AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH AGAINST PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE AFTER EXPLOSION RC BUILDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v4.i4.2020.97Keywords:
Earthquake Engineering, Dynamics of Structures, Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Blast/ Impact/Shock, Design CodesAbstract
Reinforced concrete structures may be subjected to uncontrolled sudden loads such as weight or rock fall, industrial or transport accidents, military or terrorist activities, controlled or bottled gas, natural gas, fuel tanker or fuel station explosion. It is difficult to predict how the structure will react under dynamic impact loading. However, creating scenarios taking measures against dynamic loading is a simple solution for behavior impact prediction. In this study was investigated to remove of the middle column in the reinforced concrete structure after the internal explosion. Static analyzes were carried out with IdeCAD Static software according to the load distributions after the carrier element removed in the typical building. In this study, load distribution principles are reviewed in accordance with ASCE 7-10, GSA 2016 and ACI 318 recommendations after subtracting elements. As a result, element remove scenarios are required as a design principle for structures.
Downloads
References
G. Cullis (2001), "Blast Waves and How they Interact with Structures," Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-147-01-02
P. D. Smith and T. A. Rose (2002), "Blast Loading and Building Robustness", Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.95
R. A. Scott and L. J. Doemeny (1987), “Design Considerations for Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities”, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
P. D. Smith, T. A. Rose and E. Saotonglang (1999), "Clearing of Blast Waves from Building Facades," Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 193-199.
Sasani M, Kazemi A, Sagiroglu S, Forest S (2011) Progressive collapse resistance of an actual 11-story structure subjected to severe initial damage. J Struct Eng 137(9):893–902. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000418
Qian K, Li B (2017) Dynamic and residual behavior of reinforced concrete floors following instantaneous removal of a column. Eng Struct 148:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06. 059
Chen J, Huang X, Ma R, He M (2012) Experimental study on the progressive collapse resistance of a two-story steel moment frame. J Perform Constr Facilit 26(5):567–575. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.059
Song BI, Sezen H (2013) Experimental and analytical progressive collapse assessment of a steel frame building. Eng Struct 56:664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.050
Xiao Y, Kunnath S, Li FW, Zhao YB, Lew HS, Bao Y (2015) Collapse test of three-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame building. ACI Struct J 112(4):429–438
Liu C, Fung TC, Tan KH (2016) Dynamic performance of flush end-plate beam-column connections and design applications in progressive collapse. J Struct Eng 142(1):04015074-1-14. https:// doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001329
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14), ACI, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
TS 498, 1987, Design Loads for Buildings, Turkish Standards Institution, Turkey.
TS 648, 1980, Building Code for Steel Structures, Turkish Standards Institution, Turkey.
Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC), 2007, Principles for Buildings to be constructed on Earthquake Zones, The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Turkey.
General Services Administration (GSA) (2003), Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: Office of Chief Architects.
