ENHANCING SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF MACHINE INTELLIGENCE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING TOOLS"

Authors

  • Dr. Rekha Pathak Principal, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Education, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Ashwini D. Gulhane Assistant Professor, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Education, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Ratnamala Machhindra Baviskar Assistant Professor, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Education, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.1748

Keywords:

Machine Intelligence, Science Education, Secondary Students, Innovative Learning Tools, Personalized Learning, Educational Technology, Student Engagement

Abstract [English]

The integration of machine intelligence (MI) in education is transforming traditional pedagogies, offering innovative tools that can significantly enhance science education for secondary students. This conceptual paper explores the development and evaluation of MI-driven learning tools designed to improve student engagement, comprehension, and academic outcomes in science education. By examining the theoretical foundations of MI in education, reviewing current applications, and discussing the challenges and opportunities associated with this integration, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how machine intelligence can be harnessed to create more effective and personalized learning experiences. The paper concludes with recommendations for educators, policymakers, and researchers to support the successful implementation and assessment of MI in secondary science education.

References

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education.

Chen, C.-M., & Chen, L.-C. (2009). "Personalized Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning System for Supporting Effective English Vocabulary Learning." Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 82-94.

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)..

Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). "Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review." Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420

Mayer, R. E. (2002). "Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two-Way Street Between Cognition and Instruction." New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 55-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.47

Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. Morgan Kaufmann.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Pathak, R., Gulhane, A. D., & Baviskar, R. M. (2024). ENHANCING SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF MACHINE INTELLIGENCE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING TOOLS". ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(5), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.1748