• Mirza Aamir Baig Department of Civil Engineering, Alfalah University, India
  • Tanveer Sultan Bhat Department of Civil Engineering, Alfalah University, India
Keywords: Structural Motions, Damping, Passive and Active control devices, TMD, AMD


High rises have involved interest for engineers for as long as century. All the more along these lines, the previous thirty years have seen various structures ascending starting from the earliest stage, resisting gravity. Burj Khalifa Dubai, Taipei, Petronas twin pinnacle, Empire state building are a portion of the living instances of designing wonders.

What befalls a structure when it arrives at such inconceivable statures separated from the awe that it will be, it additionally represents a gigantic measure of challenge for the auxiliary architect. Since then these structures are looked by administration stacking conditions. Two destroying powers of nature, wind and seismic tremor become truly basic for these structures. The harmony among firmness and pliability to be given turns into the controlling components to the plan of such structures. Routinely giving enough firmness against colossal burdens doesn't appear to fulfill the necessities. These structures are frequently given adequate pliability so as to disperse the gigantic measure of powers. In any case, there is a limit, with respect to how much malleability can be given in a structure. A fast figuring shows that the highest-level uprooting that can be securely borne by a 500 m tall structure is nearly 2m. The structure would not fall flat if its popular narrative dislodges by 2m.

 Use of different sorts of dampers and isolators have been utilized in disseminating this vitality. Much exploration has gone into advancement of TMDs, ATMDs, BTMDs, and seismic base isolators. Examination has additionally gone into different kind of investigations method as more vigorous powerful examination, weakling investigation, time history investigation and execution-based investigation.

Here an endeavor has been made to explore the near benefits and negative marks of various sorts of auxiliary arrangements to comprehend their conduct under seismic and wind loads. The structure considered is of 50 stories. Different designs that have been considered incorporates propped frameworks, shear divider frameworks, dampers and isolators. The investigations results have been organized and plotted to comprehend their conduct. Time history examination and execution-based investigation by sucker investigation have additionally been concentrated to comprehend the conduct of structures.


Download data is not yet available.


Ashik S. Parasiya Paresh Nimodiya “A review on comparative analysis of brace frame with conventional lateral load resisting frame in rcc structure using software”.

Suresh P, Panduranga Rao B, Kalyana Rama J.S “Influence of diagonal braces in RCC Multi-storied frames under wind loads: A case study

Umesh. R. Biradar, Shivaraj Mangalgi “seismic response of reinforced concrete structure by using different bracing systems”.

Mohammed yousuf, P.M. shimpale “Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building with Plan Irregularities”.

Mr. S. Mahesh, Mr. Dr. B. Panduranga Rao “Comparison of analysis and design of Regular and irregular configuration of multi-Story building in various seismic zones and Various types of soils using ETABS and STAAD”.

Nauman Mohammed, Islam Nazrul “Behaviour of Multistorey RCC Structure with Different Type of Bracing System (A Software Approach)”.

S. Zubair Ahmed, K.V. Ramana, Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar “Seismic Response of RC frame structure with soft storey”.

Jain. S K, IIT Roorkee Review of Indian seismic code, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002

Reddy K. R. C, Sandip A. Tupat (2012). “The effect of zone factors on wind and earthquake loads of high-rise structures”.

Shahzad Jamil Sardar and Umesh. N. Karadi (2014) “effect of change in shear wall Location on storey drift of multistory building subjected to lateral loads”.

S.R. Thorat and P.J. Salunke “Seismic Behaviour of Multistorey Shear Wall Frame Versus Braced Concrete Frames”.

David T. Finley, Ricky A. Cribbs “Equivalent Static vs. Response Spectrum A Comparison of Two Methods”.

Kareem, A., Kijewski, Y, “Mitigation of Motions of Tall Buildings with Specific Examples of Recent Applications,” Wind and Structures., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 201-251 (2018). DOI:

Soong, T.T. and G.F. Dargush. (2017), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, Wiley & Sons, New York.

Housner, G.W., et al. (1997), Structural Control: Past, Present and Future, Special Issue of Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123(9). DOI:

Kwok, K.C.S. and N. Isyumov. (July 20188), Aerodynamic Measures to Reduce the Wind-Induced Response of Buildings and Structures, Proceedings of Structural Engineers World Congress, San Francisco, CD-ROM: T179-6.

How to Cite
BAIG, M. A., & Sultan Bhat, T. (2020). SEISMIC UPGRADATION OF TALL BUILDINGS. International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies, 4(5), 6-15.