RE-THINKING DESIGN PEDAGOGY, CURRICULA, POLICY, AND PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v14.i2SCE.2026.6747Keywords:
Craft and Design, Education, EnvironmentAbstract [English]
Design education is experiencing a significant shift. Conventional methods, primarily focused on strict skill acquisition, market needs, and hierarchical mentorship, are proving inadequate to equip designers for the intricate ethical, social, and environmental challenges we face today. In light of urgent issues such as climate change, social disparities, and swift technological advancements, design education must progress to cultivate critical thinkers who excel in interdisciplinary collaboration and socially responsible innovation. This research employs a qualitative, thorough approach that encompasses comparative curriculum evaluations of leading design institutions—including the National Institute of Design (NID), Indian Institute of Craft and Design (IICD), Stanford d.school, and Aalto University—policy assessments, stakeholder interviews, and global case studies. It investigates how these programs incorporate interdisciplinarity, sustainability, decolonized knowledge, and inclusivity to develop designers who are prepared for the future.The results indicate a common transition from conventional, lecture-based methods toward collaborative, research-oriented, and hands-on learning frameworks. Curricula are increasingly integrating sustainability and ecological responsibility, enhanced by diverse cultural viewpoints and critical examinations of design’s role in society. Policies that promote equitable access and safeguard indigenous and artisan knowledge support this advancement. Additionally, ethical collaborations between academia and industry align commercial objectives with regenerative design, allowing students genuine involvement in the societal effects of their work.In conclusion, this paper suggests a comprehensive reform framework for design education, highlighting the importance of a well-rounded integration of technical skills, ethical awareness, cultural inclusivity, and sustainability. By adopting collaborative teaching methods, interdisciplinary curricula, inclusive policies, and ethical industry collaboration, design education can realize its potential as a catalyst for social equity, innovation, and environmental stewardship in the 21st century Meyer (2020).
Downloads
References
Ghajargar, M. (2019). What Design Education Tells us about Design Theory. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 38(3), 583–595.
Han, J. (2024). Inclusion, Equity, and Intellectual Equality: Multilingual Students and Teacher Education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 510–526.
Lévy, P. (2012). The Culture of the Internet. Verso.
Meyer, M. W. (2020). Changing Design Education for the Twenty-First Century. International Journal of Design, 14(2), 167–180.
Mortati, M., Shadbolt, N., and Mulholland, P. (2022). Design-Led Policy and Governance: Case Studies from Policy Innovation Labs. Policy Design and Practice, 5(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2152592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2152592
Munna, A. S. (2021). Application of Theories, Principles and Models of Inclusive Curriculum Design: A Review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Comparative Education Research, 3(10), 153–157.
National Institute of Design. (2025). Master of Design (M.Des.) universal Design. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from
Oo, T. Z., et al. (2025). Enhancing Design Skills in Art and Design Education: A Review of Design-Based Learning (DBL) and its Impact on Motivation and Skills. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1521823. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1521823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1521823
Rangarajan, R. (2025). Inclusion and Equity in India's New National Education Policy: A Qualitative Document Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(2), 201–217.
Tang, T., and Zhang, L. (2022). Design Thinking as Digital Transformative Pedagogy in Higher Education. Design Studies, 73, 101–113.
Thoriq, A. (2023). Education for Sustainable Development: A Review of Curriculum Development and Design Strategies in Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(11), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4803
UNESCO. (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from
World Economic Forum. (2022). The Future of Jobs Report 2022. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from
Wu, Y., et al. (2022). Virtual Reality and AI in Design Education. Journal of Design Technology, 15(3), 323–340.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sushmita Shahi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.





















