EFFICACY OF PHRAGMITE KARKA PLANT IN CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEM

Authors

  • Shalini Saxena Govt.M.L.B. College Bhopal (M.P.)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i9SE.2015.3177

Keywords:

CWTS, Macrophyte,Surface Flow, Domestic Sewage, Constructed Wetlands

Abstract [English]

Wetlands, either constructed or natural, offer a cheaper and low-cost alternative technology for wastewater treatment. A constructed wetland system that is specifically engineered for water quality improvement as a primary purpose is termed as a ‘Constructed Wetland Treatment System’ (CWTS). In the past, many such systems were constructed to treat low volumes of wastewater loaded with easily degradable organic matter for isolated populations in urban areas. However, widespread demand for improved receiving water quality, and water reclamation and reuse, is currently the driving force for the implementation of CWTS all over the world. Recent concerns over wetland losses have generated a need for the creation of wetlands, which are intended to emulate the functions and values of natural wetlands that have been destroyed. Natural characteristics are applied to CWTS with emergent macrophyte stands that duplicate the physical, chemical and biological processes of natural wetland systems. The number of CWTS in use has very much increased in the past few years. The use of constructed wetlands is gaining rapid interest. Most of these systems cater for tertiary treatment from towns and cities. They are larger in size, usually using surface-flow system to remove low concentration of nutrient (N and P) and suspended solids. However, in some countries, these constructed wetland treatment systems are usually used to provide secondary treatment of domestic sewage for village populations. These constructed wetland systems have been seen as an economically attractive, energy-efficient way of providing high standards of wastewater treatment by the help of Phragmite karka plant.


Typically, wetlands are constructed for one or more of four primary purposes: creation of habitat to compensate for natural wetlands converted for agriculture and urban development, water quality improvement, flood control, and production of food and fiber.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson,J.L, Bastviken, S.K., and Tonderski, K.S. 2005. Free water surface wetlands for wastewater treatment in Sweden: nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water science and technology. 51(9), 31- 46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0283

Bastviken, S. 2006. Nitrogen removal in treatment wetlands –Factors influencing spatial and temporal variations. Dissertation No 1041. Linköping University, Sweden Davis, L. 1993. A handbook for constructed wetlands. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/hand.pdf

DeBusk. W.F. 1999. Wastewater Treatment Wetlands: Applications and Treatment Efficiency. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SS294

Fink, D.F., W.J.Mitsch. 2004. Seasonal and storm event nutrient removal by a created wetland in an agricultural watershed. Ecological Engineering, 23(4-5); 313-325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.004

Fisher, J. and Acreman, M.C. 2004. Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrology and earth systems sciences. 8(4), 673-685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-673-2004

Maine, M.A., N. Sune, H.Hadad, G. Sanchez, C. Benetto. 2006. Nutrient and metal removal in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment from a metallurgic industry. Ecological DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.12.004

a. Engineering. 26(4); 341-347

Picard, C.R, Fraser, L.H. and Steer, D. 2005. The interacting effects of temperature and plant communitytype on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresource technology. 96(9),1039 – 1047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.007

Sakadevan, K., H.J. Bavor.1999. Nutrient removal mechanisms in constructed wetlands and sustainableWater management. Water Science and Technology. 40(2); 121-128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0102

Sundaravadivel, M. and Vigneswaran,S. 2001. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatment. CriticalReviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 31(4):351–409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20016491089253

USEPA. 2006. Unites states environmental protection agency. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/wetlands/

Verhoeven, J.T. and Meuleman, F.M. 1999. Wetlands for wastewater treatment: Opportunities andLimitations. Ecological engineering. 12, 5-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00050-0

Constructed wetlands 2002. Alternative Systems Plan Review and Design Course Available at:http://www.cet.nau.edu/Projects/WDP/resources/treatmentsyst/Wetland.htm

Magmedov, V. 2002. Constructed wetlands for low cost treatment. . Available athttp://www.constructedwetlands.org/cw/index.cfm

Nitrogen cycles project. Illinois State Water Survey. Available at:http://www.sws.uiuc.edu/nitro/biogeo.asp

Downloads

Published

2015-09-30

How to Cite

Saxena, S. (2015). EFFICACY OF PHRAGMITE KARKA PLANT IN CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEM. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 3(9SE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i9SE.2015.3177