Article Type: Case Study Article Citation: Jigyasa Shukla, and
Professor Harsh Gupta. (2020). STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF STRENGTH
PROPERTIES IN CALCINED KAOLIN AND SILICA FUME. International Journal of
Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(6), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i6.2020.575 Received Date: 11 May 2020 Accepted Date: 30 June 2020 Keywords: Silica Fume Durability Compressive Strength Flexural Strength This paper present the study of various strength such as compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength during 7 and 28 day. It is construct the specimens size 15cm X 15cm X 15cm for testing purpose which depend upon the size of aggregate. Test results are indicated that strength performance of concrete well as in durability aspect are improved using of Silica fume.
1. INTRODUCTIONSilica fume, durability and Compressive strength etc are studying and analyze. The mix (M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5) are used to analyze and absorb the optimum mix for construction using of some Calcined Kaolin, Sand and Aggregate. 2.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FORMULA
Compressive Strength = Load / Cross-sectional
Area 3. PROCEDUREThe cubical moulds of size 15cm x 15cm x 15cm are used for testing and analyzing. The concrete is poured and mould with tempered properly to remove any voids, after this 24-hour cubical moulds are removed and test specimens are putting in water for curing purpose. All specimens are tested with the help of compression testing machine after 7 days curing and 28 days curing. The load (150 kg/cm2 per minute) are applied gradually at till the Specimens fails.
Figure 1: Specimens 4. PREPARATION
Figure 7: First
to Fifth Specimens 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTable 1: Properties of Cement
Table 2: Properties of Fine
Aggregate
Table 3: Properties of Silica
Fume
Table 4: Properties of Super
Plasticizer
Table 5: Mix Proportioning
Table 6: Results of
Compressive Strength (7 days)
Figure
8: Results of Compressive Strength (7 days) Table 7: Results of
Compressive Strength (28 days)
Figure
9: Results of Compressive Strength (28 days) Table 8: Results of Split
tensile Strength (7 days)
Figure
10: Results of Split tensile Strength (7 days) Table 9: Results of Split
tensile Strength (28 days)
Figure
11: Results of Split tensile Strength (28 days) Table 10: Results of Flexural
Strength (7 days)
Figure
12: Results of Flexural Strength (7 days) Table 11: Results of Flexural
Strength (28 days)
Figure
13: Results of Flexural Strength (28 days) 6. CONCLUSIONSWe are construct the specimens size 15cm X 15cm X 15cm which depend upon the size of aggregate. These specimens is poured in the mould and tempered properly during 24 hours. These specimens are tested using of compression testing machine after 7 days curing and after 28 days curing, after this optimum result are finding out using of Mix (M4) which is shown Table 6-11, and Figure 8-13. SOURCES OF FUNDINGNone. CONFLICT OF INTERESTNone. ACKNOWLEDGMENTNone. REFERENCES
[1]
K. H.
1995. “Effects of anti-washout admixtures on fresh concrete properties.” ACI
Mater. J., pp 164–171.
[2]
Assaad, J. 2003.
“Relationship between washout resistance and rheological properties of
high-performance underwater concrete.” ACI Mater. J., pp 185–193.
[3]
Ballivy, G. 1996.
“High-performance cement grout for underwater crack injection.” Proc., 3rd
CANMET/ACI Int. Conf. on Performance of Concrete in Marine Environment, V. M.
Malhotra, ed., ACI, Farmington Hills, Mich., pp 138–162.
[4]
Hadriche, M. S.
1999. “Factorial design models for proportioning self-consolidating concrete.”
Mater. Struct., pp 679–686.
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License © Granthaalayah 2014-2020. All Rights Reserved. |