FROM OWNERSHIP TO ENTITLEMENT: REPLACING THE BILLS OF LADING ACT 1855 WITH THE CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT 1992
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i5.2025.6165Keywords:
Bill of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Bills of Lading Act 1855, Carriages of Goods by Sea Act 1992Abstract [English]
This paper explores the significance and evolution of the Bill of Lading (BoL) in maritime law. A BoL presumes the existence of a contract of carriage, either written or implied, and traditionally fulfills three key roles: serving as a receipt for cargo, providing evidence of a contract of carriage, and acting as a document of title. The Bills of Lading Act 1855 (BoLA) governed the transfer of contractual rights, linking them to the transfer of property in goods. However, the Act faced practical challenges when BoL holders did not possess ownership of the goods. The 1991 Report by the Law Commission of England and the Scottish Law Commission highlighted numerous issues with the BoLA 1855, including its limited applicability and outdated provisions. These deficiencies led to its repeal and replacement by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) 1992, which addressed key problems by granting contractual rights to consignees independent of property transfer.
Downloads
References
Allen v Coltart, [1883] 11 QBD 782.
Bassindale, J. (1992). Title to Sue Under Bills of Lading: The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992. Journal of International Banking Law, 7, 414–418.
Beatson, J., & Cooper, J. J. (1991). Rights of Suit in Respect of Carriage of Goods by sea. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2, 196-.
Bills of Lading Act 1855.
Bradgate, R., & White, F. (1993). The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992. Modern Law Review, 56(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb00955.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb00955.x
Bradgate, R., & White, F. (2012). Commercial law. Oxford University Press.
Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Steam Navigation Co Ltd, [1924] 1 KB 5.
Burrows, A. S. (Ed.). (2015). Principles of English Commercial law. Oxford University Press.
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992.
Carver, T. G. (1890). On Some Defects in the Bills of Lading Act 1855. Law Quarterly Review, 6(3), 289–306.
Chamberlain, A., & Colaço, H. (2023). England and Wales. In A. Chamberlain, H. Colaço, & R. Neylon (Eds.), The shipping law review (10th ed., pp. 243–260). Law Business Research Ltd.
Du Toit, S. F. (2005). The evolution of the bill of lading. Fundamina: A Journal of Legal History, 2005(11), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA1021545X_37
Ferris, C. (1992). The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1992. Comparative Maritime Law, 34(135–136), 329–334.
Great Britain, Law Commission, & Scottish Law Commission. (1991). Rights of Suit in Respect of Carriage of Goods by sea. HMSO.
Humphreys, G., & Higgs, A. (1993). An overview of the Implications of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992. Journal of Business Law, 1993(1), 61–84.
Humphreys, G., & Higgs, A. (1993). Sea transport. Journal of Business Law, 1993(1), 61–84.
Sale of Goods Act 1979.
Sewell v Burdick, [1884] 10 AC 74 (HL).
Stevens, F. (2017). The bill of lading: Holder Rights and Liabilities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351214223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351214223-1
The Aramis, [1989] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 213 (CA).
The Delfini, [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 252.
The Filiatra Legacy, [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 337.
Treitel, G. (1990). Passing of Property under c.i.f. Contracts and the Bills of Lading Act 1855 (‘The Delfini’). Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 1, 1-.
Treitel, G., & Reynolds, F. (2011). Carver on Bills of Lading (Latest ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Zekos, G. I. (1997). The Contractual Role of Bills of Lading Under English law. Managerial Law, 39(5), 5–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022484
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Tung Lam, Truong Quach Ngoc Anh, Hoang Thi Lan Anh, Nguyen Ha Linh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
