MARRIAGE AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT ASSETS IN MIXED COUPLE MARRIAGE ACCORDING IN INDONESIA BOOK OF CIVIL LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1974 POST DECISION OF THE COURT OF CONSTITUTION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015

© 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 290 MARRIAGE AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT ASSETS IN MIXED COUPLE MARRIAGE ACCORDING IN INDONESIA BOOK OF CIVIL LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1974 POST DECISION OF THE COURT OF CONSTITUTION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015

Regarding mixed marriages, Indonesian citizens (WNI) who marry foreign citizens, after marriage, are indeed not allowed to have land rights in the form of Ownership Rights, Business Use Rights or Building Use Rights.
Article 35 of the Marriage Law of 1974 states that assets obtained during a marriage become joint property. So, there is a mixture of assets obtained after marriage, and the spouse (who is a foreign citizen) will also become the owner of the joint property. While referring to the provisions of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (PDPA Law 1960), foreigners must not have Ownership Rights, Business Permit or Building Use Rights.
Article 21 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (PDPA Law 1960) expressly states, that only Indonesian citizens can use property rights. And foreigners who after the entry into force of the 1960 PDPA Law who obtained property rights due to inheritance without a will or a mixture of assets due to marriage, likewise Indonesian citizens who lose their citizenship are required to release their citizenship within one year of the acquisition of that right or loss of citizenship. Furthermore Article 36 Paragraph (1) of the 1960 PDPA Law states that "those who can have the right to build are: (a). Indonesian citizens; and (b). a legal entity established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia. " Based on these provisions, that a citizen who is married to a foreigner, after marriage can no longer obtain the Right of Ownership, or Right to Build, or Cultivation rights, because it will be part of the joint assets that he has with his foreign national partners. On the basic of these provisions, if an Indonesian citizen wishes to retain land rights after marriage with a foreign national, the Indonesian citizen must make a marriage agreement or prenuptial agreement governing the separation of assets.
Provisions regarding marriage agreements for property obtained during the marriage underwent quite revolutionary changes after the Constitutional Court Decision (hereinafter referred to as MK) Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 invalidated several provisions in the Marriage Law 1974 and Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Regulations Basic Principles of Agraria (read, PDPA Act 1960) and declared contradictory to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia). 6 According to the Court, that a marriage agreement may be made at the time, before, or during marriage.
Letter of the General Director of Population and Civil Registration of the Ministry of Home Affairs Number 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL dated May 19, 2017, a marriage agreement can be made before, during and during the marriage with a notary deed and reported to the Implementing Agency or the Citizenship Implementation Unit ("UPT")) Implementing Agency. Regarding the reporting of the marriage agreement, the Civil Registration Officer at the Implementing Agency or the UPT of the Implementing Agency makes a marginal note on the register of the deed and the marriage certificate.
Consideration of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 dated October 26, 2016, stipulates that Article 29 paragraph (1) of the 1974 Marriage Law is interpreted "At the time, prior to being carried out or during the marriage contract both parties upon mutual agreement may submit a written agreement. which is validated by the marriage registrar or notary public, after which the contents also apply to third parties as long as the third party is involved". Thus, regardless of the marital procedure / administration, Indonesian citizens who engage in mixed marriages (married to foreigners) in order to obtain legal protection especially for assets obtained during marriages due to the provisions of the PDPA law 1960 Act can make marriage agreements at the time, before held or during the marriage bond of both parties. If this is not the case, then the disadvantaged are the Indonesian citizens themselves, whereas in accordance with the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, that every citizen is equal in law and government, including the ownership of property in the form of Property  Based on the background of these problems, the legal issue in this study is whether Indonesian citizens who are married to foreigners are not entitled to joint property in the form of Ownership Rights, Business Permit or Building Use Rights. From these legal issues the following problems can be formulated, First, how is the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during mixed marriages according to the Civil Code? Second, what is the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during mixed marriages according to Law Number 1 of  1974 concerning Marriage? Third, what is the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during  mixed marriages after Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015? The research objectives are, First, to examine the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during mixed marriages according to the Civil Code. Second, review the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during mixed marriages according to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Third, analyze the position of the marriage agreement for property obtained during a mixed marriage after the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015.
In accordance with the study focus of the problem, the theory used in this study includes the theory of citizenship in mixed marriages, and marriage agreement theories related to material rights. According to the Theory of Citizenship in Mixed Marriage, that the citizenship of husband/wife follows two theories, namely the theory of legal unity and the theory of equality. The theory of legal unity requires that the citizenship of the wife follow the status of the husband both when the marriage takes place and then after the marriage runs. Meanwhile, according to the theory of equality, that marriage does not affect a person's citizenship at all, in the sense that each of them (wife or husband) is free to determine their attitude in determining their citizenship or that the husband and wife continue to be citizens of origin even though they are husband and wife.
