PSYCHOLOGICAL COSTS OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS: EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF SHADOW EDUCATION ON CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i9.2025.6238Keywords:
Shadow Education, Children, Mental Health, Academic Success, Emotional WellbeingAbstract [English]
Shadow education, referring to the supplemental, private tutoring provided outside the formal school system has become a global phenomenon. While it aims to improve academic performance, its impact on children’s mental health has raised significant concerns. This paper examines the psychological effects of shadow education on children, exploring issues such as stress, anxiety, pressure to perform, and reduced leisure time. Drawing upon a range of international studies, the paper analyzes the mechanisms through which shadow education contributes to mental health challenges, highlighting the paradox between academic achievement and emotional wellbeing. It also discusses potential interventions to reduce the negative consequences of shadow education, emphasizing the importance of a harmonious blend of learning strategies.
Downloads
References
Agrawal, A., Gupta, P., & Mondal, D. (2024). Determinants of Private Tutoring Demand in Rural India. The Journal of Development Studies, 60(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2273798
Bae, S. H., & Choi, K. H. (2023). The Cause of Institutionalized Private Tutoring in Korea: Defective Public Schooling or a Universal Desire for Family Reproduction? ECNU Review of Education, 7(1), 12–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231182722
Bai, M. (2021). Shadow Education and Social Reproduction. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 637, 260. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.047
Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2001). Worldwide Shadow Education: Outside-School Learning, Institutional Quality of Schooling, and Cross-National Mathematics Achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023001001
Benckwitz, L., Guill, K., Roloff, J., Ömeroğulları, M., & Köller, O. (2022). Investigating the Relationship Between Private Tutoring, Tutors’ Use of an Individual Frame of Reference, Reasons for Private Tutoring, and Students’ Motivational-Affective Outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 95, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102137
Bray, M. (2013). Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on the Expansion and Implications of Private Supplementary Tutoring. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.096
Bray, M. (2021). Shadow Education in Europe: Growing Prevalence, Underlying Forces, and Policy Implications. ECNU Review of Education, 4(3), 442–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119890142
Bray, M., & Hajar, A. (2022). Complexity of the Contexts: Features of Private Tutoring and Units for Comparison in the GCC Countries of the Middle East. ECNU Review of Education, 7(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221113350
Bray, M., & Zhang, W. (2022). Cross-Border Shadow Education: Private Supplementary Tutoring in the Global Education industry. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 42, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.34275
Byun, S., Jung, J., & Shin, T. S. (2023). Does Shadow Education Discourage or Encourage Creative Thinking? Evidence from South Korea. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 46(4), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2023.2245227
Chen, I., & Kuan, P. (2021). The Heterogeneous Effects of Participation in Shadow Education on Mental Health of High School Students in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031222
Entrich, S. R. (2020). Worldwide Shadow Education and Social Inequality: Explaining Differences in the Socioeconomic Gap in access to Shadow Education Across 63 Societies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 61(6), 441–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715220987861
Göktürk, Ş., & Tülübaş, T. (2020). Survival of the Fittest: Women’s Academic Experiences of Navigating Neoliberal Expectations in Turkish Universities. Gender and Education, 33(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1735311
Jokila, S., Haltia, N., & Kosunen, S. (2020). Market-Making Practices of Private Tutoring in Finland: Commercialization of Exam Preparation for Admission to Higher Education. ECNU Review of Education, 4(3), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120956666
Kato, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2024). Transnational Juku: Japanese Shadow Education Institutions in Hong Kong, Beijing, and Shanghai. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09946-5
Kuan, P. (2018). Effects of Cram Schooling on Academic Achievement and Mental Health of Junior High Students in Taiwan. Chinese Sociological Review, 50(4), 391–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2018.1526069
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2024). “To be on the Seventh Sky”: Exploring the Nature and Push of Key Factors in Indian Parents’ Choice for Shadow Education. Education 3-13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2412993
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025a). Confronting the challenges faced by the beneficiaries of shadow education during COVID-19: An Anecdotal Analysis. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 15(1), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i1/2836
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025b). How National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 Can Restrain Shadow Education: An Evaluation of Policy Provisions. In Power of Differentiation: Tailoring learning for every student (pp. 199–218). Redshine Publication eBooks. https://doi.org/10.25215/9141001575.21
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025c). Reimagining Indian Education for Viksit Bharat @2047: Addressing the Challenges of Shadow Education and Inequity. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(6), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n6.009
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025d). Transforming schools with total quality management: A Strategy to Address Shadow Education. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 14(6), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v14n6.002
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025e). Integrating Indian Knowledge System (IKS) Based Pedagogy Into Formal Education to Address the Challenges of Shadow Education: A Review. In Interdisciplinary Advances: Emerging Trends and Innovations (pp. 129–145). Redshine Publication eBooks. https://doi.org/10.25215/9358793546.10
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025f). The Rising Demand For Private Tutoring: Exploring the Factors Behind Shadow Education Growth. Education@ETMA, 4(2), 6–20.
