EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF LIFE-RELATED TO ORAL HEALTH AFTER DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC TREATMENTS IN EDENTULISM PATIENTS

Authors

  • Zeynep Basagaoglu Demirekin Phd DDS, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Isparta, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-8370
  • Elif Erten Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Isparta, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v10.i2.2022.4510

Keywords:

Complete Edentulism, Oral Health, Life Quality

Abstract [English]

Background: The impact of edentulism on oral health status is an important public health issue. Conventional complete dentures, implant-supported removable dentures and implant-supported fixed dentures are evidence-based treatment IRPtions in the treatment of complete edentulism. Quality of life may be compromised due to various reasons such as functional problems, diseases, nutritional deficiency, physiological and psychosocial problems in individuals using prostheses.
Objectives: Our aim in this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction of completely edentulous patients treated with conventional complete dentures, implant-supported removable dentures and implant-supported fixed dentures, oral health-related quality of life and to compare the effects on quality of life.
Methods: In this study, total of 140 patients involved, 49 female and 91 males, aged between 40 and 90 who were completely edentulous and treated at least 6 months ago in the Prosthetic Dentistry Clinic.
Patients were divided into 3 groups as conventional complete denture (CD), implant retained overdenture (IRP) and implant supported fixed prosthesis (ISFP). By Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), Oral Health-Related Quality of Life-United Kingdom (OHQoL-UK) questionnaires oral health-related quality of life was measured analyzed and obtained parameters were compared.
Results: When all findings were evaluated, the oral health-related quality of life of the group treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis were found to be higher than the conventional complete denture and implant-supported fixed prosthesis group. In addition, it was determined that implant-supported fixed and removable treatments had positive effects on patient satisfaction, quality of life compared to conventional complete denture treatment.
Conclusions: Support from dental implants while making a prosthetic treatment plan in edentulous patients will contribute positively to the stability and retention of the prosthesis. This will increase the quality of life of the person by supporting patient satisfaction, adaptation to the prosthesis and nutrition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, et al. (2003) Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures : à randomized clinical trial in a senior pIRPulation. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ;16(4). Retrieved from https://web.s.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=08932174&AN=36909223&h=ZhWZXtr5nS9g4H9RL7DzfmIb%2fm%2b%2bXdc9H4kIGV5FIxmYDb8ITEWy32aA%2fqzfYAkJucKddHDh1oY64IMJvBF6Mw%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d08932174%26AN%3d36909223

Bassetti RG, Enkling N, Mericske-Stern RD. (2016) Are there differences in the changes in oral- health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) depending on the type (rigidity) of prosthetic treatment ? Quintessence internationale. ;47(9) :749-57

Brennan DS, Spencer AJ, Roberts-Thomson KF. (2008) Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Quality of Life Research. ;17(2) :227-35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9293-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9293-2

Brennan M, Houston F, O'Sullivan M, O'Connell B. (2010) Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. ;25(4) :791-800. Retrieved from https://web.s.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=08822786&AN=52586286&h=JwBZ7RPV0w%2bGPpmBrESlz5NodZma3SiAXmJ%2fQ7m%2fst8LKQiSFkGUA0C4CS8lpcAMcZJSXBL5rQDKuquDGmrfPQ%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d08822786%26AN%3d52586286

Cakir O, Kazancioglu HO, Celik G, Deger S, Ak G. (2014) Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in à group of Turkish patients : à quality of life study. Journal of Prosthodontics. ;23(5) :390-6 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12120

Carlsson G, Omar R. (2010) The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation: A critical review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. ;37(2) :143-56. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x

Chetri S, Rathi A, Mehta P, Khadka R. (2020) Assessment of Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Completely Edentulous Patients after Prosthodontic Rehabilitation at Noble Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar. Birat Journal of Health Sciences. ;5(1) :886-90. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v5i1.29603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v5i1.29603

De Albuquerque RF, Lund JP, Tang L, Larivée J, De Grandmont P, Gauthier G, et al. (2000) Within‐ subject comparison of maxillary long‐bar implant‐retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage : patient‐based outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ;11(6) :555- 65. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006555.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006555.x

De Grandmont P, Feine J, Tache R, Boudrias P, Donohue W, Tanguay R, et al. (1994) Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses : psychometric evaluation. Journal of Dental Research. ;73(5) :1096-104. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730051201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730051201

Dogan BG, Gokalp S. (2012) Tooth loss and edentulism in the Turkish elderly. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. ;54(2) : e162-e6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.01.003

Elsyad MA. (2016) Patient satisfaction and prosthetic aspects with mini‐implants retained mandibular overdentures. A 5‐year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ;27(7) :926-33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12660

Emami E, de Souza RF, Bernier J, Rompré P, Feine JS. (2015) Patient perceptions of the mandibular three‐implant overdenture : à practice‐based study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ;26(6) :639-43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12351

Feine J, Carlsson G, Awad M, Chehade A, Duncan W, Gizani S, et al. (2002) The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. ;19(1) :3-4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x

Feine JS, Awad MA, Lund JP. (1998) The impact of patient preference on the design and interpretation of clinical trials. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology. ;26(1) :70-4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb02086.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb02086.x

Ferro KJ, Morgano SM, Driscoll CF, Freilich MA, Guckes AD, Knoernschild KL, et al. (2017) The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ;117(5S) : e12-e34.

