SOCIO-ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING CAESAREAN SECTION BIRTHS IN AFRICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i11.2018.1128Keywords:
Caesarean Section, Vaginal Delivery, Medicalization, Society, Ethics, Medical Indications, Health, EconomyAbstract [English]
In the last decade, a number of studies have questioned the practice of caesarean section birth in obstetrical practices in Africa. Medical sociologists and anthropologists have considered caesarean section as a medicalization of social events. We are not assuming that it is true of false. The transformation of social events into medical indications rises ethical issues in the provision of healthcare in Africa. In this paper, we especially used the case of caesarean section birth to explore the transformation of social events into medical indications in Africa. Caesarean sections by choice interrogates the obstetrical practices. This paper examines the socio-ethical issues in caesarean section in Africa. We considered some underlying factors: medicalization of the society, informed consent, biotechnology, demand inducement, consumer-inducement demand and the health market-driven economy. This was desk-based study. A review of secondary data and literatures relative to caesarean section births in Africa were used for discussion. Findings from literatures revealed that a number of considerations have to be taken such as: demand inducement and information asymmetry, defensive and corporate medicine, medical power, consumer induced demand and health market driven economy. The findings informed health regulators on demand and supply sides of caesarean sections.
Downloads
References
American College of Nurse-Midwives (2003). Elective Cesarean place mothers and babies at risk www.midwife.org
Amita R., Sunny J. (2017). Analysis of caesarian-section rates according to Robson’s ten group classification system and evaluating the indication within the group. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Volume 6. Issue 2, pp. 447-451
Badi,V.,R.,& Badi, V., N.,(2009), Business Ethics, Vrinda Publications (P) Ltd.
Beauchamp,T.,l., &, Childress, J.,F., (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, (4th Ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Betran P. A., YE J., Moller B. A., Zhang J., Metin G. A. (2016). The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates, Global, Regional and National Estimates 1990-2014. Plos One. Journal. Dol. 10, pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu P. (1996). Understanding, Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 2, pp. 17-37.
Byanjankar S., Yu B. (2017). Factors Affecting Trends of Caesarean Section: A Review. Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing. 2017, Vol43, 53-97.
Fisher,C., & Lovell, A., (2009). Business Ethics and values: Individual, corporate and International Perspectives, (3rd Ed.). Edinburgh Gate, England: Pearson Education Ltd.
Foucault M. (1975). The Birth and the Clinic, Vintage Books, New York.
Foucault M. (1986). The Archeology of knowledge, Tavistock, London
Foucault M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, Vintage Books, New York.
Foucault M. (2000). Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984. Power, vol. 3, Penguin Books, London.
Friedson E. (1961). Patents’ View of Medical Practice. New York, Sage.
Friedson E. (1970). Profession of Medicine: A Study of in the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York, Dood Mead.
Friedson E. (1983). The theory of professions – state of the art, in Dingwall R.and Lewis P. (eds) The Sociology of Professions. London, MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16979-5_2
Friedson E. (1986). Professional Powers. The Institutionalization of formal Knowledge. London, University of Chicago.
Gjonej R., Poloska A., Keta M., Delija Z., Zyberaj F., Beshan V. Smakaj E. (2015). The reasons of rising trend of caesarean section rate year after year. A retrospective study. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2015. Vol. 7(1), pp. 7-15.
Haring, B., (1974). Medical Ethics. Slough, England: St. Paul Publications.
Helle S., Vibeke S. (2004). The relevance of Foucault and Bourdieu for medical anthropology: Exploring new sites. Anthropology and Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3-10.
Holmes,H., B., & Purdy, L., M., (1992). Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana Universities Press.
Kaur K. (2013). Current trend of caesarean section and vaginal births. Pelagin Research Library. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2013, (4), 196-202.
Margo S., Goldenberg R. (2016). Caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa. Maternal Health Neonatology and Perinatology. 2016, 26, pp. 2-10. WHO (2015).
Meeta G., Garg V. (2017). The rate and indications of caesarean section in a tertiary hospital at Jaipur, India. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017 (5)1786-1792.
Monge, A., M., (1991). Ethical Practice in health and disease. Manila: Sinag-Tala Publishers, Inc.
Olafson, A., F., (1970). Principles and persons: an ethical interpretation of extentialism, The Johns Hopkins Press Ltd: London.
Osonwa O. K., Eku J., Ekeng P. E. (2016). Trends in caesarean section at Calabar General Hospital, Cross River State, Nigeria. European Journal of Biology and Medical Science Research. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-5.
Parson T. (1952). Illness, Therapy and the Modern Urban Family, Journal of Social Issues, 8, pp. 31-44
Pellegrino, E., D., & David, C., T., (1993). The Virtues in Medical Practice: An extension of Aristotelian and Scholastic analyses of virtue to physicians. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pfummer A., Wier L. M., Stocks C. (2013). Most Frequent Procedures performed in US Hospitals, 2011.HCUP. Statististics Brief =165. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville. Maryland.
Stanton C. K., Dubourg D., De Brouwere V., Pujades M., Ronmans C. (2005). Reliability of data for caesarean section in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 37(1), 41-48.
Ucklin B. A., Hawkins J. L., Anderson J. R., Ullrich F. A. (2005). Obstetrics, anesthesia workshop survey, twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 103(3) 645-53.
Ugwu Nu, de Kok B. (2015). Socio-cultural factors: gender and religious ideologies contributing to caesarean section refusal in Nigeria. Reprod. Health. 2015. 12:70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0050-7
Warjoloh A., Manongi R., Oneko, Hoyo C., Kjersti A. D., Wesreich D. (2012). Trenx in caesarean section rate at a large East African Referral Hospital from 2005-2010. Open Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, 2. 255-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2012.23053
Weiss M. (1997). For doctors eyes only: medical records in two Israeli hospitals. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 21: (3) 283-302.
Weiss M. (1997). For doctors eyes only: medical records in two Israeli hospitals. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 21: (3) 283-302.
WHO (2010). Trends in Maternal Mortality 1999 to 2008. Geneva World Health Organization.
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. WHO-HRP pp 1-10. Kaur J., Singh S.,
Zeidenstein L. (2005). Elective Cesarean Section: How Informed is Informed? Online Journal of Health Ethics. 2(1), pp. 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