Meanwhile, according to the Marriage Agreement Theory is related to material rights, that the marriage agreement brings legal consequences to the separation of shared assets in the marriage. In other words, the purpose of making a marriage agreement is to make a deviation from the provisions regarding joint assets The benefits of this research are contributing thoughts for the development of law, especially civil law both from the perspective of general civil law (BW) and Islamic civil law, especially family law concerning the position of marriage agreements on property obtained during marriage (theoretical aspects). It is also expected to be a reference for the preparation of further research, and at the same time be used as a reference for religious justice in decision making, especially concerning the distribution of assets obtained during marriage during divorce in order to provide legal protection to private rights (practical aspects).
In accordance with their background and purpose, research on a Marriage Agreement for Joint Assets in Mixed Marriage According to Law Number 1 of 1974 Post Constitutional Court Ruling Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 is a normative (dogmatic) legal research, 7 which intended to find and formulate legal arguments, 8 through analysis of the main problem. While the approach used in this study there are 4 (four) types, namely: the statute approach; comparative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.
The research steps undertaken are collecting legal materials, both primary and secondary legal materials related to the research topic. All secondary legal materials are recorded using a card system. The cards are arranged based on the main research problems and systematic writing that has been formulated.
All research results obtained from the legal materials mentioned above are searched for relationships between one another using deductive and inductive reasoning to produce propositions and concepts in the form of definitions, descriptions and classifications as a result of research.

MIXED MARRIAGE ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Mixed marriages in Indonesia are regulated in three applicable legal provisions, namely the Civil Code for non-Muslims, and for Muslims regulated by the Marriage and Islamic Law which are adapted in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI).
Before the promulgation of the 1974 Marriage Law, mixed marriages were regulated by the Koninklijk Besluit dated 29 December 1896 No. 23. 9 This regulation is called Regeling op de Gemengde Huwelijk which is better known as Gemengde Huwelijk Regeling, with the abbreviation G.H.R which is commonly referred to as Mixed Marriage Rules. 10 The meaning of mixed marriages in accordance with Article 1 of the GHR is a marriage between "people" who are "in" Indonesia subject to different laws. This definition is very broad in scope, does not limit the meaning of mixed marriages in marriages between Indonesian citizens or between Indonesian marriages and marriages that take place in Indonesia, provided that the parties that hold marriages in Indonesia are subject to different laws which are mixed marriages. 8 Argumentation (argument) has two meanings: (1) "argument" means a series of reasoning (trains of reasoning); (2) "argument" refers to human interaction relating to the argumentation forum (eg court, scientific meeting, congress, etc.). Next on page h. 9. Three theories of legal argumentation are presented, namely: (1) logical argumentation theory based on the formal logic approach; (2) rhetorical argument theory, with a focus on the effectiveness of argumentation with language in combination; (3) dialogical argumentation theory, patterning legal argumentation as part of a discussion. In this dialogical approach combined with logic and rhetoric models. Ibid. 9 Staatblad 1898 No. 158 10 R. Soetojo Prawirohamidjojo, Pluralism in Marriage Legislation in Indonesia, Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, p. 89 11 In this context it also includes marriages between two non-Indonesian citizens who hold marriages outside of Indonesia. For example, between Arab citizens with French citizens, including mixed marriages. But this meaning is too broad, because when marriage takes place there is absolutely no connection with Indonesian law, unless they later become Indonesian citizens.
In the definition of the provisions of Article 1 of the GHR, including marriage between two people who are Indonesian citizens who are in Indonesia subject to two different legal rules that carry out marriages outside Indonesia or also between an Indonesian citizen and a foreign citizen are also included mixed marriages. Except when parties or parties who were previously subject to all or part of the BW marriage law, then their marriage applies the provisions of Article 83 of the Civil Code.
Based on the provisions of Article 1 of the GHR and Article 83 of the Civil Code, those included in the definition of mixed marriages include: 1) between two Indonesian citizens, one belonging to the European group and the other to the Eastern Chinese group; 2) between two Indonesian citizens, one belonging to the Eastern Chinese foreign group and the other to the non-Chinese Eastern Eastern class; 3) between two Indonesian citizens including one European or Eastern Chinese foreigner and a foreign national.
