VISUALIZATION OF CONCEPTUAL AND PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCES OF CASTE: A LITERARY REFLECTION ON THE ANNIHILATION OF CASTE OF DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i7.2023.5203Keywords:
Caste, Religion, Reform, Society, Intertextuality, Hormony, Coexistence, ProgressAbstract [English]
A good number of writings in different forms are available on Ambedkar and his writings. Particularly, his Annihilation of Caste (AoC) is being overwhelmingly explored with varied objectives and purposes. Despite having aims and objectives for fulfill their agenda, with their own methodologies and theoretical frameworks, they had explored and highlighted the different dimensions and importance of the AoC, which, indeed, was considered controversial in its speech form for the Jat-Pat-Todak Mandal (JPTM), organizer of the conference that was supposed to be held in 1936. Some of the text were “unbearable” for the organizers for having content objectionable, but “would not change a comma” was the response from Ambedkar, and this speech became a book on May 15, 1936, at his own expense. Though there are narratives and anecdotes around the text and its production, the aim of this paper is neither about the making of the book nor what happened to the book. With the self-explanatory title, which has both the name of the text and the social agenda of the author, this paper employs the descriptive tool in deciphering the interplay between the text and the society mediated and manipulated through signifiers that are not only social and cultural but also historical. If, for example, “unbearable” becomes a signifier to connote the mindset of the dominants, then “would not change a comma” seems to transform into a signifier within the same system to connote equally a larger thing in contrast to the former. Interestingly, the text that is filled with and the result of mental agony that is due to the socio-cultural and symbolic “happenings”, has evolved as a sign to become a social agenda not only for the author of the text but also for humanity. Therefore, this reading is not a way to consolidate what is said or written; rather it problematizes the “signs” through their inherent properties of interconnectedness and intertextuality to explore the unexplored on the basis of the frozen text in the fluid social situations. As this study explains, the metaphorical nature of the text is an interesting aspect because of how the overall text is the result of a simple process that is the basic principle of any metaphorical conceptualization of abstract entities in terms of concrete instances that are atrocities, inhuman practices on the voice-less people. By offering a complete summary of the text, which the readers of the present generation may find useful to know the historical perspective on the presence of democratic voices against the caste system, this study presents a simple discussion that conveniently argues in favour of the social agenda, and in the process, many of the points are reproduced with the intension of not hurting anyone, rather, to present what has happened to the speech text. Further, the readers are expected to have an open-minded reading of this article as well as the text of Ambedkar, and the summary will be useful for the young scholars who do not so far have any access to the text.
Downloads
References
Adams, J. (2011). Gandhi : Naked Ambition. Quercus.
Aloysius, G. (1997). Nationalism without a Nation in India. Oxford University Press.
Ambedkar, B. R. (1936). Annihilation of Caste. Honest Books.
Ambedkar, B. R. (2003). Ambedkar : Autobiographical Notes Ravikumar (Ed.). Navayana.
Anand, S. (2002). Meenakshipuram Redux. Outlook, October 21.
Anand, S. (2008). Understanding the Khairlanji verdict. Hindu, October 5.
Anand, S. (Ed.). (2014). Annihilation of Caste : The Annotated Critical Edition. B.R. Ambedkar. Verso.
Bourdieu, P. (1977/1972). Outline of a Theory of Practice R. Nice (Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P. (1984/1979). Distinction : A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste R. Nice (Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, 241–258.
Bourdieu, P. (1990a/1980). The Logic of Practice R. Nice (Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology M. Adamson (Trans.). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. & Intro John B. Thompson G. Raymond & M. Adamson (Trans.). Polity Press.
Burke, E. (2001). Reflections on the Revolution in France : A Critical Edition J. C. D. Clark (Ed.). Stanford University Press. (Orig. Publ. 1790.).
Béteille, A. (2001). Race and Caste. Hindu, March 10.
Carver, T. N. (1915). What is Justice? Essays in Social Justice. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674287907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674287907
Das, B. (Ed.). (2010). Thus Spoke Ambedkar, 1 : A Stake in the Nation. Navayana.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education : An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education [Reprint]. Macmillan, 1958. Indian A. Books (Ed.). New Delhi : 2004.
Forbes Quote (2023). http://www.forbes.com/quotes/8694/
Hiltebeitel, A. (2011). Dharma: Its Early History in Law, Religion, and Narrative. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0001
Hiwrale, A. (2020). Caste: Understanding the nuances from Ambedkar’s expositions. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 6(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481120944772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481120944772
Ingold, T. (1994). Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Routledge.
Kandasamy, M. (2013). How Real-Life Tamil love Stories End. Outlook, July 22.
Moon, V. (Ed.). (2014). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. New Delhi : Dr. Ambedkar foundation. (First published in 26 January 1991 by Education Department, Govt. Of Maharashtra.), 9.
Narayanasvami Aiyar, K. (1914). Thirty Minor Upanishads. Robarts. University of Toronto : Printed by Annie Besant at the Vasanta Press.
Noordegraaf, M., & Schinkel, W. (2011). Professionalism as Symbolic Capital : Materials for a Bourdieusian Theory of Professionalism. Comparative Sociology, 10(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913310X514083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913310X514083
Olivelle, P. (1998). Caste and Purity: A Study in the Language of the Dharma Literature. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 32(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/006996679803200203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/006996679803200203
Olivelle, P. (2008). Caste and Purity. Collected Essays. Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-8453-732-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-8453-732-4
Parel, A. (Ed.). (1997). ‘Hind Swaraj’ and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Ramakrishnan, M., & Sahoo, S. (2023). Necessitating a Dialogue on the Idiosyncrasy of Imposed Identity on Tribal Communities with Reference to the Lodhas of Eastern India. In S. K. Kolay & NilanjanKhatua (Eds.), Vulnerable tribal groups in India, Concept Publication Pvt Ltd, 125–180.
Round Table India (2023).
Ruesch, J. (1972/1966). Social Process. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations Mouton, 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816228.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816228.21
Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.). (1972). Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations. Mouton.
The Ambedkar Today (n.d.).
Viswanathan, S. (2005). Dalits in Dravidian Land : Frontline Reports on Anti-Dalit Violence in Tamil Nadu (1995–2004). Navayana.
Weininger, E. (2005). Foundations of Bourdieu’s Class Analysis Ed. Erik Olin Wright Approaches to Class Analysis (pp. 82–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488900.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488900.005
Zelliot, E. (2013). Ambedkar’s World : The Making of Babasaheb and the Dalit Movement. Navayana.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ramakrishnan M., Shalini Pallavi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
