REAL POWER LOSS MINIMIZATION BY MUTUAL MAMMAL BEHAVIOR ALGORITHM

Authors

  • Dr.K.Lenin Researcher, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 500 085, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i5.2017.1840

Keywords:

Reactive Power, Transmission Loss, Mutual Mammal Behavior, Optimization

Abstract [English]

This paper presents a Mutual Mammal Behavior (MM) algorithm for solving Reactive power problem in power system. Modal analysis of the system is used for static voltage stability assessment. Loss minimization is taken is taken as main objective. Generator terminal voltages, reactive power generation of the capacitor banks and tap changing transformer setting are taken as the optimization variables. A Meta heuristic algorithm for global optimization called the Mutual Mammal Behavior (MM) is introduced. Mammal groups like Carnivores, African lion, Cheetah, Dingo Fennec Fox, Moose, Polar Bear, Sea Otter, Blue Whale, Bottlenose Dolphin exhibit a variety of behaviors including swarming about a food source, milling around a central location, or migrating over large distances in aligned groups. These Mutual behaviors are often advantageous to groups, allowing them to increase their harvesting efficiency, to follow better migration routes, to improve their aerodynamic, and to avoid predation. In the proposed algorithm, the searcher agents emulate a group of Mammals which interact with each other based on the biological laws of Mutual motion. MM powerful stochastic optimization technique has been utilized to solve the reactive power optimization problem. In order to evaluate up the performance of the proposed algorithm, it has been tested on Standard IEEE 57,118 bus systems. Proposed MM algorithm out performs other reported standard algorithm’s in reducing real power loss.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O. Alsac and B. Scott, “Optimal load flow with steady state security,” IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-93, no. 3, pp. 745-751, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1974.293972

K. Y. Lee, Y. M. Paru, and J. L. Oritz, “A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-104, no. 5, pp. 1147-1153, 1985.

A. Monticelli, M. V. F. Pereira, and S. Granville, “Security constrained optimal power flow with post contingency corrective rescheduling,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. PWRS-2, no. 1, pp. 175-182, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335095

N. Deeb and S. M. Shahidehpur, “Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 428-435, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/59.54549

E. Hobson, “Network constrained reactive power control using linear programming,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. PAS-99, no. 4, pp. 868-877, 1980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1980.319715

K. Y. Lee, Y. M. Park, and J. L. Oritz, “Fuel-Cost optimization for both real and reactive power dispatches,” IEE Proceedings C, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 85-93, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-c.1984.0012

M. K. Mangoli and K. Y. Lee, “Optimal real and reactive power control using linear programming,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 26, pp. 1-10, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7796(93)90063-K

J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, pp. 1942-1948.

D. Dasgupta, Artificial Immune Systems and Their Application, Heidelberg: Springer, 1998.

M. Dorigo and T. Stützle, Ant Colony Optimization, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1290.001.0001

A. Baykasoglu, L. Ozbakir, and P. Tapkan, “Artificial bee colony algorithm and its application to generalized assignment problem,” in Swarm Intelligence: Focus on Ant and Particle Swarm Optimization, F. T. S. Chan and M. K. Tiwari, Ed. I-Tech Education and Publishing, 2007, pp. 113-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/5101

R. Oftadeh, M. J. Mahjoob, and M. Shariatpanahi, “A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm inspired by group hunting of animals: hunting search,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 2087–2098, 2010.

D. J. T. Sumpter, “The principles of collective animal behaviour,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 361, no. 1465, pp. 5–22, 2006.

O. Petit and R. Bon, “Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 635–647, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.009

A. Kolpas, J. Moehlis, T. A. Frewen, and I. G. Kevrekidis, “Coarse analysis of collective motion with different communication mechanisms,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 214, no. 1-2, pp. 49–57, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2008.06.003

D. Couzin, “Collective cognition in animal groups,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002

D. Couzin and J. Krause, “Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates,” Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 32, pp. 1–75, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01001-5

N. W. F. Bode, D. W. Franks, and A. Jamie Wood, “Making noise: emergent stochasticity in collective motion,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 292–299, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.08.034

D. Couzin, J. Krause, R. James, G. D. Ruxton, and N. R. Franks, “Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065

Couzin, “Collective minds,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7129, p. 715, 2007.

S. Bazazi, J. Buhl, J. J. Hale et al., “Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 735–739, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.035

N. W. F. Bode, A. J. Wood, and D. W. Franks, “The impact of social networks on animal collective motion,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.04.011

B. H. Lemasson, J. J. Anderson, and R. A. Goodwin, “Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: the adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 261, no. 4, pp. 501–510, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.013

M. Bourjade, B. Thierry, M. Maumy, and O. Petit, “Decision-making processes in the collective movements of Przewalski horses families Equus ferus Przewalskii: influences of the environment,” Ethology, vol. 115, pp. 321–330, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01614.x

A. Bang, S. Deshpande, A. Sumana, and R. Gadagkar, “Choosing an appropriate index to construct dominance hierarchies in animal societies: a comparison of three indices,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 631–636, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.009

Y. Hsu, R. L. Earley, and L. L. Wolf, “Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes,” Biological Reviews, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 33–74, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S146479310500686X

M. Broom, A. Koenig, and C. Borries, “Variation in dominance hierarchies among group-living animals: modeling stability and the likelihood of coalitions,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 844–855, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp069

K. L. Bayly, C. S. Evans, and A. Taylor, “Measuring social structure: a comparison of eight dominance indices,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.011

L. Conradt and T. J. Roper, “Consensus decision making in animals,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 449–456, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008

A. Okubo, “Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds,” Advances in Biophysics, vol. 22, pp. 1–94, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0065-227X(86)90003-1

C.W. Reynolds, “Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behaviouralmodel,” Computer Graphics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25–34, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/37402.37406

S. Gueron, S. A. Levin, and D. I. Rubenstein, “The dynamics of herds: from individuals to aggregations,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0144

A. Czir´ok and T. Vicsek, “Collective behavior of interacting self-propelled particles,” Physica A, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00013-3

Chaohua Dai, Weirong Chen, Yunfang Zhu, and Xuexia Zhang, “Seeker optimization algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, August 2009, pp. 1218-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021226

J. R. Gomes and 0. R. Saavedra, “Optimal reactive power dispatch using evolutionary computation: Extended algorithms,” IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib.. Vol. 146, No. 6. Nov. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:19990683

IEEE, “The IEEE 30-bus test system and the IEEE 118-test system”, (1993), http://www.ee.washington.edu/trsearch/pstca/.

Jiangtao Cao, Fuli Wang and Ping Li, “An Improved Biogeography-based Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Flow”, International Journal of Control and Automation Vol.7, No.3 (2014), pp.161-176.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-31

How to Cite

Lenin, K. (2017). REAL POWER LOSS MINIMIZATION BY MUTUAL MAMMAL BEHAVIOR ALGORITHM. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(5), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i5.2017.1840

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>