APPLYING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY IN NEUROSCIENCE: A PRACTICAL EXAMPLES

Authors

  • Shilpa Karkera Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Trinity Medical Sciences University, St Vincent and Grenadines, India
  • Kelly Manahan Associate Dean of Clinical Sciences and Curriculum, Trinity Medical Sciences University, St Vincent and Grenadines, India
  • Bhavesh Lakhani MD Student, Trinity Medical Sciences University, St Vincent and Grenadines, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v12.i7.2024.5713

Keywords:

Practical Examples, Neuroscience Education, Neurotransmitters, Neuroplasticity

Abstract [English]

Bloom's Taxonomy serves as a structured framework in neuroscience education, guiding educators in designing, implementing, and assessing learning objectives across various cognitive levels.
This abstract explores the practical application of Bloom's Taxonomy in teaching neuroscience concepts, offering insights into effective student engagement.
In neuroscience education, Bloom's Taxonomy is invaluable for curriculum development, instructional strategies, and assessment methods. At the foundational "remembering" level, students recall neuroanatomical structures, physiological processes, or terminology. For example, they identify brain regions or recall neurotransmitter functions.
Progressing to the "understanding" level, students comprehend neuroscientific principles.
This entails explaining action potential propagation or neural pathways in sensory perception. Educators use case studies, discussions, or multimedia for deeper understanding.
At the "applying" level, students apply neuroscience knowledge to solve real-world problems. They analyze clinical cases and propose interventions based on neuroanatomy and physiology understanding.
"Analyzing" prompts critical evaluation of neuroscience theories or research. This involves literature reviews, study critiques, or experiment design.
Finally, at the highest level of "creating," students are challenged to synthesize their understanding of neuroscience concepts to generate novel ideas, designs, or solutions. This could entail developing research proposals, designing educational materials, or proposing innovative treatments for neurological disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adesoji, F. A. (2018). Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and the Modification of Cognitive Levels. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4233

Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. London: Falmer Press.

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Vol. 1, Cognitive Domain, New York, McKay.

Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory Into Pract, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Nurmatova, S., & Altun, M. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Bloom's Taxonomy Integration to Enhancing Novice EFL Educators' Pedagogical Impact. Arab World English Journals, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4593934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.24

Shaughnessy, A.F., Chang, K.T., Sparks, J., Cohen-Osher, M., & Gravel Jr., J. (2014). Assessing and Documenting the Cognitive Performance of Family Medicine rEsidents Practicing Outpatient Medicine, J Grad Med Educ, 6(3), 526-531. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00341.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00341.1

Stringer, J. K., & Stringer, J. K. (2021). Examining Bloom's Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students' Approach to Questions, Medical Science Educator: 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01305-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01305-y

Tay, S.W., Ryan, P., & Ryan, C.A. (2016). Systems 1 and 2 Thinking Processes and Cognitive Reflection Testing in Medical Students, Can Med Educ J, 7(2), e97-e103. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36777

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Karkera, S., Manahan, K., & Lakhani, B. (2024). APPLYING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY IN NEUROSCIENCE: A PRACTICAL EXAMPLES. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 12(7), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v12.i7.2024.5713