Article Type: Research Article Article Citation: Daniel Favre,
and Olle Johansson. (2020). DOES ENHANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION DISTURB
HONEYBEES’ BEHAVIOUR? OBSERVATIONS DURING NEW YEAR’S EVE 2019. International
Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(11), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i11.2020.2151 Received Date: 26 October 2020 Accepted Date: 20 November 2020
Keywords: Honeybees Sounds Worker Piping RF-EMF New Year’s Eve Anthropogenic
Electrosmog Insects, and especially honeybees, are under major threat everywhere around the globe. Current studies lack in the consideration of potential effects which may directly affect other organisms or ecosystems, because of the verPy limited attention which is usually received by the potential adverse ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Here, it is hypothesized that planetary enhancement of electromagnetic radiation produces a disturbing pollution for honeybees. In order to test this hypothesis, a bi-directional wide frequency range microphone was placed during the New Year’s Eve night 2019 in a honeybee hive, in order to detect and analyze potential changes in the acoustic behaviour of the bees due to increased phone induced RF- EMF radiation. It was observed that the honeybees produced strong worker piping signals. Such signals are typically produced shortly before takeoff of a swarm, or as the sign of a disturbed colony. It is therefore hypothesized that planetary enhancement of electromagnetic radiation produces a disturbing pollution for honeybees, such as during the New Year’s Eve night. Evidence of proof of such electromagnetic waves taking place at New Year's Eve should be investigated worldwide during forthcoming similar events based on a global network of long term EM measurements.
1. INTRODUCTIONHoneybees are under major threat everywhere
around the globe [1], [2]. The so-called colony collapse disorder (CCD) is a recent
phenomenon [3]. Current theories about the potential cause(s) of CCD essentially
include increased losses due to the invasive varroa mite, pesticide poisoning,
potential immune-suppressing stress on bees, drought, monocultural practices,
migratory stress due the moving of the bees in long distances, and increased
transmission of pathogens [4], [5]. Furthermore, radiation from mobile phones and mast antennas could also have
contributed to the dramatic decline in insect populations, as revealed by a
recent meta-analysis; indeed, increased exposure to electromagnetic radiation
is "probably having a negative impact on the insect world", according
to a recent study [6]. Thielens et al. [7] studied the effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on the Western honeybee. They showed that a relatively small shift of 10% of environmental incident power density from frequencies below 3 GHz to higher frequencies will lead to a relative increase in absorbed power of a factor higher than 3. In 2011, I have shown that active mobile phone handsets have a dramatic impact on the behaviour of bees, namely by inducing the worker piping signal [8]. These initial observations were substantiated by additional experiments that were performed with the controlled enhancement of the local RF-EMF signals [9]. In natural conditions, worker piping either announces the swarming process of the bee colony or is a signal of a disturbed bee colony [10], [11]. In order to assess, whether the increased radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation in the environment has an impact on the behaviour of honeybees, a broad spectral frequency microphone was placed in a hive during the New Year’s Eve night of 2019, to investigate whether and to what degree the increased amount of local wireless communications might have an effect on the honeybees’ behaviour around midnight, local time. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe
recording of a honeybee colony during the New Year’s Eve 2019 took place in a
rural area of Switzerland, close to the city of Montreux and at an
altitude of 960 m above sea level. This location is surrounded by small
mountains (Les Pléiades, Le Folly and Le Cubly, at 1362, 1730 and 1187 m above
sea level, respectively). There is only one local emitting antenna in direct
view (CH1093+ / LV95 ; https://www.bakom.admin.ch/bakom/en/homepage/frequencies-and-antennas/location-of-radio-transmitters.html), located more than 800 m
away from the hive (Fig. 1a). The device employed for the recording of the
honeybees’ sounds consisted of a bidirectional compact microphone (Olympus
ME-31) with frequency response from 70 to 15,000 Hz connected to a vocal
recorder (Olympus LS-11). The microphone was placed in the bottom part
of the hive (Figs. 1b and c). The vocal recorder was connected to an external battery (Panasonic
LC-R123R4P; https://na.industrial.panasonic.com/) via a 12V-to-4.5V voltage
converter (Dupertuis Electronique S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland) (Fig. 1d). Figure 1: Location of the honeybee
colony and experimental setup. a, Overview of the measurement location
(source : Swiss Federal Office of Topography, https://shop.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/products/maps/overview/municipality_map
; geodata © swisstopo). The rural location at 1000 m above sea level is lying
within mountains (Les Pléiades, Le Folly and Le Cubly); there is only one
emitting antenna mast (for 2G, 3G and 4G) in direct view, more than 800 m away
from the honeybee colony. b, Experimental setup, with positioning of the
microphone under the bottom grid in the hive, above which is the honeybee
colony. c, Microphone positioning in the back side of the hive
