POLITICAL FRAMEWORKS FOR TRIBAL EMPOWERMENT IN INDIA: SUCCESSES, CHALLENGES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.1612Keywords:
Tribal Development, India, Scheduled Tribes, Policy Implementation, Socio-Economic ChallengesAbstract [English]
This study examines the political policies and programs implemented for the socio-economic development of tribal communities in India, recognized as Scheduled Tribes (STs). Despite constitutional safeguards and targeted initiatives, tribal communities continue to face significant socio-economic challenges. This research reviews key policies such as the Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP), Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana, Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRS), and the Forest Rights Act. It assesses their effectiveness, identifies persistent barriers, and offers recommendations for improvement. The findings indicate that while there has been notable progress in areas like education and economic empowerment, the overall impact is uneven due to administrative inefficiencies, lack of awareness, and inadequate implementation. Recommendations emphasize strengthening policy execution, enhancing administrative efficiency, increasing awareness and participation, improving infrastructure, and leveraging technology for better service delivery. Additionally, the study highlights the need for robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to ensure the sustained success of development initiatives. By addressing these challenges and fostering greater community involvement, the Indian government can enhance the socio-economic conditions of tribal communities. This research underscores the importance of continuous policy refinement and inclusive development strategies to achieve long-term improvements for India's tribal populations.
References
Béteille, A. (1998). The Idea of Indigenous People. Current Anthropology, 39(2), 187-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204717
Census of India. (2011).
Constitution of India. (2021).
Kumar, K. (2019). Tribal Development in India: Policy and Practice. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(2), 43-49.
Ministry of Law and Justice. (2021). Constitution of India. Government of India.
Ministry of Panchayati Raj. (2016). PESA Act, 1996. Government of India.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs. (2006). The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act. Government of India.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs. (2021). Annual Report. Government of India.
Mohindra, K. S., Haddad, S., & Narayana, D. (2011). "My Health is our Health": Impact of Women's Health on Men's Health in Low-Income Rural Indian Households. Social Science & Medicine, 73(5), 588-595.
Shah, A. (2010). In the Shadows of the State: Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822392934
TRIFED. (2021). Annual Report.
Xaxa, V. (2001). Protective Discrimination: Why Scheduled Tribes Lag Behind Scheduled Castes. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(29), 2765-2772.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Arti Bhatnagar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.