THE REGIONAL DIVIDE IN SMART CITIES IMPLEMENTATION A SOUTH-EAST COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Amit Jaiswal

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v12.i12.2024.6528

Authors

Dr. Amit Jaiswal Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Government Girls' PG College, Bindki, Fatehpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v12.i12.2024.6528

Keywords:

Smart Cities Mission, Regional Disparities, Implementation Analysis, South India, East India, Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity, Federal Urban Policy

Abstract [English]

India's Smart Cities Mission, launched in 2015, represents an ambitious attempt to modernize urban infrastructure across 100 cities. However, implementation has been highly uneven across regions. This paper examines the stark regional disparities between South and East India, analyzing 49 cities covering 3,564 projects worth Rs. 73,876 crore as of July 2023. South India demonstrates a completion rate of 78.8% compared to East India's 53.3%, representing a statistically significant gap of 25.5 percentage points (p<0.001). Through comparative analysis, this study identifies five key determinants of success: institutional capacity of state governments and urban local bodies, political stability and continuity, historical infrastructure investment patterns, project design and scale optimization, and fiscal autonomy and resource mobilization capabilities. The findings reveal that Karnataka (89.2% completion) and Tamil Nadu (84.3%) lead South India through strong state-level coordination, while Northeast states in East India face severe capacity constraints with completion rates as low as 11.8% (Shillong). This research contributes to understanding federal urban policy implementation in India and provides evidence-based policy recommendations for bridging regional disparities. The study has significant implications for the design of future national urban development programs and highlights the critical role of state capacity in determining implementation outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart Cities: A Conjuncture of Four Forces. Cities, 47, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004

Chatterjee, S. (2020). Institutional Fragmentation and Smart Cities Implementation in India. Urban Governance Review, 12(3), 45–67.

Chhibber, P., & Nooruddin, I. (2004). Do Party Systems Count? The Number of Parties and Government Performance in the Indian States. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 152–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003260981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003260981

Comptroller and Auditor General of India. (2022). Performance Audit on Smart Cities Mission (Report No. 18 of 2022). Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

Datta, A. (2015). New Urban Utopias of Postcolonial India: “Entrepreneurial Urbanization” in Dholera Smart City, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748

Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is Governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035

Hoelscher, K. (2016). The Evolution of the Smart Cities Agenda in India. International Area Studies Review, 19(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865916632089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865916632089

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126

Joshi, R., Agarwal, A., Kumar, P., & Bali, S. (2017). Smart Cities: Opportunities for Controlled Urbanisation of India? Journal of Urban Management, 6(1–2), 64–71.

Kundu, A. (2014). India’s Sluggish Urbanisation and Its Exclusionary Development. In A. Sorensen & J. Okata (Eds.), Megacities: Urban form, governance, and sustainability (121–146). Springer.

Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M. C. (2014). Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2015). Smart Cities Mission Statement & Guidelines. Government of India.

Mishra, D. K. (2014). Special Category States in India: The Case of the Northeast. In D. K. Mishra (Ed.), Internal Security of India: Issues and Challenges (89–112). Concept Publishing.

Mohanty, P. K. (2016). Financing Cities in India: Municipal Reforms, Fiscal Accountability and Urban Infrastructure. SAGE Publications.

Praharaj, S., Han, J. H., & Hawken, S. (2018). Towards the Right Model of Smart City Governance in India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-171-186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-171-186

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.

Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation. Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614

Rao, M. G., & Sen, K. (2003). Regional Disparities in India: A Fresh Assessment. In A. Shah & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), State and Local Finances in India (89–128). Oxford University Press.

Sachs, J. D., Bajpai, N., & Ramiah, A. (2002). Understanding Regional Economic Growth in India. Asian Economic Papers, 1(3), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/153535102320893983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/153535102320893983

Shaw, A. (2012). Indian Cities in Transition. Orient Blackswan.

Singh, P. (2018). How Solidarity Works for Welfare: Subnationalism and Social Development in India. Cambridge University Press.