ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES ON RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF DISPLACED IN ODISHA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i7.2025.6270Keywords:
Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Development, Tribal, National Park, OdishaAbstract [English]
This article documents the process of displacement, rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation phase of the Tribal families of Similipal forest. It articulates issues for rehabilitation and resettlement, such as the concept of 'good governance' versus 'govern-mentality' (the dominance of state over natural resources and lives of forest residents, especially tribals) for the betterment of the displaced families; the need to equip the stakeholders for change in the economy and income-generation activities through imparting skills, tools and know-how; the measures to minimise adverse changes in socio cultural relations due to their spatial movements; and the way to reduce their vulnerability and marginalisation due to lack of political clout in the post-displacement phase. The article emphasises that the state has to adopt a participatory approach for the desired development of the stakeholders, that is, the residents of sanctuaries, especially when it has to deal with tribes whose subsistence economy is pastoralism. This paper describes the process of relocation and rehabilitation of villages populated primarily by tribals in Mayurbhanj district of Odisha. It examines the rehabilitation package offered, the process followed for relocation and resettlement and the impact that this shift has had on the livelihood of the affected people. While the rehabilitation package and the general attitude of the agency that carried out the relocation has been a significant improvement over previous such experiences, the shift has nevertheless had a negative impact on the livelihood of the people.
Downloads
References
Ambrose, P. (1998). Fillip to Land Transfers, Land Acquisition Bill, 1998. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(49), 3107–3109.
Bandopadhyay, D. (1999). Unsettled Resettlement. Mainstream, 37(38), 23–24.
Chakraborty, M. (1987). Settlement of Large Dam Oustees in India. Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA).
Das, V. (1996). Dislocation and Rehabilitation: Definition of Field. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(24), [June 15].
Desai, M., Patkar, M., & Baviskar, A. (2007). Rehabilitation of India Sagar Pariyojana displaced. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(52), 27–36.
Dreze, J., Samson, M., & Singh, S. (Eds.). (1995). Displacement and Resettlement in the Narmada Valley. Sage Publications.
Fernandes, W., & Ganguli, G. (Eds.). (1989). Development and Rehabilitation. Indian Social Institute.
Government of Orissa, Department of Water Resources. (n.d.). Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons: Policy Resolution. Bhubaneswar.
Government of Orissa, Revenue Department. (2006). Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy (Resolution No. 18040-U8iKETi-1/2006, May 14, 2006).
Joshi, B. L. (1982). Displacement and Rehabilitation Study of a Dam-Affected Rural Community. Parimal Prakashan.
Kabra, A. (2003). Displacement and Rehabilitation of an Adivasi Settlement: Case of Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary–M.P. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(29), 3073–3087.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Manoj Kumar Sial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.