CEPHALOMETRIC NORMS FOR GUJARATI CHILDREN - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • Dr. Purva B Butala Reader, Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Department, Ahmedabad Dental College & Hospital, India
  • Dr. Purv S Patel Reader, Oral Medicine and Radiology Department, Ahmedabad Dental College and Hospital, India
  • Dr. M Ganesh Professor & Head, Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Department, Ahmedabad Dental College and Hospital, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i4.2020.42

Keywords:

Mcnamara’s Analysis, Gujarati Children, Cephalometric Norms

Abstract [English]

Introduction: Orthodontists have relied on cephalometric radiographs for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning since the advent of cephalometric radiography. The variations in different ethnic groups within the same country creates a need for cephalometric norms for each of such ethnic groups. McNamara’s analysis is the most commonly used and most suitable for diagnosis and treatment planning.


Aim: The study aims to formulate cephalometric norms for Gujarati boys and girls using McNamara’s analysis.


Materials & Method: The sample of children for the study was selected from the government funded primary schools of Gujarat. The sample size consisted of 250 school going Gujarati children (125 boys and 125 girls) with age ranging from 9 to 12 years.


Materials & Method: A digital lateral cephalograph was taken under standard conditions for all children and manual tracings were done for identifying all cephalometric landmarks. The analysis was done using McNamara’s analysis and statistical analysis was done


Statistical Analysis: Gender differences were calculated using student’s t test. The software was utilized to calculate the mean value, standard deviation, range, maximum and minimum values for all parameters of McNamara’s analysis for Gujarati boys as well as girls. The inter examiner variability was tested using Karl Pearson correlation test.


Results: The mean and standard deviation with minimum values, maximum values and range for each of 11 parameters were calculated for all male and female subjects. The gender differences were also calculated for all subjects.


Conclusion: This study introduces cephalometric norms for the mixed dentition period using McNamara Analysis for Gujarati children residing in Ahmedabad – Gandhinagar districts of Gujarat which can be utilized for orthodontic treatment in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avesh S, Adit S, Chaturvedi T. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in a north Indian ethnic population. J Orthod Sci 2012;1(4):92-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.105877

Tripti T, Rohit K, Kiran S, Rana M, Geeta V, Mayank A. Arnett’s soft tissue cephalometric analysis norms for the North Indian population: A cephalometric study. J Ind Orthod Soc 2014;48(4):224-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820140402

Isha A, Anil S. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis applied to Himachali ethnic population. Indian J Dent Sci 2016;8:124-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-4003.191731

Manan A, Sonali D, Jayesh R, Vijay S, Charudatt N, Milind D. Mean values of Steiner, Tweed, Ricketts and McNamara analysis in Maratha ethnic population: A cephalometric study. APOS Trend Orthod 2013;3(5):137-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-1407.119095

Hung Huey Tsai. A study of growth changes in the mandible from deciduous to permanent dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;27(2):137-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.27.2.p77tn25l5w157661

Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Floating norms for the assessment of craniofacial pattern in the deciduous dentition. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:359-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/18.1.359

Magnani M, Nouer D, Kuramae M, Lucato A, Boeck M, Vedovello S. Evaluation of facial pattern in Black Brazilian subjects. Braz J Oral Sci 2007;6(23):1428-31.

Kuramae M, Magnani M, Boeck E, Lucato A. Jarabak’s cephalometric analysis of Brazilian black patients. Braz Dent J 2007;18(3):258-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000300016

Nivedita S, Rajat M, Pritam M, Tushar N, Smruti N, Anand G. Cephalometric norms for east Indian population using Burstone Legan analysis. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(12):1076-81.

Thilander B, Persson M, Adolfsson U. Roentgeno-cephalometric standards for a Swedish population: A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:370-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji033

Carrillo LE, Kubodera IT, Gonzalez LB, Bastida MN, Pereyra EG. Cephalometric norms according to the Harvold’s analysis. Int J Odontostomat 2009;3(1):33-9.

Yadav A, Singh C, Borle R, Chaoji K, Rajan R, Datarkar A. Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(1):27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.79970

Lalitha C, Anupriya J, Vasumurthy S, Sri Harsha Y. Evaluation of composite cephalometric norms in South Indian subjects. Orthod J Nepal 2015;5(2):25-7.

Eldaissy AM. Cephalometric norms of Libyan children in mixed dentition phase. Cairo Dent J 2008;24(3):531-5.

Wu J, Hagg U, Rabie BM. Chinese Norms of McNamara’s Cephalometric Analysis. Angle Orthod 2007;77(1):12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/021606-62R.1

Sahar F, Nabeel F. Cephalometric norms for Saudi sample using McNamara analysis. Saudi Dent J 2007;19(3):139-45.

Hamdan AM, Rock WP. Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population. J Orthod 2001;28:297-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/28.4.297

Nanda R, Nanda R. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. Angle Orthod 1969;39(1):22-8.

Satinder S, Ashok U, Ashok J. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for North Indian population. Contemporary Clin Dent 2013;4(4):460-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123041

Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69.

Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1960;46:721-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90145-7

Ricketts RM. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961;31:141-56.

Bjork A. The face in profile. Svensk Tandlakare Tidskrift; 40, No. 5B, 1947.

Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1948;34:812-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3

Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Angle Orthod 1971;41:161-88.

McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984;86:449-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X

Obloj B, Fudalej P, Dudkiewicz Z. Cephalometric Standards for Polish 10 Year Olds with Normal Occlusion. Angle Orthod 2008;78(2):262-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/011207-14.1

Bhat M, Sudha P, Tandon S. Cephalometric norms for Bunt and Brahmin children of Dakshina Kannada based on McNamara’s analysis. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2001;19(2):41-51.

Silva C, Pinhao AF. Frankfort plane vs. natural head posture in cephalometric diagnosis. Dent Med Probl 2003;40(1):129-134.

Hassan AH. Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a research report. Head Face Med 2005;1(5):6-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-1-5

Arunkumar KV, Vardhan V, Tauro DP. Establishment of cephalometric norms for the South Indian population based on Burstone’s analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;9(2):127-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0039-2

Wu J, Hagg U, Wong R, McGrath C. Comprehensive cephalometric analyses of 10 to 14 year old Southern Chinese. Open Anthropol J 2010;3:85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874912701003020085

Dreven M, Farcnik F, Vidmar G. Cephalometric standards for Slovenians in the mixed dentition period. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:51-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji081

Kotak VB. Cephalometric evaluation of Indian girls with neutral occlusion. J Indian Dent Assoc 1964;36:183.

Johannsdottir B, Thordarson A, Magnusson T. Craniofacial morphology in 6 year old Icelandic children. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:283-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.3.283

Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(6):876-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.043

Abu HM, Alshamsi AH, Hafez S, Eldin EM. Cephalometric norms for a sample of Emirates adults. Open J Stomatol 2011;1:75-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2011.13013

Dean J, Avery D, McDonald R. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 9th ed. Mosby: Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2011.

Agarwal N, Bagga D, Sharma P. A comparative study of cephalometric measurements with digital versus manual methods. J Ind Orthod Soc 2011;45(2):84-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1014

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles & Interpretation. 6th ed. Noida: Reed Elsevier India Private Limited; 2009.

Nahidh M. Iraqi cephalometric norms using McNamara’s analysis. J Bagh Col Dent 2010;22(3):123-7.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Patel, P. S., Patel, P. S., & Ganesh , M. (2020). CEPHALOMETRIC NORMS FOR GUJARATI CHILDREN - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i4.2020.42