A SURVEY OF CONSUMERS' PURCHASE INTENTIONS IN ADVERTORIALS PROMOTION IN COMMUNITY BUSINESS

Authors

  • Li-Wei Lin School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College, Zhejiang, China
  • Su-Rong Yan School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College, Zhejiang, China
  • Jia-Lu Zhou School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College, Zhejiang, China
  • Rajesh Kaluri Department of Software and Systems Engineering, VIT University, Vellore Tamil Nadu India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i2.2020.190

Keywords:

Soft Text Promotion, Online Red Live Broadcast, Purchase Intention, Sharing Information

Abstract [English]

Soft text promotion and planning has become one of the key factors in attracting consumers' purchase intentions. Soft text promotion includes the use of posters, videos, online live broadcasts and other related methods to achieve consumer purchase intentions. The most important part of community business is to establish a long-term partnership between buyers and sellers through these soft-text promotion methods. This paper is expected to issue 600 copies through questionnaires to see if consumers see the promotion of soft texts into purchase motives. Or the consumer in the purchase process, fancy a sense of identity with a certain brand. We have found that consumers are promoting their activities through soft papers, resulting in direct purchase intentions. The results show that consumers will look at the introduction of soft paper promotion and share information with other consumers. These factors will cause consumers to motivate to purchase intentions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. J. O. b., & processes, h. d. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. 50(2), 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Black M (1979) More about metaphor. In: Ortony A(ed.) Metaphor and Thought, pp.19-43. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004

Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy.

Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. J. J. o. m. (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? , 73(3), 52-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.52

Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A New Model of Positive Experience: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Centner, D., and Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. In A. Ortony, Ed., Metaphor and thought (2d ed.), pp. 447-480. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.022

Centner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D. Miall, Ed., Metaphor: Problems and perspectives, pp. 106-132. Brighton: Harvester.

Chang, C.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-K., & Chu, X.-Y. J. I. J. o. A. (2018). Right metaphor, right place: choosing a visual metaphor based on product type and consumer differences. 37(2), 309-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1240468

Chun, H. H., Diehl, K., & MacInnis, D. J. J. J. o. M. (2017). Savoring an upcoming experience affects ongoing and remembered consumption enjoyment. 81(3), 96-110.

Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. J. D. s. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. 25(6), 547-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001

Dube, L., & Bel, J. L. L. J. A. E. A. (2001). A differentiated view of pleasure: Review of the literature and research propositions.

Edvardsson, B., Enquist, B., & Johnston, R. J. M. S. Q. A. I. J. (2010). Design dimensions of experience rooms for service test drives: case studies in several service contexts. 20(4), 312-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521011057469

Fainsilber, L., Ortony, A. J. M., & Symbol. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. 2(4), 239-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2

Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., Orús, C. J. T., & Informatics. (2017). The influence of online product presentation videos on persuasion and purchase channel preference: The role of imagery fluency and need for touch. 34(8), 1544-1556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.002

Gibbs, R. W, Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gruber, H. E. (1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In R. J. Stern-berg and J. E. Davidson, Eds., The nature of insight, pp. 397-432. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grönroos, C. J. M. t. (2006). Adopting a service logic for marketing. 6(3), 317-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066794

Haskell, Robert E. (1987), Cognition and Symbolic Structures: The Psychology of Metaphoric Transformation, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M.-O. J. J. o. B. R. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. 71, 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.004

Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Metaphor, metaphor schemata, and selective inferencing. Technical Note 204, SRI Projects 7910 and 7500. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh (Vol. 4): New york: Basic books.

Lakoff, G., and Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001

Li, Q., Liang, N., & Li, E. Y. J. E. C. R. (2018). Does friendship quality matter in social commerce? An experimental study of its effect on purchase intention. 18(4), 693-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9299-6

Lin, Z., Yang, Z. J. F. L. T., & Research. (2010). A study of semantic relations and rankshift directions in grammatical metaphor [J]. 6, 403-410.

Lindstrom, M. J. J. o. P., & Management, B. (2005). Broad sensory branding. 14(2), 84-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510592554

Lu, B., Fan, W., & Zhou, M. J. C. i. H. B. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. 56, 225-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057

MacCormac, Earl R. (1985), A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.

Mccracken, J. C., & Macklin, M. C. J. M. L. (1998). The role of brand names and visual cues in enhancing memory for consumer packaged goods. 9(2), 209-226.

Meeds, R., Liginlal, D., Ahmad, R., & Gopinath, P. (2016). THE EFFECTS OF CULTURAL DESIGN STYLE AND INFORMATION RICHNESS ON CONSUMERS'VISUAL ATTENTION, COMPREHENSION AND ATTITUDES TOWARD ARABIC-LANGUAGE WEBSITES. Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising. Conference. Proceedings (Online).

Miller, G. A. (1993). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony, Ed., Metaphor and thought (2d ed.), pp. 357-400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.019

Miller, J. H. J. A. B. (1979). The Function of Rhetorical Study at the Present Time. 62, 10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/ade.62.10

Morgan, S. E., & Reichert, T. J. J. o. A. (1999). The message is in the metaphor: Assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements. 28(4), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673592

Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere and H. Feigl, Eds., Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, pp. 3-44. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Ortony, Andrew (1979), "Beyond Literal Similarity," Psychological Review, 86, 161-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161

Ortony, A., & Fainsilber, L. (1987). The role of metaphors in descriptions of emotions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1987 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/980304.980346

Patrick, V. M., & Park, C. W. J. J. o. R. (2006). Paying before consuming: Examining the robustness of consumers’ preference for prepayment. 82(3), 165-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2006.06.002

Schmitt, B. J. F., & Marketing, T. i. (2011). Experience marketing: concepts, frameworks and consumer insights. 5(2), 55-112.

Schmitt, B. J. J. o. m. m. (1999). Experiential marketing. 15(1-3), 53-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. J. J. o. c. r. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. 15(3), 325-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209170

Stainbrook, E. J. (2003). Reading comics: A theoretical analysis of textuality and discourse in the comics medium, doctoral dissertation. IndianaCounty: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Steen, G. J. (1989). Metaphor and literary comprehension: Towards a discourse theory of metaphor in literature. Poetics, 18:113-141.

Sundar, A., & Noseworthy, T. J. J. J. o. M. (2014). Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. 78(5), 138-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0253

Tasić, M., Stamenković, D. J. P.-S., & Sciences, B. (2015). The interplay of words and images in expressing multimodal metaphors in comics. 212, 117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.308

Verbrugge, R. R., & McCarrell, N. S. J. C. p. (1977). Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling. 9(4), 494-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90018-4

Yusuf, A. S., Che Hussin, A. R., & Busalim, A. H. J. J. o. S. M. (2018). Influence of e-WOM engagement on consumer purchase intention in social commerce DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2017-0031

Downloads

Published

2020-02-29

How to Cite

Lin, L.-W., Yan, S.-R., Zhou, J.-L., & Kaluri, R. (2020). A SURVEY OF CONSUMERS’ PURCHASE INTENTIONS IN ADVERTORIALS PROMOTION IN COMMUNITY BUSINESS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i2.2020.190