Li, J. (2020). Substitution or Complementation: The Relationship Between School Education and Shadow Education. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(1), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.ar015
Liang, H., Wang, Z., & Wu, W. (2022). The Effect of Shadow Education on Hong Kong Student Wellbeing: Evidence from PISA 2018. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 860179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860179
Liu, J., & Bray, M. (2022). Responsibilised Parents and Shadow Education: Managing the Precarious Environment in China. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(6), 878–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2072810
Mawer, K. (2015). Casting new Light on Shadow Education: Snapshots of Juku Variety. Contemporary Japan, 27(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/cj-2015-0008
McCoy, S., & Byrne, D. (2024). Shadow Education Uptake in Ireland: Inequalities and Wellbeing in a High-Stakes Context. British Journal of Educational Studies, 72(6), 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2024.2331476
Mikkelsen, S. H., & Gravesen, D. T. (2021). Shadow Education in Denmark: In the Light of the Danish History of Pedagogy and the Skepticism Toward Competition. ECNU Review of Education, 4(3), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120983335
Noh, J., Kim, J., Cheon, J., Lee, Y., & Kwon, Y. D. (2020). Relationships Between Extra-School Tutoring Time, Somatic Symptoms, and Sleep Duration of Adolescent Students: A Panel Analysis Using Data from the Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218037
Ørberg, J. W. (2018). Uncomfortable Encounters Between Elite and “Shadow Education” in India: Indian Institutes of Technology and the Joint Entrance Examination coaching industry. Higher Education, 76(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0202-5
Ozaki, M. (2015). A Juku Childhood: Children’s Experiences in Juku Attendance and its Relation to Their Well-Being in Japan Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath.
Pandita, P., Kumar, S., & Aman. (2025b). Impact of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) Skills on Lifelong Learning. Redshine Publication eBooks. https://doi.org/10.25215/9141001575.14
Pandita, P., Kumar, S., & Bhardwaj, A. (2025a). “Mirage of Professional Duties”: The Dilemma Every Teacher Encounters in Meeting the Goal of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy in India. Education 3-13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2456012
Tan, C., & Yang, J. (2019). Path-Dependency or Path-Shaping? An Analysis of the Policy to Target Exam-Orientation in South Korea. Critical Studies in Education, 62(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1611612
Tan, M., & Liu, S. (2023). A Way of Human Capital Accumulation: Heterogeneous Impact of Shadow Education on Students’ Academic Performance in China. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207189
Wang, L. (2022). A Comparative Study of Shadow Education Policies in Elementary Education in China, the United States and South Korea. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 653, 2264–2270. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.461
Xiang, K., Liu, J., Chen, X., & Zhang, A. (2023). Research on the Evolution and Improvement of China’s Shadow Education Governance Policy from the Perspective of Multiple Streams Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1013243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1013243
Yung, K. (2020). Problematising Students’ Preference for Video-Recorded Classes in Shadow Education. Educational Studies, 48(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814697
Yung, K. W. H. (2019). Investing in English Private Tutoring to Move Socially Upward: A Narrative Inquiry of an Underprivileged Student in Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(10), 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1660667
Yung, K., Entrich, S. R., & Bautista, A. (2023). Shadow Education: New Areas of Inquiry in Teaching, Learning and Development. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 46(4), 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2023.2245227
Zhang, M., Wu, Y., Ji, C., & Wu, J. (2022). The Role of Perceived Social Support and Stress in the Relationship Between Hope and Depression Among Chinese Shadow Education Tutors: A Serial Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063348
Zhang, W. (2021). Modes and Trajectories of Shadow Education in Denmark and China: Fieldwork Reflections by a Comparativist. ECNU Review of Education, 4(3), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311211042026
Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2020). A Changing Environment of Urban Education: Historical and Spatial Analysis of Private Supplementary Tutoring in China. Environment and Urbanization, 33(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820981820
Zwier, D., Geven, S., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2021). Social Inequality in Shadow Education: The Role of High-Stakes Testing. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62(6), 412–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715220984500
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sachin Kumar, Poonam Pandita, Dr. Kiran Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
