• Dr. Geetha. A Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Maharani Cluster University, Palace Road, Bengaluru- 560001, Karnataka, India




Alternative Method of Teaching Psychology, College Students and Outcome

Abstract [English]

The aim was to study the outcome of alternative methods of teaching Psychology on performance among college students. The sample consisted of females, aged between 19-21 years studying in degree Government College. A purposive sampling and before-after experimental-control group design was opted for the study. The sample were administered GHQ as a screening tool to rule out any recent psychopathology in the students. Students with below cut-off scores were administered an intelligence test and only students with average ability were selected for the study. Later on these students were administered digit span test and students with and above digit span of five were further considered for the study. After this the students were administered an objective pre-test on the topics related to psychology. Later the students were randomly divided into 2 groups of experimental and control group. The experimental group were exposed to one month of 4 days a week of alternative method of teaching including power point presentation, assignment submission, group discussion, seminar presentation, documentary screening, collecting material related from newspapers and internet, collage making, dumb sharads activity, pick and speak activity, interactive lecture, self-learning, using case studies, field visit etc. the control group was exposed to regular teaching method. After a month of exposure an objective post-test was done on both the groups. ‘t’ test was conducted to determine the significant difference between mean scores of experimental and control group after the two teaching methods. The results indicated that experimental group had shown significantly better performance on objective test than control group. Such brief alternative methods can be part of the college programmes to promote better performance among students.


Download data is not yet available.


Aron, L.Y. (2003). Towards a Typology of Alternative Education Programs : a Compilation of Elements from the Literature, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e723342011-001

Bhatia, C. M. (1955). Performance Test of Intelligence Under Indian Conditions. New York, NY, US : Oxford University Press.

Cao, Y., and Zou, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Interactive Simulations in Teaching Psychology to Undergraduate Students. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(1), 49-65.

Carnie, F. (2003). Alternatives in Education - A Guide, Routledge Falmer, London.

Chen, Y. L., and Chen, Y. H. (2018). Using Game-Based Learning to Facilitate Computer Science Education : A Review of Literature. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 21(2), 1-11.

Dawes, M. J., and Zaniewski, A. M. (2018). Using Peer-Led Teaching in a Psychology Course for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 45(3-4), 154-164.

Gok, T., and Silber, K. H. (2019). Blended Learning in Teaching Psychology to Undergraduate Students : Using Technology to Enhance Learning Outcomes. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(1), 81-105.

Goldberg and Hillier (1972). The Scaled Version of General Health Questionnaire. Psycho Med. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700021644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644

Greeno, J. G. (2006). "Learning in Activity", in R.K. Sawyer (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge, New York, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.007

Koetzsch, R. (1997). The Parents' Guide to Alternative Education, Shambala, Boston.

Raven, J. C. (1981). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scale. San Antonia, Tx: Harcourt Assessment.

Raywid, M.A. (1988). "Alternative Schools: What Makes Them Alternative?" The Education Digest, 54(3), 11-12.

Roussou, M., and Kallergis, G. (2017). Virtual Reality in Education : The Future of Learning ? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(3), 269-275.

Sawyer, R. K. (ed.) (2006). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833

Shih, J. L., and Chuang, H. H. (2015). An Exploration of the Flipped Classroom Approach and its Potential Use in Higher Education. Journal of Education And Learning, 4(4), 1-12.

Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., and Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 1036-1049. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892

Wu, J. Y., and Huang, Y. M. (2017). The Use of Case-Based Learning in Teaching Abnormal Psychology to Undergraduate Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(8), 69-79.




How to Cite

A, G. (2023). OUTCOME OF ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF TEACHING PSYCHOLOGY ON PERFORMANCE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 11(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i2.2023.5039