• Leena Lakhani Govt. Girls P.G. College, Ujjain (M.P.) India



Animals, colors, skin

Abstract [English]

Animals have range of defensive markings which helps to the risk of predator detection (camouflage), warn predators of the prey’s unpalatability (aposematism) or fool a predator into mimicry, masquerade. Animals also use colors in advertising, signalling services such as cleaning to animals of other species, to signal sexual status to other members of the same species. Some animals use color to divert attacks by startle (dalmatic behaviour), surprising a predator e.g. with
eyespots or other flashes of color or possibly by motion dazzle, confusing a predator attack by moving a bold pattern like zebra stripes. Some animals are colored for physical protection, such as having pigments in the skin to protect against sunburn; some animals can lighten or darken their skin for temperature regulation. This adaptive mechanism is known as protective coloration. After several years of evolution, most animals now achieved the color pattern most suited for their natural habitat and role in the food chains. Animals in the world rely on their coloration for either protection from predators, concealment from prey or sexual selection. In general the purpose of protective coloration is to decrease an organism’s visibility or to alter its appearance to other organisms. Sometimes several forms of protective coloration are superimposed on one animal.


Download data is not yet available.


Silberglied, R., Aiello, A.and Windsor, D.M. Disruptive coloration in butterflies – lack of

support in Anartia Fatima. Science. 209, 1980, 617-619. DOI:

Ruxton, GD. The possible fitness benefits of striped coat coloration for zebra. Mamm.

Rev.2002,237-244. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2002.00108.x DOI:

Houston, AI., Stevens, M. and Cuthill, IC. In press. Animal camouflage: compromise or

specialise in a two patch-type environment. Behav. Ecol

Wuster W., Do aposematism and Batesian mimicry require bright markings? A test, using

European viper markings, Proc.R. Soc. B. 271, 2004, 2495-2499. doi: 10.1098/rspb. DOI:

Merilaita, S. and Lind, J. background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the

evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc.R.Soc.B, 2005, 665-670 doi10.1098/rspb.2004.3000

Gilbert F. The evolution of imperfect mimicry. In: Fellowes M.D.E., Holloway G.J, Rolff

Jeditors, Insect evolutionary ecology. CABI; Wallingford, CT:2005

Pie, MR. Signal Evolution in prey recognition systems. Behav. Proc., 68, 2005, 47-50. Doi: DOI:

1016/j.beproc. 2004. 11.001.

Vallin, A., Jakobson, S. and Wicklund, C. Prey survival by predator intimidation: an

experimental study of Peacock butterfly defence against blue tits, Proc R.Soc. B., 272,

1203-1207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3034. DOI:

Endler JA.and Meilke, PWJ., Comparing color patterns as birds see them. Biol. J.Linn.,

, 2005, 405-431. Doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312. 2005. 00540.x

Endler JA. Disruptive and cryptic coloration. Proc. R.Soc.B, 273, 2006, 2425-2426. DOI:


Martin, S., predator perception and the inter relation between different forms of protecting

coloration. Proc. Biol. Sci., 274, 2007, 1457-1467. DOI:

Animal protective coloration.

Animal coloration.http.//

Protective coloration and form.http.//encyclopaedia




How to Cite

Lakhani, L. (2014). PROTECTIVE COLORATION IN ANIMALS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 2(3SE), 1–5.