YIELD PERFORMANCE AND ADAPTATION OF DESI CHICK PEA VARIETIES IN SELECTED DISTRICTS OF WOLAYTA AND HADIYA ZONES OF SOUTH ETHIOPIA

Authors

  • Yasin Goa Areka Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box 79, Areka, ETHIOPIA
  • MathewosAshamo Areka Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box 79, Areka, ETHIOPIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i3.2016.2783

Keywords:

Adaptation, Chickpea, Desi, Farmer’s Preferences, On Farm Evaluation, Released Varieties, Yield

Abstract [English]

The experiments were conducted on station and on farm in three districts of Wolayta and Hadiya Zones, south region, Ethiopia, to evaluate the adaptation and yield, assess farmer’s preferences of desi chick pea varieties  to this agro ecological Zones during 2004/05 Meher Season. Data on plant height, hundred seed weight, pod per plant, days to flowering, days to maturity and grain yield were recorded. Five released varieties namely worku, Akaki, Mariye, Dubie, Dz-10-11 and local checks of respective locations were planted on 4.8m2 plots at spacing of 30cm*10cm. The trials were laid in randomized complete block design with three replications. Twelve farmers from three districts at four villages’ three farmers at each village were participated in conducting on farm trials with each farmer as a replicate. There were significant differences among varieties for grain yield and some of traits.  The varieties Akaki and worku were superior yielded overall to the standard and local check across villages ’and on stations. Thus, Akaki and worku out yielded other varieties and had average yields of 1440.95 kg/ha and 1434.75kg/ha at on station and similar trends on farm. The combined statistical analysis and farmers assessments revealed Akaki and worku out yielding other varieties which were also selected by farmers and researchers as the most preferred varieties’. It is therefore recommended that worku and Akaki which had higher yields be promoted for cultivation in the selected districts of south Ethiopia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AbebeG,AssefaT.harrun H.,Mesfin T.,Al-tawaha AM(2005).Participatory selection of drought tolerant maize varieties using mother and baby methodology: case study in the semi arid zones of the centeral rift valley of Ethiopia .World J.Agri.Scie.1:22-27.

Akcin A (1988). Edible pulses publications of Agril.Faculty of selcuk university No:8konya-Turkey(in Turkish).

Anonymous (2006). FAO web page(WWW.fao.org)

Assefa T, Abebe G, Fininsa C, Tesso B, Al-Tawaha ARM (2005) Participatory bean breeding with women and small holder farmers in eastern Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. 1: 28-35.

Bicer B.T., Toncer O., 2012. Plant populations’ densitiesand seed size interaction in chickpea (CicerarietinumL.). SelcukTarimveGidaBil. Der., 26 (2), p. 18-24.

Canci H., Toker C., 2009. Evaluation of Yield Criteriafor Drought and Heat Resistance in Chickpea (CicerarietinumL.). J. Agronomy & Crop Science. 195, p.47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00345.x

CSA (Central Statistical Authority of Ethiopia) 2006/7. Agricultural sample survey meher season 2006/7: Statistical report on area and production of crops, farm management practices, farm implements, machineries and storage mechanisms. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

GeletuBejiga and YadetaAnbessa 1992/93. Nile valley regional program on cool season food legumes: Annual Repor, Evaluation of local and exotic desi chick pea germplasm for adaptation to the mid and highlands areas. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Pp.106-107

Gowda BTS, Halaswamy BH, Seetharam A, Virk DS, Witcombe JR (2000). Participatory approach in varietal improvement: A case study in finger millet in India. Curr. Sci. 79: 366-368.

Ines C. Gonzales and Fernando R. Gonzales.2014.Yield Performance of Chickpea (Cicer

arietanumL.) Varieties across Locations of the Philippines Cordillera Region. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN 2229-5518.pp. 1548-1554.

KaterjiN,Van Hoorn JW,HamdyA,MastrorilliM,OwiesT,MalhotraRs(2001).Response to soil salinity of chick pea varieties differing in drought tolerance .Agri.water mange,50:83-96

KeneaYadeta (2001). On farm Analysis of Improved chick pea production technologies in East shoa ,Ethiopia.In:in The proceeding of the 10th conference of the crop society of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia between 19th and 21st June 2001.Pp.215-223.

Mekbib, F. (2006).Farmers and formal breeding of sorghum (sorghum bicolor (L.)Moech) and the implication for integrated plant breeding .Euphytica 152,163-176.

Muehlbauer F.J., Tullu A. 1997. CicerarietinumL.New Crop Fact SHEET. Center for New Crops &Plant Products, Purdue Univ

TuloleL.Bucheyeki, ErastoM.Shenkalwa, TheoforaX.Manpunda, Leah W.Matata.2008. On farm evaluation of promising ground nut varieties for adaptation and adoption in Tanzania. African Journal of Agricultural Research, University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Academic journals,vol.3,No.8,pp.531-536

TuloleL.Bucheyeki, ErastoM.Shenkalwa, TheoforaX.Manpunda,Leah W.Matata.2010. yield performance and adaptation of four sorghum cultivars in Igunga and Nzega districts of Tanizania.International Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw university of life sciences ,Poland. Communication in Biometry and crop scinece,vol.5,No.1,pp.4-40

Downloads

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Goa, Y., & Ashamo, M. (2016). YIELD PERFORMANCE AND ADAPTATION OF DESI CHICK PEA VARIETIES IN SELECTED DISTRICTS OF WOLAYTA AND HADIYA ZONES OF SOUTH ETHIOPIA. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 4(3), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i3.2016.2783