INDOOR COMFORT CONDITIONS IN TERMS OF USER SATISFACTION FOR MIDDLE-INCOME GROUPS: THE CASE OF ATAEVLER, BURSA, TURKEY

Authors

  • Miray Gür Uludag University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Turkey
  • Filiz Şenkal Sezer Uludag University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1398

Keywords:

User Comfort, Indoor Comfort Conditions, Bursa, User Satisfaction, Middle-Income Housing, Daylight

Abstract [English]

The objective of this research paper is to investigate residents’ perception of indoor comfort conditions and user satisfaction in the residences for middle-income groups, focusing on thermal, visual and acoustical comfort. For this purpose, a residential satisfaction survey was conducted to residents of 5 housing estates in Ataevler, Bursa, Turkey. The study consists of literature review, evaluation of user satisfaction survey, and discussion of the research findings focusing on improving indoor environment. The questionnaires were applied to residents and they were asked to express their perception of indoor comfort and their satisfaction level with comfort parameters in which they live in. The answers have statically been analyzed in terms of percentages through SPSS 13.0. The results obtained indicate that the main dissatisfaction factors related to comfort conditions of middle income groups in their housing estates were related to indoor-outdoor noise problems and inadequate daylight received. The results suggest that comfort levels of users related to climatic factors vary based on their house and seasons. Heating levels of buildings are adjusted based on the comfort of the users. Comfort levels related to indoor-outdoor noise are very low. Satisfaction levels from visual comfort is low in buildings that were constructed close to each other because of inadequate daylight. Achieving optimal visual, acoustical, and climatic comfort conditions is essential to create a positive impact on users’ performance in houses. The results of this study and suggested comfort conditions are expected to contribute to building policies, building producers, academia and to the implementation of high quality, healthy and energy efficient houses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

WHO, Air quality guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Publications, European Series, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, 2000.

Braubanch, M. Key challenges of housing and health from WHO perspective, International Journal of Public Health, 2011, 56: 579–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0296-y

Krieger, J., Higgins, D. L. Housing and Health: Time Again for Public Health Action, American Journal of Public Health, 2002, Vol 92, No.5: 758-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.5.758

Huang, L., Zhu, Y., Ouyang, Q., Cao, B. A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices, Building and Environment Vol. 49, 2012: 304-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.022

Ormandy, O., Ezratty, V. Health and thermal comfort: From WHO gouidance to housing strategies. Energy Policy Vol. 49, 2012: 116–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.003

Hasselaar, E. Health performance of housing: Indicators and tools, 2006, IOS Press under the imprint Delft University Press

de Silva, S. M., de Almeida, M. G. Thermal and acoustic comfort in buildings, Internoise 15-16 June 2010, Portugal.

Türkoğlu, H. D. Residents’ satisfaction of housing environments: the case of Istanbul, Turkey, Landscape and Urban Planning Vol. 39, 1997: 55-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00040-6

Jiboye, A.D. The correlates of public housing satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria, Journal of Geography and Regional Planning Vol. 3(2), 2010: 017-028.

Ibem, E. O., Aduwo, E. B. Assessment of residential satisfaction in public housing in Ogun State, Nigeria, Habitat International Vol. 40, 2013: 163-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.04.001

Pekkonen , M., Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U. Housing satisfaction in Finland with regard to area, dwelling type and tenure status, Central European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 23 (4), 2015: 314–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a4080

Frontczak, M., Andersen, R.V., Wargocki, P. Questionnaire survey on factors influencing comfort with indoor environmental quality in Danish housing, Building and Environment, Vol. 50, 2012, 56-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.012

Wong, N. H., Feriadi, H., Lim, P. Y., Tham, K. W., Sekhar, C., Cheong, K. W. Thermal comfort evaluation of naturally ventilated public housing in Singapore, Building and Environment Vol. 37, 2002: 1267 – 1277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00103-2

Soebarto, V., Bennetts, H. Thermal comfort and occupant responses during summer in a low to middle income housing development in South Australia. Building and Environment, Vol. 75, 2014, 19-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.013

Feriadi, H., Wong, N. H. Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 36, 2004: 614–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.011

Xue, P., Mak, C. M., Cheung, H.D. The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey, Building and Environment, Vol. 81, 2014, 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.011

Ng, E. Studies on daylight design and regulation of high density residential housing in Hong Kong, Lighting Research& Technology, Vol. 35, 2, 2003: 127–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1477153503li087oa

WHO (World Health Organization), Housing, energy and thermal comfort: A review of 10 countries within the WHO European Region, 2007

SPSS 13.0 for Windows Program

https://www.google.com.tr/intl/tr/earth/

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, USA. (Online) Available:

http://arco-hvac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ASHRAE-55-2010.pdf (June 22, 2018).

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Gür, M., & Sezer, F. Şenkal. (2018). INDOOR COMFORT CONDITIONS IN TERMS OF USER SATISFACTION FOR MIDDLE-INCOME GROUPS: THE CASE OF ATAEVLER, BURSA, TURKEY. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 6(6), 522–535. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1398