CONDUCTION DISORDERS AND PERMANENT CARDIAC PACEMAKER AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC IMPLANTATION - AN UPDATE OVERVIEW

Authors

  • Antônio da Silva Menezes Junior Department of Medicine, School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás and Federal University of Goiás, Brazil
  • Marcelo de Freitas Ribeiro Department of Medicine, School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás and Federal University of Goiás, Brazil
  • Tiago de Almeida Laranjeira Department of Medicine, School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás and Federal University of Goiás, Brazil
  • Vinícius Araújo Barbosa Department of Medicine, School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás and Federal University of Goiás, Brazil
  • Joaquim Ferreira Fernandes Scholar, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Goiás, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i8.2021.4110

Keywords:

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cardiac Pacing, Complications

Abstract

Aortic valve substitution is a standard technique with tolerable risk; nevertheless, the high mortality may be contraindicated. To reduce morbidity and mortality minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be an alternative approach. Although considered secure, after the method complications can occur, presenting as new-onset persistent left bundle branch block and demanding pacemaker implant. To establish how frequent this probability is, a systematic review from PUBMED (philters used were "15 years" and "free full texts") was achieved applying the terms "TAVI", "pacing" and "complications". For supporting literature, the other sources (SCIELO, Google Scholar and MEDLINE) were used

and consulted for supporting literature. Catheter aortic prosthesis implantation is an effective modality for patients with high surgical risk and severe aortic stenosis. The review results suggest that the need for a pacemaker after endovascular treatment is neither inevitable nor easily predicted by known risk factors. Even though TAVI is considered a safe technique of selection, the implant position is near to functionally significant septal cardiac structures. Conduction disorders are frequent and need prudent checking after the procedure. Forthcoming studies must be necessary to validate the proposed algorithm and define the role of EP studies, ambulatory continuous electrocardiogram (Holter 24 hours) monitoring and preventive pacemaker in the management of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akin I, Kische S, Paranskaya L, et al. 2012. Predictive Factors for Pacemaker Requirement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.;12:87. Published 2012 Oct 4. Doi :10.1186/1471-2261-12-87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-12-87

Ando T, Takagi H 2016; ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. The Prognostic Impact of New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol.;39(9):544-550. Doi :10.1002/clc.22567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22567

Bajrangee A, Coughlan JJ, Teehan S, et al. 2017. Early and Mid-term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in Ireland. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc.;16:1-3. Published 2017 Jul 7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2017.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2017.06.001

Barbanti M, Buccheri S, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. 2017. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with New-Generation Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Cardiol.;245:83-89. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.083

Ben-Shoshan J, Konigstein M, Zahler D, et al. 2017. Comparison of the Edwards SAPIEN S3 Versus Medtronic Evolut-R Devices for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol; 119:302–7. Retrived from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.030 ; PMID: 28029363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.030

Chen S, Chau KH, Nazif TM. 2020. The Incidence and Impact of Cardiac Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. Nov;9(6):452-467. Doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-av-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2020-av-23

Hamdan A, Guetta V, Klempfner R, et al. 2015. Inverse Relationship Between Membranous Septal Length and the Risk of Atrioventricular Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.;8(9):1218-1228. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.010

Junior ASM, de Oliveira PPC, Almeida LF, et al. 2018. Cardiac Pacing and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): A Literature Update Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy . 3(11):1-6.

Jørgensen T H, Thyregod H G, Ihlemann N, et al., 2021. Eight-year outcomes for patients with aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk randomized to transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement, European Heart Journal,; 43(30): 2912–2919, Retrived from https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab375

Kahlert P, Al-Rashid F, Plicht B, et al. 2016. Myocardial Injury During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Intracoronary Doppler and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. EuroIntervention.;11(12):1401-1408. Doi :10.4244/EIJY15M05_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M05_10

Kolkailah AA, Doukky R, Pelletier MP, Volgman AS, Kaneko T, Nabhan AF. 2019. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in People with Low Surgical Risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12(12):CD013319. Published Dec 20. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013319

Lemos PA, Mariani J, Esteves Filho A, et al. 2010. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Without Permanent Pacemaker in a Series of Consecutive Cases: Is it Possible to Predict the Risk of Atrioventricular Block? Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva;18(2):135–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972010000200006

Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. 2010. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients who Cannot Undergo Surgery. N Engl J Med.;363(17):1597-1607. Doi :10.1056/NEJMoa1008232.

Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, et al. 2019. PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. May 2;380(18):1695-1705. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1814052

Marina Urena M and Josep Rodés-Cabau M. 2015. Managing Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: From Monitoring to Device Selection and Pacemaker Indications. Euro Interv;11 Suppl W: W101–5. Doi :10.4244/EIJV11SWA30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11SWA30

Monteiro C, Ferrari ADL, Caramori PRA, et al. 2017. Permanent Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Predictors and Evolution of Left Ventricular Function. Arq Bras Cardiol.109(6):550-559. Doi :10.5935/abc.20170170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170170

Perin MA, Sândoli de Brito F, Oliveira Almeida B, Pereira MAM, et al. 2009. Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis: Early Experience in Brazil. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia;;93(3):299–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2009000900015

Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, et al. 2008 Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve. Cardiovascular Interventions;; Vol. 1, Circulation:74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.780858

Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, et al. 2019 . Evolut Low Risk Trial Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. May 2;380(18):1706-1715. Doi :10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816885

Rodés-Cabau J, Ellenbogen KA, Krahn AD, et al. 2019. Management of Conduction Disturbances Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol.;74(8):1086-1106. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014

Ruel M, Labinaz M. 2010. Transcatheter Aortic-valve Replacement: a Cardiac Surgeon and Cardiologist Team Perspective. Curr Opin Cardiol.;25(2):107-113. Doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328335fff4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0b013e328335fff4

Sarmento-Leite R, De Quadros AS, Prates PRL, et al. 2009. Marca-passo Permanente após Implante Percutâneo Valvular Aórtico: A Necessidade é Maior Que Imaginávamos? Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva;17(4):476–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972009000400010

Serruys PW, Piazza N, Cribier A, et al. 2009. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, Tips and Tricks to Avoid Failure. 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; p. 113-114.

Thyregod HG, Steinbrüchel DA, Ihlemann N, et al. 2015 . Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 26;65(20):2184-94. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.014

Tovia-Brodie O, Michowitz Y, Belhassen B. 2020. Use of Electrophysiological Studies in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. Jun 3;9(1):20-27. Doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.38.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.38.3

Tsoi M, Tandon K, Zimetbaum PJ, Frishman WH. 2021. Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Predictors and Prevention [published online ahead of print, Jun 14]. Cardiol Rev. 2021;10.1097/CRD.0000000000000398. Doi :10.1097/CRD.0000000000000398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000398

Webb J, Gerosa G, Lefevre T, et al. 2014. Multicenter Evaluation of a Next-Generation Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve. Am J Coll Cardiol; 64:2235–43. Doi: org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.026

Yokoyama H, Tobaru T, Muto Y, et al. 2019 Long-term Outcomes in Japanese Nonagenarians Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Multi-center Analysis. Clin Cardiol. 42(6):605-611. Doi: 10.1002/clc.23183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23183

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Menezes Junior, A. da S., Ribeiro, M. de F., Laranjeira, T. de A., Barbosa, V. A., & Fernandes, J. F. . (2021). CONDUCTION DISORDERS AND PERMANENT CARDIAC PACEMAKER AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC IMPLANTATION - AN UPDATE OVERVIEW. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(8), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i8.2021.4110