In addition, according to the provisions of Article 1 of the GHR, marriages between two people in Indonesia that belong to the same group, but are subject to different laws also include mixed marriages. for example, Bumiputera What is meant by mixed marriages in this Law is for marriages between two people who are subject to different laws in Indonesia, due to differences in citizenship and one of the parties is a foreign national and one of the parties is an Indonesian citizen.
Article 57 restricts the marriage of mixed marriages to marriages between an Indonesian citizen and a person who is not an Indonesian citizen, so that they include marriages between fellow citizens of different laws and between Indonesian non-citizens.
With the effectuation of Law Number 1 of 1974, the provisions stipulated in the GHR referred to as already stipulated in the Marriage Law are declared invalid. Because Article 57 of the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 emphasizes differences in citizenship and or subject to different laws, the provisions of the GHR still apply as long as the person performing the mixed marriage is a person as regulated in Article 57 of the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974. 12 Purnadi Purbacaraka and Agus Brotosusilo provide the definition of international marriage as follows: International marriage is a marriage that contains elements of using. The using element can be in the form of a bride having different citizenship with the other bride, or both brides having the same citizenship but the marriage takes place in another country or a combination of both. 13 The difference in the law has caused several kinds of mixed marriages, namely: 1) Intergentiel Marriage explains which law or what law applies, if a marriage arises between 2 (two) people, each with the same or different nationality, who are subject to different legal regulations. For example, Indonesian citizens from Europe are married to native Indonesians. 2) Interlocal Mixed Marriage arranges legal relations (marriages) between native Indonesians from each customary environment. For example, Minang people marry Javanese.

3) Interreligious Mixed Marriage (interreligious) Regulates the legal relationship (marriage) between 2 (two)
people, each of whom is subject to different religious law regulations. For example, Muslims with Christians. 14 In the 1974 Marriage Law it has been determined that the legality of marriage in Indonesia is based on each religion and belief. 15 Therefore regarding mixed marriages that are held in Indonesia must be done based on 12  Indonesian marriage law so the marriages of marriage must be based on religious law and must be noted if both parties, the prospective husband and wife adhere to the same religion will not cause problems, but if different religions, then there will be legal problems between religions. The problem will not be complicated if one party to merge/follow the religion of the other party by the willingness, but this difficulty arises if both parties still want to maintain their beliefs. Moreover, because the Civil Registry Office (now the Office of Population and Civil Registry) based on Presidential Decree Number 12 of 1983, no longer functions to marry off.
But in reality, it often happens for the couple to easily marry based on the religion of one party, and then after their marriage is ratified, they return to their respective beliefs. In Indonesia interfaith marriage is still a problem that still needs to be resolved as well as possible for its citizens.
Regarding the legitimacy of mixed marriages, there are no specific arrangements, so that in practice the citizenship often occurs and to facilitate the couple marry based on the religion of one party, but then after the marriage is ratified, they return to their respective beliefs. Besides that, there are also couples who have marriages abroad, only then registered in Indonesia.
Based on this, because the issue of mixed marriages is not possible to be eliminated, then for the existence of legal certainty as citizens, an arrangement is made regarding the validity of mixed marriages.

MARRIAGE AGREEMENT FOR COMMON ASSETS IN MIXED MARRIAGE
Mixed marriages actually carry quite complicated legal consequences, which are related to the position of the husband/wife, the position of children, and the position of property.
Article 2 of the GHR stipulates that a woman (wife) who engages in mixed marriage, as long as the marriage has not broken, is subject to the laws applicable to her husband, both public and private law. The point is that the wife follows the husband's legal status. From this provision it is clear that for the wife there is no other choice, other than submitting itself to the husband's law. In addition, this provision also does not provide freedom for the wife to determine which legal choices apply to her after she has made a mixed marriage. Having the husband's public legal position by his wife does not mean that the wife based on the provisions of Article 2 of the GHR obtains the citizenship of the sumi.
Whether the wife gains citizenship and/or loses her own citizenship, depends on the citizenship law of the husband and wife's country. According to the Indonesian Citizenship Law and the Citizenship Act in many other countries, the wife does not automatically obtain the husband's citizenship and lose his own citizenship. The wife may not lose her own citizenship and not obtain the husband's citizenship. Because the rights and obligations of the public (the right to choose and be elected, the right to obtain education, conscription, compulsory tax on foreigners, etc.) are generally related to citizenship, whereas citizenship is determined by the citizenship law. Then the GHR for a wife's public legal position can be said to have no meaning.
