DESIGN THINKING AS A PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK: IMPACT ON STUDENT CREATIVITY AND PROBLEM-SOLVING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i2.2025.6333Keywords:
Design Thinking, Pedagogical Framework, Student Creativity, Problem-SolvingAbstract [English]
This paper examines the impact of design thinking (DT) as a pedagogical framework in higher education, with a specific focus on student creativity and problem-solving abilities. It investigates whether the integration of design thinking processes into teaching methodologies enhances students’ capacity to generate novel ideas, adapt to ambiguity, and address real-world challenges effectively. Drawing on a mixed-methods research design, the study analyzes quantitative measures of creativity and problem-solving, alongside qualitative reflections from students and faculty. Findings suggest that design thinking positively contributes to student learning outcomes, though challenges such as resource availability and faculty readiness remain. This paper contributes to the growing body of empirical evidence on design thinking’s effectiveness in educational contexts.
Downloads
References
Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. Routledge.
Leifer, L., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking Research: Building Innovation Eco-Systems. Springer.
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes Through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
OECD. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Future of Education and Skills Project. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking: Understand–improve–apply. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is Design Thinking and Why is it Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448
Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking Pedagogy: The Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Aditi Jha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
