas-67-75.Pdf.

Raina, B.L., Kalra, C.L.,Teotia, M.S., Rodrigues, R.,Nandpuri, K.S., Kanwar, J.S. and Singh, S.1980. Studies on Suitability of Some Tomato Varieties for Canning.Veg.Sci., Vol. 7, No. 1, 1980,60-66.

Randhawa, K.S., Saimbhi, M.S., and Gill, B.S. Commercial Evaluation of Tomato Varieties for Processing. Veg. Sci. Vol.15, No. 2, 1988, 181-184.

Ranganna, S. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. 2nd Eds., Tata Mcgraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi.1986.

Ringane, N.B. Evaluation of Tomato Cultivars for Processing Quality. M.Sc. Thesis. Mahatma Phule Agricultural University. 1992.

Roy, S.K. And Choudhary, B. Studies On Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Few Varieties of Tomato in Relation to Processing. J. Food Sci. Tech.,Vol. 9, No. 3, 1972, 151-153.

Sandhu, K.S., Cheema, D.S. and Singh, S. Studies on The Varietal Difference in Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Some Tomato Varieties. Beverage and Food World, Vol.17 No. 1, 1990, 34-35.

Sestras A., Jidavu, M., Sestras, R., Apahidean, M., Harsan, E., Tamas E. and Gao, Y. The Response of Several Tomato Cultivars for Processing in Central Transylvania Conditions II. Fruit Quality. 2006.

Http://Www.Notulaebotanicae.Ro/Nbha/Article/Viewfile/276/268.

Sharma A.,Malhotra, S.R., Modgil, R. and Bhama, S. Tomato as a Nutrient Powerhouse and Most Widely Grown Vegetable in the World, Indian Food Pack.Vol. 2, No.9, 2008, 18-19.

Shibli, R.A., Ereifej, K.I.,Ajlouni, M.A. and Hussain, A. Evaluation of Thirteen Open Pollinated Cultivars and Three Hybrids of Tomato. II. Physical Properties and Chemical Composition of Fruits. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol.32, No. 2, 1995, 225-234.

Http://Pakjas.Com.Pk/Upload/88872.Pdf

Swamy, K.R.M. and Sadashiva, A.T. Tropical Vegetable Crops. In: Peter, K.V. And Abraham, Z. (Eds.) Biodiversity in Horticultural Crops.Vol. I. Daya Publishing House, India. 2007, 109-183.

Tiwari, R.N.,Mishra, M., Choudhury, B. and Palai, S.K. Tomato. In: T. K. Bose,J. Kabir, T. K. Maity,V.A. Parthasarathy and M.G. Som (Eds.),Vegetable Crops .Vol. I. Third Ed. NayaProkash Publishing, India. 2002, 1-154.

Turhan, A. and Seniz, V. Estimation of Certain Chemical Constituents of Fruits Of Selected Tomato Genotypes Grown In Turkey. Afr. J. Agric. Res.Vol. 4, No. 10, 2009, 1086-1092. Http://Www.Ademicjournals.Org/Ajar/Pdf/202009/Oct/Turhnandsentz.Pdf.

Wagh, R.S. Morpho-Physiological and Nutritional Assessment of Somatic Hybrid Derivatives of Tomato. PhD. Thesis, Submitted to Mahatma PhuleKrishiVidyapeeth, Rahuri (Maharashtra) India.2002.