HUMAN ENERGY UTILIZATION AND EFFECTIVENESS IN SMALL AND MARGINAL FARM HOLDINGS

Tandra Mondal; Pranab Kumar Nag

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i11.2018.1114

Authors

Tandra Mondal IRDM Faculty Centre, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Narendrapur, Kolkata-700103, India
Pranab Kumar Nag IRDM Faculty Centre, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Narendrapur, Kolkata-700103, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i11.2018.1114

Keywords:

Farm Mechanization, Small and Marginal Holdings, Work Severity, Drudgery-Proneness

Abstract [English]

In India, small and marginal farmers have emerged as a distinct and dominant category. While farm mechanization represents a rapid transformation from traditional to modern methods of farming, it is not uniform across the crops and regions. The level of mechanization, however, remains scattered due to the compulsiveness to the situation dominated by the economic layout of farm holdings, land size, and large-scale deprivation of access to the technology suitable to small holdings. This present contribution elucidates the extent of use tools and machinery among the rice farmers of the state of Wes Bengal, India. Analysis revealed that the total number of man-days involved in paddy cultivation was 120-140 per ha, i.e., 900-1000 man-hours depending upon the availability of labour, tools, and machinery used for the individual operation. Analysis of farm work in small and marginal holdings evolved that over 90% of the total number of farmers use either tractor or power tiller for land preparation. Use of the animal-drawn country plough is gradually phased out in the study regions. For sowing and transplanting operations are primarily manual methods using hand tools. The study provided an insight of the issues of work methods and practices of the farmworkers in small and marginal farm holdings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akdemir, B. (2013). Agricultural mechanization in Turkey. IERI Procedia, 5, 41-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2013.11.067

Dixon, J., K. Taniguchi, and H. Wattenbach. (eds). (2003). Approaches to assessing the impact of globalization on African smallholders: Household and village economy modelling. Proceedings of a working session on Globalization and the African Smallholder Study. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

Fortune, C., & Tawanda, D. (2013). An Assessment of Agricultural Mechanization Index and Evaluation of Agricultural Productivity of some Fast Track Resettlement Farms in Bindura District of Mashonaland Central Province: Zimbabwe. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(7), 62-82.

Foster, A., Rosenzweig, M. (2010b). Barriers to farm profitability in India: mechanization, scale and credit markets. In: Paper Presented at the Conference Agriculture for Development – Revisited, University of California at Berkeley, CA, October 1–2.

Ghatak, M., & Roy, S. (2007). Land reform and agricultural productivity in India: a review of the evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 251-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm017

The government of India. (2017). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2016. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture. New Delhi, India.

Hazell, P. B., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2007). The Future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) 2020 Discussion Paper 42, May 2007. Washington D.C.: IFPRI.

Hormozi, M. A., Asoodar, M. A., & Abdeshahi, A. (2012). Impact of mechanization on technical efficiency: A case study of rice farmers in Iran. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 176-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00021-4

Kawasaki, K. (2010). The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4), 509-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00509.x

Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Raney, T. (2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 16-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041

Mehta, C. R., Chandel, N. S., & Senthilkumar, T. (2014). Status, challenges and strategies for farm mechanization in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 45(4), 43-50.

Mottaleb, K. A., Krupnik, T. J., & Erenstein, O. (2016). Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings. Journal of rural studies, 46, 155-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.012

Muazu, A., Yahya, A., Ishak, W. I. W., & Khairunniza-Bejo, S. (2014). Machinery Utilization and Production Cost of Wetland, Direct Seeding Paddy Cultivation in Malaysia. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2, 361-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.050

Nag P. K., Sebastian N. C. & Mavlankar M. G. (1980). Occupational workload of Indian agricultural workers, Ergonomics, 23:2, 91-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138008924724

Nag, P. K., & Nag, A. (2004). Drudgery, accidents and injuries in Indian agriculture. Industrial Health, 42(2), 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.42.149

Paman, U., Inaba, S., & Uchida, S. (2014). The mechanization of small-scale rice farming: Labor requirements and costs. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 7(3), 122-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2014.03.001

Pimentel, D., Doughty, R., Carothers, C., Lamberson, S., Bora, N., and Lee, K. ( 2002). Energy inputs in crop production: comparison of developed and developing countries, In Lal, R., Hansen, D., Uphoff, N., and Slack, S.(Eds.), Food Security and Environmental Quality in the Developing World (pp.129–151), Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032215.ch8

Schmitz, A., & Moss, C. B. (2016). Mechanized agriculture: Machine adoption, farm size, and labor displacement. The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics. 18(3), 278-296.

Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors—A case study in India. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 99-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.003

Singh, J. (2005). Scope, progress and constraints of farm mechanization in India. In Tyagi, K., H. Bathla., and Sharma, S. (Eds.), Status of Farm Mechanization in India (48-56). Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute: New Delhi.

Tewari, V. K., Kumar, A. A., Kumar, S. P., & Nare, B. (2012). Farm mechanization status of West Bengal in India. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review, 1(6), 139-146.

Thapa, G. (2009). Smallholder farming in transforming economies of Asia and the Pacific challenges and opportunities. In: Discussion Paper Prepared for the Side Event Organized during the Thirty-third Session of IFAD's Governing Council, 18 February 2009. Rome. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).

Van den Berg, M. M., Hengsdijk, H., Wolf, J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Guanghuo, W., & Roetter, R. P. (2007). The impact of increasing farm size and mechanization on rural income and rice production in Zhejiang province, China. Agricultural Systems, 94(3), 841-850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.010

Yadav, S. N., Chandra, R., Khura, T. K., & Chauhan, N. S. (2013). Energy input–output analysis and mechanization status for cultivation of rice and maize crops in Sikkim. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 15(3), 108-116.

World Bank. (2003). Reaching the rural poor: A renewed strategy for rural development. Washington, DC.