(Dadant-Blatt model). d, Set up of the recording device. Electric
current is provided by a 12 Volts battery and the voltage necessary for the
recording device is set to 4.5 Volts with the help of a voltage converter. The
recorded signal was digitized as a Waveform audio file format sound file with
44,1 kHz recording mode. The open source, cross platform audio software
Audacity (https://www.audacityteam.org/) was employed for the manual analysis
of the sound files and for the generation of the audiograms (also called
sonograms) and spectrograms (oscillograms). The
computer program FFT Properties 5.0 (Dew Research LLC, SLO-3210 Slovenske
Konjice, Slovenia) was employed for the generation and the analysis of the
orbital phase (which is a visualization of the signal strength during a given
period). Intensity
values of audiograms might slightly vary throughout the whole recordings in the
hive, depending on the clustering of the bees in the hive during winter. The
sound files are freely available at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5mkkwh748. In the geographic area where
the recordings took place, the bees (Apis mellifera carnica) usually
begin to forage to collect nectar and pollen in early March, depending on the
weather conditions. All applicable national guidelines for the care and use of
honeybees were followed. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSThe fundamental frequency of Apis mellifera carnica
was in the range of 70 to 100 Hertz (Hz). Dramatic changes in the fundamental
intensity and frequency patterns of the sounds produced in the hive were recorded
before, during and after the local New Year’s Eve. It was indeed observed based
on the recorded signals that the honeybees were significantly disturbed around
midnight (local time), since the colony emitted a strong and long lasting
(about 15 minutes) worker piping signal (Fig. 2). Figure
2: World time zones correlated with spectrogram and
audiogram of hive sounds. a, World time zones (source: Map of current
official time zones, US Central Intelligence Agency,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Time_Zones_Map.png from the freely
licensed media file repository Wikimedia Commons) with Coordinated Universal
Time (UTC). The map is flipped horizontally in order to reflect the progression
of the New Year’s Eve around the terrestrial globe. b, Spectrogram of
honeybee colony sounds. Spectrogram
is reported in kiloHertz (kHz). Local time is reported horizontally, from the
left to the right. Local New Year’s Eve at 00:00
(24-hour clock) is indicated with a vertical red line. c, Audiogram of
honeybee colony sounds. Audiogram is normalized (-0.25 to 0.25). Local time is
corresponding to Panel b. d, Spectrograms from five different
time points. Spectrograms are reported in kiloHertz (kHz). Sounds lasting
fifteen seconds each and starting at 17:03:00, 21:40:00, 01:22:55, 03:53:50 and
05:16:35 (hh.mm.ss) were analyzed. e, Orbital phase analyses of
honeybees’ sounds (see panel d). f, Sound files (see panel d). Very surprisingly, the bees seemed to have also been
disturbed on several other occasions before and after local midnight, as seen
with the increase of the sound intensities and also the frequencies produced by
the honeybee colony (Figs. 2a and 2b, respectively). These sounds might be
correlated to the succeeding locations of the New Year’s Eve celebrations
around the globe : about seven (China), five (India), three and a half (Iran),
three (Center of Russia, Saudi Arabia, East of Africa, Madagascar), two
(Finland, Baltic States, Ukraine, Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, etc.) hours before,
and about one (United Kingdom) and three (Brazil, Argentina) hours after the
local New Year’s Eve, respectively. Listening to the sound files themselves
further substantiates these observations (Figs. 2d and 2e) which to the best of
these authors’ knowledge, cannot be explained by natural causes. For controls, twelve additional and similar recordings
were performed with the same hive throughout the following weeks until
mid-February. This revealed that the patterns of the sounds and frequencies
produced by the honeybee colony did not show the peaks that were observed
during the night of the New Year’s Eve (Fig. 3). Figure 3: Spectrograms and
audiograms of hive sounds. Spectrograms are reported in kiloHertz (kHz). Audiograms are normalized
(-0.2 to 0.2). Local time is reported horizontally, from the left to the right.
Local midnight (00:00 ; 24-hour clock) is indicated with a vertical red line. a,
4 to 5 of January. b, 8 to 9 of January. c, 10 to 11 of January. d,
12 to 13 of January. e, 16 to 17 of January. A tractor was noisy in the
surroundings. f, 17 to 18 of January. Rain in the early morning was
audible. g, 18 to 19 of January. h, 21 to 22 of January. All
dates are in the year 2020. Figure 3 (continued):
Spectrograms and audiograms of hive sounds. Spectrograms are reported in kiloHertz (kHz).
Audiograms are normalized (-0.2 to 0.2). Local time is reported horizontally,
from the left to the right. Local midnight (00:00 ; 24-hour clock) is indicated
with a vertical red line. i, 31 of January to 1 of February. j, 2
to 3 of February. Rain during the night. k, 6 to 7 of February. l,
11 to 12 of February. All dates are in the year 2020. It is hypothesized here that the honeybees were
subjected not only to local but to global anthropogenic environmental RF-EMFs
exposure occurring from New Year’s Eve festivities around the globe. Indeed,
the worker piping signals produced by honeybees is usually a signal that is
produced shortly before takeoff of a swarm [10], or
is associated with disturbance of the
hive by, for example, intruders or jarring [11].
