EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BLENDED LEARNING ON STUDENTS' LEARNING OUTCOME IN INTERIOR DESIGN MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION COURSE

Authors

  • Ruchira Jain Phd Scholar, Sushant University.
  • Dr. Sachin Datt Associate Professor, Sushant University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1.2025.5464

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Interior Design, Evaluating, Materials, Activities

Abstract [English]

Interior design materials courses are essential for preparing students for real-world professional practice. Students must not only understand the characteristics and appropriate applications of various materials but also think critically about material selection to meet both aesthetic and functional requirements. Blended learning—a combination of online instruction and face-to-face engagement—offers a promising approach by integrating self-directed digital resources with hands-on, interactive activities. This study investigates the impact of blended learning on student learning outcomes in a postgraduate interior design materials course, employing a quasi-experimental post-test-only design. One group of students participated in a blended learning model that combined online instruction with hands-on lab activities. A second group engaged in traditional classroom instruction paired with lab activities, while a third group followed a conventional lecture-based classroom format without lab engagement. Bloom’s Taxonomy was used as the framework for assessing learning outcomes, with post-test questions targeting all cognitive levels—from remembering and understanding to creating. Results indicated that students in the blended learning group outperformed their peers in higher-order cognitive skills, particularly in analyzing, evaluating, and creating practical material solutions. The findings also revealed no significant difference in lower-order thinking skills (e.g., remembering and understanding) between students taught through traditional classroom methods and those taught online.

References

Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0221765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). George Washington University.

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711

Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Page.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.

Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001

Dulux Paints. (n.d.). Interior painting tips and techniques. Retrieved from https://www.dulux.com

Nerolac Paints. (n.d.). Wall texture designs & paint finishes. Retrieved from https://www.nerolac.com

Sherwin-Williams. (2022). Paint application guide for professionals. Sherwin-Williams Company.

Asian Paints. (2021). Product and application manual. Retrieved from https://www.asianpaints.com

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

How to Cite

Jain, R., & Datt, S. (2025). EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BLENDED LEARNING ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOME IN INTERIOR DESIGN MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION COURSE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1.2025.5464