ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL WEBPAGES:A PRELIMINARY SURVEY

Authors

  • Nachiketa Rout Department of Speech Hearing and Communication, National Institute for Empowerment of Persons with Multiple Disabilities, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
  • ReeganAmarnath Department of Speech Hearing and Communication, National Institute for Empowerment of Persons with Multiple Disabilities, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
  • Neeradha Chandramohan The Director, National Institute for Empowerment of Persons with Multiple Disabilities, Tamil Nadu, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v1.i2.2014.3075

Keywords:

Internationalwebsites, Accessibility Statement, STQC, Disabilities, WCAG

Abstract [English]

The paper surveys the extent to which the international webpage’s applied accessibility statements. Methodology includes thirty one international websites have been evaluated for 17 accessibility features prescribed in the accessibility statement by the Directorate of Standardization testing and quality certification (STQC) along with five accessibility features prescribed byWeb content accessibility guidelines (WCAG).The average score obtained was seven. Top scorers were the Ministry of Road and Transport (21), National institute for Empowerment of Person with Multiple Disabilities (16) and Yahoo webpage (12) Bottom scorers were Wikipedia (7), American Speech and Hearing Association (8), Meccawebpage (8) Massachusetts university (6) and International telecommunication union, toolkit for Disables (6).The features which are significantly applied (p<0.05) are Headings, Subheadings, Titles, Tooltip, Connection with social networking and Videos. The feature which were not significantly used by the websites are Skip to main content, icons, Accessibility features, Adjust contrast scheme and Increase text spacing other Twelve features were used in consistently. Hence the accessibility statements which enable merging the digital divide are yet to be appreciated internationally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Accessibility, (2013).Wikipedia. Retrieved on July 15, 2013 from (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility Accessibility statement (2010)).

STQC, Department of Electronics and information technology Retrieved on 2012, December 20, available in DEIT from, http://www.stqc.gov.in/content/learn-about-accessibility features

Census. (2011).

Retrieved 2013, May 22 from, http://www.census India.gov.in/Ad campaign/press/data Highlights.pdf

]Crystal. David English as a Global Language (2003): "A figure of 3%, for example, is a widely quoted estimate of the mid-1980s (e.g. Kachru (1986: 54))." from, http://bolii.blogspot.in/2011/06/how-many-english-speakers-in-india.html

Dan Camden., Sheryl.,&Burgstahler., university of Washington Internationally (2001), from, http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Technology/universal.design.html

DiMaggio., Paul.,EszterHargittai., Coral Celeste., & Steven Shafer. 2004a. "Digital Inequality”:

From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use."Pp. 355-400 in Social Inequality, edited by Kathryn Neckerman.

New York:Russell Sage Foundation._2004b. "Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use." in SocialInequality, edited by Kathryn Necker man. New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Generation Y, 2013. Retrieved on 14 August 2013, from http://www.generationy.com/definition/

Hargittai, Eszter. (2003). "The Digital Divide and What to Do About It." Pp. 822-839 in

Hollierscott, .Dr. (2012, November 6).

Web accessibility: Supporting people with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://rightnow.org.au/topics/disability/web-accessibility-supporting-people-with-disabilities/

Karen Ngai, (2003-2004).

The united nations and enabled persons Rehabilitation Alliance, Hong Kong (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dis50y01.htm)

Right to Information, (2005). Right to Information act of India, Retrieved on 16, August 2013 from, http://rti.gov.in/

Tim Berners-Lee, &Jeffrey Jaffe, (2012) World Wide Web Consortium retrieved on July, 15(2013) (W3C) http://www.w3.org/Consortium/

University of Washington, (2008). Universal Design and principles Retrieved on 16, August 2013. From, http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Programs/ud.html

Van Dijk. & Jan A.G.M. 2005.The Deepening Divide. London: Sage Publications

Vatican Holy See., Retrieved (2013, January 16) http://www.vatican.va/phome_en.htm Vatican publishing house.

WCAG, (2008).Recommendation of sign language videos.Retrieved on June 5, 2013, from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/ P. No (1.2.6).

Web content accessibility guidelines, (2008). W3C Recommendation 11 December 2008. Retrieved on July 15, 2013 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/

WHO, (2013).Classification of health.Retrieved on 1August, 2013. From http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/

WHO, (2001).

International classification of functioning, disability and health Page no.7.Published by world health organization.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-30

How to Cite

Rout, N., Amarnath, R., & Chandramohan, N. (2014). ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONAL WEBPAGES:A PRELIMINARY SURVEY. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 1(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v1.i2.2014.3075