The induction of honeybee worker piping by enhanced electromagnetic fields
might have dramatic consequences in terms of colony losses due to unexpected
swarming. It is therefore time to assess the planetary electromagnetic
pollution, since the Internet of Things and 5G will add millions more
radiofrequency transmitters around and radiating with unprecedented increased power density above us, and since radio
frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have increased by several orders of
magnitude over the last 50 years [12].
Current studies lack in the consideration of potential effects which may
directly affect other organisms or ecosystems, because of the very limited
attention which is usually received by the adverse ecological effects of RF-EMF
[13]. Hallmann
et al. have observed a seasonal decline
of 76%, and mid-summer decline of 82% in flying insect biomass over the 27
years of their study [14]. These authors showed that this decline was
apparent regardless of habitat type, while changes in weather, land use, and
habitat characteristics cannot explain this overall decline. It is obvious that in the future, thorough independent
scientific investigations must be conducted in order to confirm or refute the
working hypothesis : do RF-EMFs emitted not only locally, but worldwide, have the ability to disturb the
behavior of honeybees ? Several critical parameters should be concomitantly analysed in the
close vicinity of the honeybees participating in these studies, such as :
i) the permanent measurement of the levels of exposure to radiofrequency
electromagnetic radiations (around various frequency bands) ; ii) the
analysis of the environmental electric and magnetic fields, and their
variations ; iii) the examination of the putative involvement of natural
atmospheric events such as, for example, the variations in the radio atmospheric
signals, the so-called spherics [15]. There might be an unknown planetary electromagnetic mechanism for the
generation of the observed sound effects in a bee colony. Indeed, honeybees have magnetic remanence [16] and can be trained to respond to very small changes in
geomagnetic-field intensity, with the detection of an anomaly of 0.06% of
background [17]. Honeybees do possess a magnetoreception system [18] and have been shown capable of detecting weak electric fields [19]. Evidence
of proof of such electromagnetic waves taking place at New Year's Eve should be
investigated worldwide during forthcoming similar events based on a global
network of long term EM measurements. Protocols and methodologies are available for
thoroughly performing such investigations [20], [21], [22]. Further
verification of the above working hypothesis by implementing such measurements
in a global monitoring network will be important for a mechanistic
understanding of the interaction of RF fields with ecosystems [23]. 4. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONSThe
present study has revealed disturbing behaviour by honeybees which were very
likely caused by increased wireless phone EM radiation during New Year’s Eve
celebrations around the globe. To the best of these authors’ knowledge, this
behaviour could not be explained by natural causes. The
forthcoming deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including
5G from space satellites, will increase exposure to radio frequency (RF)
radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already
in place. These RF radiations might be harmful for the biosphere. There is
therefore an urgent need to address the so-called anthropogenic electrosmog [12]. The risk assessment and
regulation of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields should be carefully
evaluated and coordinated under international scrutiny. Increasing
RF-EM radiation power worldwide and the upcoming 5G rollout may present a
serious challenge not only for honeybees but public health in general [24]. APPENDICESSupplementary Materials: The original sound files are available online at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5mkkwh748 Appendix A Audio file 1. Recording of honey bees during the New Year’s Eve 2019. Recording is starting at 5:03:00 AM and is lasting 15 seconds Audio file 2. Recording of honey bees during the New Year’s Eve 2019. Recording is starting at 9:40:00 AM and is lasting 15 seconds Audio file 3. Recording of honey bees during the New Year’s Eve 2019. Recording is starting at 00:22:55 PM and is lasting 15 seconds Audio file 4. Recording of honey bees during the New Year’s Eve 2019. Recording is starting at 01:53:50 PM and is lasting 15 seconds Audio file 5. Recording of honey bees during the New Year’s Eve 2019. Recording is starting at 03:16:35 PM and is lasting 15 seconds Large audio file entitled "Honeybees New Year's Eve 2019 Favre". Full recording of the honeybees in the hive, starting 17.00 local time the 31st of December, 2019. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
The first author is Dr. in Biology, teacher, independent researcher, apiary adviser in the canton de Vaud (Switzerland), president (since 2010) of the not-for-profit association Alerte Romande aux Rayonnements Artificiels (A.R.R.A., formerly A.R.A; www.alerte.ch), and member of the scientific advisory board of the not-for-profit association FreeTheBees (www.freethebees.ch). The second author is an Associate Professor, retired from the Karolinska Institute (in Nov 2017, still active), Department of Neuroscience, head of The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden, and Adjunct Professor, previously at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. SOURCES OF FUNDINGThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors have declared that no competing interests exist. ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work was performed
under the full responsibility of the two authors. Daniel Favre is very grateful
to Jean-Claude Perez, Ph.D. (Bordeaux, France) for his support in the
correction of the manuscript. The International 5G Appeal
(https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/) gave us the final inspiration for undertaking
this current research study. REFERENCES [11] Wenner, A.M. Sound Communication
in Honeybees. Scientific American, 210, 1964, 116-124.
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License © Granthaalayah 2014-2020. All Rights Reserved. |