LEARNING STRATEGIES DEVELOPED IN THE STUDENTS THAT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF BIOETHICS

Maldonado León K; Dzul Maldonado L; Dzul Villarruel L

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i6.2023.5233

Authors

Maldonado León, K Professor of Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-4338
Dzul Maldonado, L Master Student at CICATA, IPN, Querétaro, México
Dzul Villarruel, L Universidad Anáhuac, Yucatán, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i6.2023.5233

Keywords:

Learning Strategies, Bioethics, ACRA, Students

Abstract [English]

The strategies lead to a selection of the information that the student studies for the solution of problems and the acquisition of new knowledge. Health personnel in training must allow themselves to modify some behaviors for their professional performance. Cognitive strategies are made up of information acquisition, encoding (or storage), retrieval (or evocation) and support (social, affective) strategies, conceived as a reproductive action, which serves as the basis for the development of basic processes of thought. Objective: To evaluate the learning strategies of the students of the 4th semester of the Medical Surgeon Degree with respect to the Bioethics Learning Unit. Method: Descriptive, observational study with a quantitative, correlational approach. Intentional non-probabilistic sample of 100 students, both sexes, aged 19 to 21 years of the 4th semester of Medical Surgeon for a period of 6 months. The acquisition learning strategies, coding strategies, recovery strategies and support strategies identified in the student when bioethics classes began will be evaluated using the ACRA Scale. Results: Acquisition Strategy: Repetition 85%, Attentional 65%. Coding Strategy: Elaboration divided into relationships 44%, self-questions 25% and paraphrases 31% and Organization 32%. Recovery Strategy: wording 36% and execution 40%. Support Strategy: metacognitive 33%, social 24% and affective 43%. Conclusion: Implementing a study program suitable for the learning of the Bioethics Learning Unit causes a positive impact. The ACRA instrument facilitates better and adequate learning in the clinical area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maldonado León, K, Professor of Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, México

Dzul Maldonado, L, Master Student at CICATA, IPN, Querétaro, México

Dzul Villarruel, L, Universidad Anáhuac, Yucatán, México

References

Burón, J. (1990). Enseñar a Aprender : Introducción a la Metacognición. Bilbao : Mensajero.

Carretero, M. (2001). Metacognición y Educación. Buenos Aires : Aique.

Casado, M. (2014). Bioética y Educación: Sobre la Necesidad de Adoptar una Concepción de la Bioética Flexible y que Promueva la Educación en los Principios de la Declaración Universal Sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 11(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.996

Center for the Study of Language and Information. (2014). Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. En : L. B. Resnik (ed.). The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, N. J. : Erlbaum, 231-235.

MartÍnez, J. (2004). Concepción de Aprendizaje, Metacognición y Cambio Conceptual en Estudiantes Universitarios de Psicología. Ed. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona (España).

Mateos, M. (2001). Metacognición y Educación. Buenos Aires : Aique.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Psicología de la Educación. El Aprendizaje en las Areas de Conocimiento. Prentice Hall. España.

O'Malley, J., and Chamot, A. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (USA). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490

Osses, S. (2017). Hacia un Aprendizaje Autónomo en el Ambito Científico. Inserción de la Dimensión Metacognitiva en el Proceso Educativo. Concurso Nacional Proyectos Fondecyt.

Pintrich, P. (1999). “The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated Learning”. En International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4

Pozo, J. I. (1990). Estrategias de Aprendizaje. En : Coll, C. ; Palacios, J. ; Marchesi, A. (eds.). Desarrollo Psicológico y Educación. Madrid : Alianza, 2, 199-221.

Reich, W. (1978), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Nueva York I, p. XIX. En : SGRECCIA, Elio. Op. cit., 36.

Román, J., and Gallego, S. (2001). Manual ACRA Escala de Estrategias de Aprendizaje. Ed. TEA, Madrid (España).

Schmeck (1988). Estrategias de Aprendizaje, Revisión Teórica y Conceptual. Tomado Desde.

Schraw, G., and Moshman, D. (1995). “Metacognitive Theories”. En Educational Psychology Papers and Publications,7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Tirapu-Ustárroz et al. (2007). ¿Qué es la Teoría de la Mente ?. REV NEUROL, 44(8), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4408.2006295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4408.2006295

Weinstein, C. E., and Meyer, D. K. (1986). The Teaching of Learning Strategies. En Merlin. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd. ed.). Ed. Macmillan, New York (USA), 315-327.

Zuleta, G. L. (2020). Bioética y Educación : Educación Para la Bioética. Producción Limpia, 9(2), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v9n2a2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v9n2a2