COMPARING MODELS OF ACCREDITATION AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP USING GENERALIZED STRUCTURAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
Keywords:Generalized Structured Component Analysis, National Education Standard, National Examination
The National Education Standards Board in Indonesia is an independent and professional institution which maintain and control the quality of education. The National Examination is one of indicator which can be used as a basis for evaluating quality of education. National Accreditation Board for Schools conducts assessment to the schools on fulfillment of the established standards through accreditation process. There are several theoretical models of relationship between 8 national education standards for describing causality each other. The objective of this study are (1) to compare and determine the best model of the relationship between eight standards using generalized structured component analysis; and (2) to evaluate validity of indicators of accreditation instrument. It has been concluded that the model published by the Ministry of Education and Culture (2017) was the best model. AVE and Cronbach’s alpha showed that score on Mathematics, Science, English and Indonesian Language are important indicators for academic performance. Critical ratio and variance inflation factor showed that there are 13 of 124 indicators of accreditation instrument are not valid. Analysis of structural model showed that school management has a big influence on standard of teachers and education staff. In addition, curriculum, standard of competency, standard of assessment and standard of process have direct influences to academic achievement.
[KEMDIKBUD] Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Pedoman Pemenuhan Standar Nasional Pendidikan pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTS). Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan; 2012.
[KEMDIKNAS dan KEMENAG] Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional dan Kementrian Agama. Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan: Panduan Teknis Evaluasi Diri Sekolah (EDS). Jakarta (ID); 2010.
Fornell C, Lacker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variable and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1):39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Hijrah M, Susetyo B, Sartono B. Structural Equation Modeling of National Standard Education of Vocational High School Using Partial Least Square Path Modeling. IJSRSET. 2018; 4:1418-1422.
Hwang H, Takane Y. Generalized Structured Component Analysis. Psychometrica. 2004; 69(1):81-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295841
Hwang H, Takane Y. 2014. Generalized Structured Component Analysis: A Component-Based Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b17872
Ryoo JH, Hwang H. Model Evaluation in Generalized Structured Component Analysis Using Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8:1-10.
Setiawan IA, Susetyo B, Fitrianto A. Application of Generalized Structural Component Analysis to Identify Relation between Accreditation and National Assessment. IJSRSET. 2018; 4:93-97.
Vita D, Susetyo B, Indriyanto B. Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) for National Education Standards (NES) for Secondary School in Indonesia. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2015; 11(4):2441-2449.
How to Cite
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.