Article 11 of the GHR stipulates that children born of mixed marriages that have been carried out before the entry into force of the GHR, obtain the position of public and private law of their fathers. Whereas according to Article 12 of the GHR, the position of children referred to in Article 11 of the GHR as legitimate children of fathers and mothers cannot be disputed, because in the marriage certificate there are defects or because there is no marriage certificate, if the children are treated as legitimate children and the mother's father live openly as husband and wife.
Marriage Law 1974 Article 62 states, that in a mixed marriage the position of children is regulated in accordance with Article 59 paragraph (1), which states, "Citizenship obtained as a result of marriage or marriage terminates determines the applicable law, both regarding public law and civil law." Regarding the citizenship status of children born from mixed marriages regulated in Article 4 letters b to f the Citizenship Act which is basically determined, that every child born second and/or one of his parents (father and/or mother) is an Indonesian citizen then he classified as an Indonesian citizen. Exceptions for children whose parents are of foreign nationality which results in the child having dual nationality, after they are 18 (eighteen) years of age or married, they must declare their choice of citizenship. 16 Based on this provisions, basically the citizenship status of a child born from mixed marriages in which one of his parents is an Indonesian citizen is recognized as an Indonesian citizen until the person is 18 (eighteen) years old or has married so they have the right to choose their nationality. 17 Even the loss of Indonesian citizenship to one of the parents of a child born from mixed marriages does not automatically apply to nationality until their citizenship is 18 (eighteen) years of age or married, unless the consequence of making the child dual citizenship -so they must state choose one of his citizenship. 18 In the context of applicable law in Indonesia, the regulation of assets obtained during marriage is regulated in different legal provisions (plurality), namely Civil Law, especially for non-Muslim citizens and for Muslims citizens the provisions of the Marriage Law 1974, Instruction President Number 1 of 1991 concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law (hereinafter referred to as KHI) in addition to applying Islamic Law itself.
According to the provisions of the Civil Code, that basically the assets obtained during marriage become one, become joint property. In Article 119 of the Civil Code. Regarding property in marriage the 1974 Marriage Law, is regulated in Article 35 which states as follows: 1) Property obtained during marriage becomes joint property.
2) The inheritance of each husband and wife and the property obtained by each as a gift or inheritance are under each supervision as long as the parties do not specify otherwise. Based on the provisions of Article 35 of the 1974 Marriage Law, that assets obtained by inheritance or gifts cannot be categorized as joint assets. This provision is in line with the word of God in Sura al-Nisa verse 32 which basically confirms that every man and woman has a part of what they are trying for themselves.

ANALYSIS OF MARRIAGE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE POST-MIXED CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF MARRIAGE NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015 LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015
On October 27, 2016, the Constitutional Court (MK) had issued Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 which in its citizenship granted the request for judicial review of the provisions regarding the Marriage Agreement regulated in Article 29 paragraph (1), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) Marriage Law 1974. The Constitutional Court's ruling has created a new legal norm related to the Marriage Agreement as follows 1) At the time, before it takes place or during marriage, both parties with mutual agreement can submit a written agreement that is ratified by the marriage registrar or notary, after which the contents also apply to third parties as long as the third party is involved.
2) The agreement cannot be ratified if it violates the limits of law, religion and decency.
3) The agreement is valid since the marriage is carried out, unless specified otherwise in the Marriage Agreement.
During the marriage, the marriage agreement can be regarding marriage assets or other agreements, can't be changed or revoked, except if from both parties there is an agreement to change or revoke, and the change or revocation does not harm a third party.
The Materially, the Constitutional Court's decision above is a responsive legal ruling if this is related to Sellnic Nonet's legal theory which states that good law in modern society is law that responds to the wishes of its citizens. In this case, related to the petition which the constitutional rights of Indonesian citizens who have mixed marriages without a marriage agreement lose their constitutional rights to have a Right of Ownership (HGB) for land because there is no marriage agreement meaningful according to Article 35 paragraph (1) The 1974 Marriage Act took place joint property. Therefore, if an Indonesian citizen who conducts a mixed marriage without a marriage agreement when purchasing ownership rights/HGB rights on the land will also be owned by the foreign national of the husband or wife of the Indonesian citizen, even though the ownership rights/HGB on the land cannot be given to the foreigners according to Article 21 paragraph (3) and 26 paragraphs (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law 1960. This will clearly harm the mixed-married Indonesian citizen because even though as Indonesian citizens it is evidently prevented from ever having the Right of Ownership/HGB on the land.
