REVIEW ON ASSESSMENT OF DEPRESSION BY BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY (BDI) AND HAMILTONDEPRESSION RATING SCALE (HDRS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v2.i2.2014.3070Keywords:
Depression, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)Abstract [English]
The study aimed at investigating how to apply two familiar tools formeasuringdepression among diabetic patients in Iran. The study discusses about two inventories and emphasizes that depression is such an important issue that needs to receive a great deal of attention in order to create grounds to be prevented or cured. The issue of concept of tools was also discussed in the study. The discussion in the paper is based on the conceptual framework of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).Thesetools are appropriate for the study because they allowthe reader to understand how to measureand identify symptoms of depression. The paper recommends that the tools should be carefully applied in order to improve mental health and reduce the prevalence of depression.
Downloads
References
Al-Musawi, N. m. M. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with university students in Bahrain. Journal of personality assessment, 77(3), 568-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_13
Aben, I., Verhey, F., Lousberg, R., Lodder, J., & Honig, A. (2002). Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics, 43(5), 386-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.43.5.386
Addington, D., Addington, J., & Atkinson, M. (1996). A psychometric comparison of the Calgary depression scale for schizophrenia and the Hamilton depression rating scale. Schizophrenia research, 19(2), 205-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-9964(95)00070-4
Akdemir, A., Türkçapar, M., Örsel, S., Demirergi, N., Dag, I., & Özbay, M. (2001). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Comprehensive psychiatry, 42(2), 161-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2001.19756
Bagby, R. M., Ryder, A. G., Schuller, D. R., & Marshall, M. B. (2004). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight? American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(12), 2163-2177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2163
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1984). Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(6), 1365-1367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1365::AID-JCLP2270400615>3.0.CO;2-D
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996). Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and-II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13
Beck, A. T., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). BDI-II manual. The psychological corporation. San Antonio, TX.
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
Carroll, B. J., Fielding, J. M., & Blashki, T. G. (1973). Depression rating scales: a critical review. Archives of general psychiatry, 28(3), 361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750330049009
Cicchetti, D. V., & Prusoff, B. A. (1983). Reliability of depression and associated clinical symptoms. Archives of general psychiatry, 40(9), 987-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790080069009
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Corcoran,K., & Fischer, J. (1987). Measures for Clinical Practice and Research, Volume 1: Couples, Families, and Children (Vol. 1): Oxford University Press.
Demitrack, M. A., Faries, D., Herrera, J. M., DeBrota, D., & Potter, W. Z. (1997). The problem of measurement error in multisite clinical trials. Psychopharmacology bulletin, 34(1), 19-24.
Frank, E., Prien, R. F., Jarrett, R. B., Keller, M. B., Kupfer, D. J., Lavori, P. W., . . . Weissman, M. M. (1991). Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder: remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Archives of general psychiatry, 48(9), 851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330075011
Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N., & Ebrahimkhani, N. (2005). Psychometric properties of a Persian‐language version of the Beck Depression Inventory‐Second edition: BDI‐II‐PERSIAN. Depression and Anxiety, 21(4), 185-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20070
Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 23(1), 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
Huprich, S. K., & Roberts, C. R. (2012). The two-week and five-week dependability and stability of the Depressive Personality Disorder Inventory and its association with current depressive symptoms. Journal of personality assessment, 94(2), 205-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.645930
Hedlund, J. L., & Vieweg, B. W. (1979). The Hamilton rating scale for depression: a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 10(2), 149-165.
Kapci, E. G., Uslu, R., Turkcapar, H., & Karaoglan, A. (2008). Beck Depression Inventory II: evaluation of the psychometric properties and cut‐off points in a Turkish adult population. Depression and Anxiety, 25(10), E104-E110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20371
Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.3.221.16560
Piotrowski, C., Sherry, D., & Keller, J. W. (1985). Psychodiagnostic test usage: A survey of the society for personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(2), 115-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4902_1
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., . . . Manber, R. (2003). The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological psychiatry, 54(5), 573-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01866-8
Rehm, L. P., & O'Hara, M. W. (1985). Item characteristics of the Hamilton rating scale for depression. journal of Psychiatric Research, 19(1), 31-41.
Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., & Roth, D. A. (2004). Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition in a sample of college students. Depression and Anxiety, 19(3), 187-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20002
Takahashi, N., Tomita, K., Higuchi, T., & Inada, T. (2004). The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA). Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 19(3), 187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.576
Leentjens, A. F., Verhey, F. R., Lousberg, R., Spitsbergen, H., & Wilmink, F. W. (2000). The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery‐Åsberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 15(7), 644-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200007)15:7<644::AID-GPS167>3.0.CO;2-L
Neuman, W. L. (2005). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches: Allyn and Bacon.
Rehm, L. P., & O'Hara, M. W. (1985). Item characteristics of the Hamilton rating scale for depression. journal of Psychiatric Research, 19(1), 31-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(85)90066-4
Williams, J. B. (1988). A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of general psychiatry, 45(8), 742-747.
Williams, J. B., Kobak, K. A., Bech, P., Engelhardt, N., Evans, K., Lipsitz, J., Kalali, A. (2008). The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton depression rating scale. International clinical psychopharmacology, 23(3), 120-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f948f5
Williams, J. B. (1988). A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of general psychiatry, 45(8), 742-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
