PUBLIC POLICIES, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CREATIVE ECONOMY

Gelacio Juan Ramón Gutiérrez Ocegueda; Edgar Gutiérrez Aceves

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i11.2023.5373

Authors

Gelacio Juan Ramón Gutiérrez Ocegueda Professor-Researcher, "C", Department of Social Law, Division of Legal Studies, University Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Edgar Gutiérrez Aceves Lawyer Graduated from University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, México, with a Master's Degree and Doctorate in Law from the Institute of Higher Legal Studies of Jalisco, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i11.2023.5373

Keywords:

Public Policies, Intellectual Property, Creative Economy Overrun

Abstract [English]

Introduction. I.- The Origins of Studies on Agenda Formation and Public Problems. Ii.- The Formation of Agendas Like Object of Study of Political Science. Iii.- What They are and How Agendas are Formed. Iv.- The Institutional Variable. V.- The Effectiveness and Efficiency as Distinctive Signs of Policies Public. Vi.- The Decision-Making Process of Public Policies. Vii.- The Adaptability of Public Policies in Contexts Different. Viii.- Differences that the Concepts Keep Between Each Other Polity, Politics and Policy from The Disciplinary Side Of Public Politics. Ix.- Approaches And Distances Between Public Policies and Governmental Policies. X.- Policies Public, Democracy and Governance. Xi.- The Flow of Policies Public. Xii.- Steps for the Analysis of Public Policies. Xiii.- The Political in Different Properties. Xiv.- Public Policies, Intellectual Property nd Creative Economy. Conclusions. Bibliography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar Villanueva, L. F. (2012). Public Policy (1 ed., Vol. 1). (E. d.-S. D.F.,Ed.) México, México, México : Siglo XXI Editores, S.A. of C.V.

Bardach, E. (1998). The Eight Steps for the Analysis of Public Policies. A Manual for Practice (1 ed.). (D. G.-J. Benavides, Trans.) México, México, México: Center for Economic Research and Teaching. CIDE.

Benavente, J. M., & Grazzi, M. (2017). Public Policies for Creativity and Innovation. Promoting the Orange Economy in Latin America and the Caribbean (1 Ed., Vol. III. Title. IV. Series). (L. Sarah Schineller (A&S Information Specialists, Ed.) Washington, D.C., USA: Inter-American Development Bank. Competitiveness Division, Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0000841

Buitrago Restrepo, F., & Duque Márquez, I. (2013). The Orange.

Cabrero Mendoza, E. (December 2000). Uses and Customs in the Making of Public Policies in Mexico. Limits of Policy Sciences in Culturally and Politically Different Contexts. Management and Public Policy, IX(2, Second Semester), 180-229.

Casar, M. A., & Maldonado, C. (2008). Agenda Formation and Decision- Making Processes: An Approach from Political Science. Working Documents of the Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), 207, 20.

Development Bank (n. d.). Division of Competitiveness, Technology and Innovation. II. Title. III. Series. ed., Vols. JEL Classifications: O31, O34, O54, Z11). (A. I. Sarah E. Schineller, Ed.) Washington, D.C., United States of America : Inter-American Development Bank.

Díaz Dumont, J. R. (2018). Public Policies on Written Intellectual Property. A Measurement Scale for Higher Education in Peru. Venezuelan Management Magazine, 23(81).

Economy. An Infinite Opportunity. (1 ed.). Washington, USA : Inter-American Development Bank.

Ejea Mendoza, G. (2006). Theory and Cycle of Public Policies. (F. H. Latina., Ed.) Henry Dunant Foundation. Latin America., 17.

Howkins, J. (November 7, 2013). The Creative Economy. How People Make Money from Ideas. The First Really Practical Guide for People Working in the Creative Industries. The Creative Economy., 45(2nd.), 263.

Lasswell, H. (1951). The Political Writings. Glencoe, Illinois, Unites States of America : The Free Press.

May, P. J. (October 1992). Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005602

Navarro, J. C., Benavente, J. M., & Crespi, G. (2016). The New Imperativeof Innovation. Police perspectives for Latin America and the Caribbean (1 ed., Vols. Publication Code: IDB-MG-396). (L./.Sarah Schineller (A&S Information Specialists, Ed.) Washington, D.C., USA: Inter-American Devlopment Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0000245

Plata López, L. C., & Cabrera Peña, K. E. (2011). Colombian Regulations on Intellectual Property: An Analysis of Public Policy in Science, Technology and Innovation Based on Economic Development. (C. University Of Medellín, Ed.) Legal Opinion. University Of Medellin. , 10(July 20-December), 87-103.

Roth Deubel, A.-N. (2002). Public Politics. Formulation, Implementation and Evaluation. (First ed.). Bogotá, D.C., Bogotá, D.C., Colombia : Aurora Editions.

Santamaría Hernández, E. (2022). Intellectual Property Rights and Public Policies for the Creative Economy. Recommendations for Latin America and the Caribbean. (Inter-American).

UN, U. N. (2010). Creative Economy report 2010. A Feasible Devlopment Option (Vol. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: UN, United Nations. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD.

UNESCO, O. d. (n. d.) (s.f.). UNESCO, United Nations Educationa l, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, U. (2010). Creative Economy Report 2010. A Feasible Economy Option.