Fontijn‐Tekamp F, Slagter AP, Van't Hof MA, Kalk W, Jansen JA. (2001) Pain and instability during biting with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ;12(1) :46-51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001046.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001046.x

Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. (2010) Tooth loss and oral health- related quality of life : à systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Quality of Life Outcomes. ;8(1) :1-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-126

Geçkili O, Bural C, Bilmenoğlu Ç. (2010) İmplant destekli tam protezlerde kullanılan tutucu sistemler. Ege Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. ;31(1) :9-18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5505/eudfd.2010.24865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/eudfd.2010.24865

Gift HC, Redford M. (1992) Oral health and the quality of life. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. ;8(3) :673-84. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30471-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30471-3

Hegarty A, McGrath C, Hodgson T, Porter S. (2002) Patient-centred outcome measures in oral medicine : are they valid and reliable ? International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. ;31(6) :670-4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0260

Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, De Albuquerque Jr RF, Lund JP, Feine JS. (2003) Within‐subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ;14(1) :125-30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x

Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. (2003) Oral and general health‐related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology. ;31(3) :161-8. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00029.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00029.x

Heydecke G, Tedesco LA, Kowalski C, Inglehart MR. (2004) Complete dentures and oral health‐ related quality of life-do cIRPing styles matter? Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology. ;32(4) :297-306. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00169.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00169.x

Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Feky A, Moynihan P. (2009) A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. Journal of Dentistry. ;37(9) :718-23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.028

Kroll P, Hou L, Radaideh H, Sharifi N, Han PP, Mulligan R, et al. (2018) Oral health-related outcomes in edentulous patients treated with mandibular implant-retained dentures versus complete dentures : systematic review with meta-analyses. Journal of Oral Implantology. ;44(4) :313-24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00210

Köse O, Alkurt M, Dilsiz A, Arabacı T. (2013) Dişsizliğin beslenme alışkanlıkları ve vücut ağırlığı üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi ;23(3) :399-407. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidfd/issue/2466/31487

Locker D, Allen F. (2007) What do measures of 'oral health‐related quality of life’measure ? Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology. ;35(6) :401-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x

Locker D, Matear D, Lawrence H. (2002) General health status and changes in chewing ability in older Canadians over seven years. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. ;62(2) :70-7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03425.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03425.x

Locker D. (1988) Measuring oral health : à conceptual framework. Community Dental Health Journal. ;5(1) :3-18.

McGrath C, Bedi R. (2001) An evaluation of a new measure of oral health related quality of life- OHQoL-UK (W). Community Dental Health. ;18 :138-43.

McGrath C, Bedi R. (2003) Measuring the impact of oral health on quality of life in Britain using OHQoL‐UK. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. ;63(2) :73-7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03478.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03478.x

Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, et al : (2006) Oral health related quality of life is affected by disease activity in Behcet's disease. Oral Dis ;12 :145-151. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01173.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01173.x

Nations. U. (2005) World pIRPulation to ıncrease by 2.6 Billion over next 45 years, with all growth occuring ın less develIRPed regions. [Available from : htCDs://www.un.org/press/en/2005/pIRP918.doc.htm.

Organization WH. (2007) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health : Children & Youth Version : ICF-CY : World Health Organization;.

Organization WH. (2017) Nursing and midwifery in the history of the World Health Organization 1948-2017.

Ozdemir AK, Ozdemir HD, Polat NT, Turgut M, Sezer H. (2006) The effect of personality type on denture satisfaction. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ;19(4) :364-70.

Preciado A, Del Río J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. (2013) A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers. Journal of Dentistry. ;41(9) :753-63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.06.014

Sadowsky SJ. (1997) The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch : design considerations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ;78(1) :28-33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. (1994) DevelIRPment and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community Dental Health. ;11(1) :3-11.

Slade GD : (1997) Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. J Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ;25 :284-290. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x

Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, et al. (2009) Mandibular two implant- supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. British Dental Journal ;207(4) :185-6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728

Tsakos G, Steele JG, Marcenes W, Walls AW, Sheiham A. (2006) Clinical correlates of oral health‐ related quality of life : evidence from a national sample of British older peIRPle. EurIRPean Journal of Oral Sciences. ;114(5) :391-5. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00398.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00398.x

Walton JN, MacEntee MI. (2005) Choosing or refusing oral implants : a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ;18(6).

Åstrøm A, Haugejorden O, Skaret E, Trovik T, Klock K. (2006) Oral impacts on daily performance in Norwegian adults : the influence of age, number of missing teeth, and socio‐demographic factors. EurIRPean Journal of Oral Sciences. ;114(2) :115-21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00336.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00336.x

Downloads

Published

2022-03-08

How to Cite

Demirekin, Z. B., & Erten, E. (2022). EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF LIFE-RELATED TO ORAL HEALTH AFTER DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC TREATMENTS IN EDENTULISM PATIENTS. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 10(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v10.i2.2022.4510