PROTECTIVE COLORATION IN ANIMALS
Keywords:Animals, colors, skin
Animals have range of defensive markings which helps to the risk of predator detection (camouflage), warn predators of the prey’s unpalatability (aposematism) or fool a predator into mimicry, masquerade. Animals also use colors in advertising, signalling services such as cleaning to animals of other species, to signal sexual status to other members of the same species. Some animals use color to divert attacks by startle (dalmatic behaviour), surprising a predator e.g. with
eyespots or other flashes of color or possibly by motion dazzle, confusing a predator attack by moving a bold pattern like zebra stripes. Some animals are colored for physical protection, such as having pigments in the skin to protect against sunburn; some animals can lighten or darken their skin for temperature regulation. This adaptive mechanism is known as protective coloration. After several years of evolution, most animals now achieved the color pattern most suited for their natural habitat and role in the food chains. Animals in the world rely on their coloration for either protection from predators, concealment from prey or sexual selection. In general the purpose of protective coloration is to decrease an organism’s visibility or to alter its appearance to other organisms. Sometimes several forms of protective coloration are superimposed on one animal.
Silberglied, R., Aiello, A.and Windsor, D.M. Disruptive coloration in butterflies – lack of
support in Anartia Fatima. Science. 209, 1980, 617-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4456.617
Ruxton, GD. The possible fitness benefits of striped coat coloration for zebra. Mamm.
Rev.2002,237-244. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2002.00108.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2002.00108.x
Houston, AI., Stevens, M. and Cuthill, IC. In press. Animal camouflage: compromise or
specialise in a two patch-type environment. Behav. Ecol
Wuster W., Do aposematism and Batesian mimicry require bright markings? A test, using
European viper markings, Proc.R. Soc. B. 271, 2004, 2495-2499. doi: 10.1098/rspb. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb
Merilaita, S. and Lind, J. background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the
evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc.R.Soc.B, 2005, 665-670 doi10.1098/rspb.2004.3000
Gilbert F. The evolution of imperfect mimicry. In: Fellowes M.D.E., Holloway G.J, Rolff
Jeditors, Insect evolutionary ecology. CABI; Wallingford, CT:2005
Pie, MR. Signal Evolution in prey recognition systems. Behav. Proc., 68, 2005, 47-50. Doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.11.001
1016/j.beproc. 2004. 11.001.
Vallin, A., Jakobson, S. and Wicklund, C. Prey survival by predator intimidation: an
experimental study of Peacock butterfly defence against blue tits, Proc R.Soc. B., 272,
1203-1207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.3034
Endler JA.and Meilke, PWJ., Comparing color patterns as birds see them. Biol. J.Linn.,
, 2005, 405-431. Doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312. 2005. 00540.x
Endler JA. Disruptive and cryptic coloration. Proc. R.Soc.B, 273, 2006, 2425-2426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3650
Martin, S., predator perception and the inter relation between different forms of protecting
coloration. Proc. Biol. Sci., 274, 2007, 1457-1467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0220
Animal protective coloration.http://boscage.info/index.php.
Protective coloration and form.http.//encyclopaedia 2.thefreedictionary.com
How to Cite
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.