Article Type: Research Article Article Citation: Lyra Paz P. Lluz.
(2020). SURVIVING AND QUITTING: THE CASE OF 4PS (PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO
PROGRAM) STUDENT DROPOUTS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(8),
297-301. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i8.2020.971 Received Date: 03 August 2020 Accepted Date: 31 August 2020 Keywords: Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4ps) Dropout Student Poverty The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is a version of cash transfer program here in the Philippines that aims to eradicate extreme poverty by investing in health and education. This study focused on personal experiences of students as 4Ps beneficiaries and factors that have led to their dropping out from school. A qualitative method was employed utilizing a case study design, where data was gathered from six (6) student dropouts who were 4Ps beneficiaries. Results revealed that most student beneficiaries of the 4Ps are from indigent families, highlighted that factors were due to family living conditions, the desire to help the parents and siblings. Family living conditions, the poor standard of living still is a pressing problem that can led students to drop out from school, even with the availability of financial assistance that still links to poverty as an underlying factor.
1. INTRODUCTIONPoverty has been one of the major problems and societal concerns in the country. Among various indicators of poverty, Filipinos were found to be most deprived in gaining access to education, the new multidimensional poverty index (MPI) created by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) showed. Poverty is a condition in which people lack the basic things in order to survive such as food, shelter, water, clothes and education (Crossman, 2014). Dela Torre (2016) noted that most of the problems and
difficulties of Filipinos are rooted in poverty. Many families are left
deprived of their basic needs and therefore forced their children to stop going
to school and help them instead in their livelihood. With this main ground, the
Philippine government initiated a program called the Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program or 4P’s both to address
poverty and in response to the country’s commitment to the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs). The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps) is a human development measure of the national government that
provides conditional cash grants to the poorest of the poor, to improve the
health, nutrition, and the education of children aged 0-18. It is patterned
after the conditional cash transfer (CCT) schemes in Latin American and African
countries, which have lifted millions of people around the world from poverty.
4Ps is a version of cash transfer program here in the Philippines under the
Department of Social Welfare and Development, its aim is to eradicate extreme
poverty in the Philippines by investing in health and education particularly to
children from 0-18 years old (Montilla, et.al, 2015). Children of the 4Ps beneficiaries are referred to Commission on Higher Education
(CHED) which is also DSWD’s partner in the project along with the Department of
Labor and Employment (DOLE) and the implementing state universities and
colleges (SUCs). Under the said program, it ensures that the grantees
are enrolled in selected SUCs duly recognized by CHED, channeled to CHED priority courses, and be extended the needed
support that will guarantee completion of studies, thus qualify them for
high-value added jobs in the future. (Junio, 2014). In
partnership with the Commission on Higher Education, the Department of Labor
and Employment, and the Philippine Association of State Universities and
Colleges, 4Ps has enrolled 36,003 beneficiaries in state universities and
colleges as of June 2015 (officialgazette.gov.ph). The program has strict compliance when it
comes to the school attendance of the students who are beneficiaries because it
is their basis in giving the cash transfer. It is therefore expected for the
beneficiaries to attend school regularly or at least 85% of the school days.
There are studies that shows how the 4Ps program affects the school attendance
and the performance of the student. Northern
Samar as one of the poorest provinces in the country is a beneficiary of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps) covering 44,928 households, out of which 79,607 are children
beneficiaries for educational grants in all school levels in 24 municipalities
(Diaz, 2018). Most college student 4Ps beneficiaries are enrolled in the
University of Eastern Philippines campuses. About 50% of the student population
are 4Ps grantees, receiving monthly stipend and necessary support for
school-related activities and these students were the priority beneficiaries of
the Tertiary Education Subsidy (TES). Enrollment was seen to increase with the
4Ps implementation, but while enrollment and school
facilities are increasing, some children remain out of school and there are
still many cases of drop-outs. With the
cases of students dropping out from school despite the support given, at a
closer look, there can be underlying reasons for such. To address this gap,
this study aims to explore and describe these underlying factors that have led
to their dropping out from school. 2.
