DNA PROFILING IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION IN INDIA: RIGHT TO FAIR TRAIL VIS -A-VIS RIGHT TO PRIVACY

Authors

  • Hillol Saha Podder Research Scholar, Department of Law, North Bengal University, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i9.2025.6432

Keywords:

DNA Profiling, Criminal Investigation, Right to Privacy, Right to Fair Trial, Forensic Science, Bns, Bnss, Bsa, Human Rights

Abstract [English]

The advancement of forensic science has transformed the Indian criminal justice system, with DNA profiling emerging as one of the most powerful tools for ensuring accurate identification of offenders, exoneration of the innocent and effective administration of justice. However, the growing reliance on DNA evidence has raised critical constitutional questions concerning the right to privacy and the right to a fair trial. This paper explores the legal, ethical, and human rights dimensions of DNA profiling in criminal investigations in India, analyzing the tension between individual privacy and the collective pursuit of justice. It examines the statutory developments brought by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, in relation to their counterparts the IPC, CrPC, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Through an analytical study of judicial precedents, human rights frameworks, and legislative intent, this paper argues that while DNA profiling strengthens the right to a fair trial by enhancing evidentiary accuracy, its intrusive nature necessitates robust procedural safeguards to protect individual autonomy and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhabani Prasad Jena v. (2010). Convenor Secretary, Orissa State Commission for Women, Supreme Court of India.

Committee on Reforms in Criminal Justice System. (2003). Malimath Committee Report. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). DNA Profiling. In Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Gautam Kundu v. State of West Bengal, Supreme Court of India. (1993).

Government of India. (2019). DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill.

Government of India. (2023). Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Government of India. (2023). Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Government of India. (2023). Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.

Government of India. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, Supreme Court of India. (2017).

Kamti Devi v. Poshi Ram, Supreme Court of India. (2001).

Law Commission of India. (2003). 185th report: DNA Profiling and Forensic use of DNA Evidence. Government of India.

Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik v. Lata Nandlal Badwaik, Supreme Court of India. (2014).

People v. Castro, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division. (1989).

R v. Colin Pitchfork, England and Wales Court of Appeal. (1988).

S. and Marper v. United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights. (2008).

Selvi v. State of Karnataka, Supreme Court of India. (2010).

Singh, S. C. (2011). DNA profiling and forensic use of DNA evidence in criminal proceedings. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 53(1), 195–210.

Trivedi, H. U., & Chamar, P. (2004). The Role of DNA Evidence with Special Reference to Criminal Cases in India. International Journal of Forensic Medicine & Research, 6(4), 3–15.

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 10 & 12).

United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(Articles 14 & 17).

Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, Supreme Court of India. (2004).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Podder, H. S. (2025). DNA PROFILING IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION IN INDIA: RIGHT TO FAIR TRAIL VIS -A-VIS RIGHT TO PRIVACY. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(9), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i9.2025.6432