With the decision of the Constitutional Court that permits a marriage agreement during the marriage bond which is in fact also a marriage agreement can take effect after the marriage takes place and can even be made changes or revocation as long as both parties (husband and wife) agree and not harm a third party. Of course, this legal ruling is a new legal instrument that gives a breath of fresh air to Indonesian citizens who engage in mixed marriages while still maintaining their citizens will be able and have the opportunity to have ownership rights/HGB on land, this is no longer in conflict or in accordance with their Constitutional Rights as regulated in Article 28 H paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015
The Constitutional Court verdicts, will obtain permanent and binding legal force since after being pronounced before an open public hearing, 19 which means that, the Constitutional Court's decision immediately obtains permanent and binding legal force after being pronounced and no other legal remedies can be taken (final and binding). The legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision above which granted the Petitioner's petition were null and did not have binding legal force over a legal norm requested by the Petitioner, therefore in this case Article 29 paragraph (1), (3), and (4) Law The Marriage Law of 1974 is based on the Constitutional Court ruling above a conditional unconstitutional, so that such a ruling creates a new legal condition/norm (declarative constitutive) which in this case the MK as referred to by Hans Kelsen as a negative-legislator, so that the Constitutional Court Ruling is the same as the order constitution.
The legal force of the Constitutional Court's Decision consists of binding legal force, legal force of proof, and executive legal force. The legal force binding on the Constitutional Court's Decision is not only binding on litigants (interpartes), but also binding and/or intended for all citizens, state institutions/officials and legal entities within the territory of the Republic of Indonesia (erga omnes). Therefore, based on the explanation, the Constitutional Court's Decision also binds the Notary as the authority (official) in the drafting of the marriage agreement and the Office of Population and Civil Registration or the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) as the official who has the authority to register the marriage agreement certificate.
The phenomenon that occurs in the community which is one of the considerations of the Constitutional Court to declare such articles as conditional unconstitutional as the Constitutional Court's legal considerations described above, this is only done by the Constitutional Court to provide legal certainty and justice guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution for the public for their constitutional rights in making an agreement (the principle of freedom of contract) in this case a marriage agreement, therefore the Constitutional Court through one of its authorities regulated in Article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution is to examine the Law against The 1945 Constitution issued a progressive ruling to accommodate the legal needs of the community.
However, related to the recording of marriage agreements made throughout the marriage, it must also be noted that in practice there are still technical obstacles in recording the marriage agreement, this is because there are evidently civil registry officials who only hold technical instructions related to marriage registration, by ignoring the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations regarding the registration of marriage and the recording of the marriage agreement. This obstacle occurs because in the Form (Form F2.12) used to register the marriage there is no column regarding the marriage agreement. 20 19  The drafting of a marriage agreement generally results in legal consequences for the status of the property as well as for any third party concerned. Regarding the status of the assets, that the marriage agreement results in the separation of assets which were previously shared assets into the property of each party and other assets which later arise after the date of the stipulation remain separated from one another, so that there is no status anymore shared property.
The validity of the marriage agreement has consequences for third parties, as stipulated in Article 152 of the Civil Code which reads: "The provisions contained in the marriage agreement, which contain deviations from unity according to the Law in whole or in part, will not pass to the party third, before the day the provisions are made in a general register, which must be held for that matter at the Registrar's Office of the District Court, which in the jurisdiction of the marriage has taken place, or, if the marriage takes place abroad, in the Registrar's Office where the marriage certificate is recorded ". From the above provisions it can be seen that a marriage agreement can also apply to third parties, after the marriage agreement is registered at the Registrar's Office of the District Court.
So, based on the provisions of Article 147 Juncto Article 152 of the Civil law it can be concluded that since the marriage took place the marriage agreement only applies to the parties who made it, namely husband and wife, whereas the marriage agreement only applies to third parties since it is registered at the Registrar's District Court.

CONCLUSION
Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court the marriage agreement comes into force since the marriage took place, unless otherwise specified in the marriage agreement. This means that if the parties do not specify when the marriage agreement will come into effect, then by law the marriage agreement will take effect from the time the marriage is concluded. Thus, the legal consequences of the status of joint property made a marriage agreement after marriage which began since the marriage took place followed by the status of shared property becomes separate if desired by both parties in the agreement, as well as the assets to be obtained in the future remain the property of each -each party, without having to obtain a court decision related to the separation of assets. Then the legal consequences of making a marriage agreement based on the Constitutional Court's Decision apply and bind a third party. The making of such a marriage agreement must not be detrimental to a third party, because the making of a marriage agreement as long as the marriage takes place brings legal consequences to changes in the legal status of property contained or obtained in the marriage.

SOURCES OF FUNDING
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.