METHODOLOGY
This study is anchored on the pull-out theories of student dropping, which associate the student’s decision to leave school with factors such as: early marriage, having a baby, financial issues, the need to get employed in order to support their family. The pull-out theories assume the fact that students underlie the decision to stay in school or not on a cost – benefit analysis [McNEal, 1997; Mihalic & Elliott, 1997]. These theories consider the individual in a contextual way, in which school is an important part of his life, along with his family, colleagues, church and other organizations. A job or the family responsibilities, for instance, are able to get the student out of school. On the other hand, this study is also anchored on the push-out theories which consider that the school is to blame for the dropout because it discourages students regarding continuing studies using as argument their personality traits. Internal institutional factors, such as the behavioral policies or the conflicts between students or teachers, may push the students outside the school. The pushout theoreticians claim that the students leave school not due to their individual attributes but because of the school structure [Fine, 1991]. Jordan, Lara and McPartland (1996) define the push effects as school related factors with negative impact upon the bond that teenagers achieve with the school environment and makes them reject the school context. These factors may be structural, contextual, climate related or individualized and may determine some students to consider school as an unwelcoming place [Stearns & Glennie, 2006]. 2.1. RESEARCH DESIGN
This study employed a qualitative design which follows a
systematic subjective approach to capture relevant data. A case study research
will allow the researchers to focus on a specific area or situation for an
in-depth analysis (Heigham, et.al., 2009). Case study
research is said to allow for in-depth review of new or unclear phenomena while
retaining the holistic and meaningful characteristics of real-life events
(Hartley, 2004). This design is employed in this study, as this aims to explore
and describe personal experiences of students as 4Ps
beneficiaries and factors that have led to their dropping out from school. 2.2. RESEARCH PROCEDURE
The researcher employed purposive sampling in order to
collect relevant data from the participants. Chosen participants were students
who dropped out from school who were 4Ps beneficiaries, selected from the
previous semester records. The researcher selected ten (10) student dropouts,
but was able to reach only six (6) of them and the researcher also conducted an
interview with the six (6) chosen participants who were found in their
respective homes and the interview was personally administered by the
researcher. First, they were invited to be part of the study and were informed
of its nature, their rights and were ensured of the confidentiality of their
responses. The participants personally consented to the interview. 2.3. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
An interview guide was utilized in this study. It consisted
of preparatory questions which established rapport between the interviewer and
the interviewee. The participant was asked of questions about the time they
have been in school and their being 4Ps grantees, which further led to
questions about factors that cause their dropping out from school. A transcript was produced from the interview sessions that
served as sources of data in coming up with codes and themes that helped the
researcher synthesize answers to the research questions. 2.4. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS The information that were used in this research were the individual views of participants on the issues related to the subject. Hence, in the interest of future predicaments that may arose based on the impressions of the readers, the identities of the participants were not divulged in this study. The researcher reserved the right to protect the participants and the confidentiality of their responses in general. 2.5. DATA ANALYSIS
Data from the interview were transcribed and analyzed through thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is the process of identifying patterns or themes within qualitative data (Braun & Clarke (2006). The goal of a thematic analysis is to identify themes, i.e. patterns in the data that are important or interesting, and use these themes to address the research or say something about an issue. This is much more than simply summarizing the data; a good thematic analysis interprets and makes sense of it (Clarke & Braun, 2013). 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONInformation gathered from the respondents through in-depth interview was processed through its methodology to gather reliable results and validation of the questions in terms of clarity, understandability, and appropriateness (Creswell, 2013). The following presentations are the results and discussions that came out of the analysis. Theme 1: ‘4ps
helped students in many ways.’ Participants claimed that the program was a big help to them in their stay in school. “I was so thankful I was chosen that time as a grantee of the financial assistance, more that my parents really can’t send me to school” (Nagpasalamat gud ak sadto nga nahiapi ak, kay sugad ko maka iskwela na ak, kay dire man gud kaya san ak mga kag-anak), P1 said. “Yes, it was really helpful”, P2 added. Responses of the participants highlighted that the program
was beneficial to students. “We receive
monthly stipend, although sometimes it does not arrive on time, but it was
really a big help” P3 said. “I use
the assistance for my school needs, but most of the time, I give it to my
parents and they spend it for some of our basic needs, it really helped me a
lot as a student and my family as well.” The participants responded mostly positive things about the program. The financial assistance was able to help them with their daily needs in school, pay their school contributions, for their daily fare and school projects. Throughout the interview, it was noted that participants do have positive views of the effects of 4Ps to their education and that they see it helpful. Theme 2: ‘Students
need more to sustain interest for schooling.’ Despite the positive remarks of the participants about the program, their responses eventually led to several factors why despite the financial support given, they quit school and decided not to continue. It may sound unusual why despite the support extended by the government, still students cannot sustain their schooling, when the financial burden has been lifted. “I dropped because I don’t feel going to school at all. Yes, there is 4Ps, but I have to help my parents work for our daily needs. Practically, I have to work,” a participant exclaimed. “My parents said I have to go to school, but for me, I find it impractical when I see my younger siblings need my help,” another participant said. “I lose interest, just that I felt there is no sense going to school when I can earn working in the field. 4Ps can pay my tuition and school needs, but I eat daily, we have other needs.” Most of the participants were from indigent families, with parents who earn lower than the minimal income. Responses highlighted that the financial assistance really was not enough to motivate them to continue schooling. Theme 3: ‘Staying
in school is a choice that may be affected by related factors.’ ‘I would like to stay.
I would like to finish college, but I need to help my parents.” This
response clearly distinguishes one’s choice of quitting from school than stay. “Our living condition, my parents need me,
my younger siblings have to go to school, so I decided to quit school and work.
This way I can help them,” a participant said. “It was my choice to drop from school. I have to help my parents,” another participant added. Most of the participants mentioned family reasons related to their living conditions as the pressing factor that cause them to drop from school. Related factors like the need to help their parents and their younger siblings were highlighted in their responses. The pull-out theories of student dropping associates student’s decision to leave school with factors such as: early marriage, having a baby, financial issues, and the need to get employed in order to support their family. The pull-out theories assume the fact that students underlie the decision to stay in school or not on a cost – benefit analysis. From the participants, their responses were along this area. Considering that most student beneficiaries of the 4Ps are from indigent families, they still have needs that pressed them to quit from school despite the financial assistance provided. It was quite clear that factors do not incline to the push-out theory which consider that the school is to blame for the dropout because it discourages students regarding continuing studies using as argument their personality traits. The interview with the six (6) student dropouts highlighted that factors were due to family living conditions, the desire to help the parents and siblings. Despite the fact that there was the financial assistance, participants weighed the benefit of dropping out from school and work to help their parents. In reality, cases like these cannot be avoided especially that there are other needs that seem much more important than staying in school. Poverty and dropouts are inextricably connected in the three primary settings affecting healthy child and adolescent development: families, schools and communities. In 2009, poor students were five times more likely to drop out of high school than high-income students (Chapman, Laird, Ifill, & KewalRamani, 2011). 4. CONCLUSIONThe Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is beneficial to students, however there are cases that students may find dropping out from school an option better than staying. Surviving school is not an option for students who chose to quit school and find it more practical. Family living conditions, the poor standard of living still is a pressing problem that can led students to drop out from school, even with the availability of financial assistance that still links to poverty as an underlying factor. SOURCES OF FUNDINGThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe author have declared that no competing interests exist. ACKNOWLEDGMENTNone. REFERENCES
[1]
Chapman,
C., Laird, J., Ifill, N., & Kewal Ramani, A.
(2011). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United
States: 1972-2009. (NCES 2012-06). Washington, D.C.: National Center for
Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
Education. Retrieved [date]. Source:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2012006
[2]
Creswell,
J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among the Five
Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. (pp. 77-83)
[3]
Crossman,
A. (2014). Poverty. Available:
http://sociology.about.com/od/P_Index/g/Poverty.htm Retrived:
August 25, 2015
[4]
Diaz, A.
(2018). DSWD sums up 4Ps gains in Northern Samar, Philippine Information Agency
8- Northern Samar
[5]
Dela
Torre, B. (2016). Financing Education through the Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)
[6]
Doll,Eslami, & Walters, 2013. Understanding Why
students Drop Out of High School, According to Their Own reports: Are They
Pushed or Pulled, or Do They Fall Out? A Comparative Analysis of Seven
Nationally Representative Studies.
[7]
Heigham, J. et
al. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics A Practical
Introduction; Palgrave Macmillan
[8]
Jordan,
W. J.; Lara Julia; McPartland, J. M. (1996) -„Exploring the causes of early
dropout among race -ethnic and gender groups” IN Youth & Society 28(1):
6-94
[9]
Junio,
L. (2014). Philippine News Agency
[10] Fernandez, L. & Olfindo,
R. (2011). Overview of the Philippines’ conditional cash transfer program: The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (Pantawid Pamilya).
Washington DC. World Bank.
[11] Montella, M., Delavin, E.,Villanueva ,R., & Turco,
R.(2015) Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to Pupil’s Education
[12] Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students
drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
[13] Sampson, R.J., Morenoff,
J.D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing "neighborhood
effects": Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review
of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
[14] Stearns Elizabeth, Glennie Elizabeth J.
(2006) -„When and Why Dropouts Leave High School” IN Youth & Society Volume
38 Number 1 September, 29-57
[15] Velarde, R. & Fernandez, L. (2011).
Philippines- welfare and distributional impacts of the pantawid
pamilyang pilipino program.
Available: http: www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSeContentServes/WDSP/IB/2012//06/11/000426104/Rendered/PDF/694230BRIOP1180ang0Program.pdfRetrieved:
May 24,2019
[16] https://www.academia.edu/35431416/THE_HARDSHIPS_AND_BENEFITS_OF_4PS_STUDENT-BENEFICIARIES
Retrived: August 25, 2019
[17] Philippine Institute for Philippine Studies,
https://www.pids.gov.ph/press-releases/328
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License © Granthaalayah 2014-2020. All Rights Reserved. |