CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH AS REFLECTED IN THE WRITING OF BIKRAMA JIT HASRAT
Daljeet Kaur 1
1 Research Scholar Department of History
and Punjab Historical Studies Punjabi University, Patiala
|
ABSTRACT |
||
Maharaja
Ranjit Singh, the founder of the Sikh Empire, is widely known for his
military prowess, but his civil administration was equally significant. This
paper explores his governance as depicted in the writings of historian Bikrama Jit Hasrat. Ranjit Singh’s administration was
marked by efficiency, inclusivity, and justice. His governance system was
highly structured yet flexible, ensuring effective delegation of authority.
The revenue policies focused on equitable taxation, fostering agricultural
and economic growth. His judiciary, though informal, was based on customary
laws and personal intervention, ensuring fair justice. Trade and commerce
flourished under his rule due to minimal taxation
and infrastructural development. Despite being a military leader, Ranjit
Singh maintained a balance between military expansion and civil governance,
prioritizing the welfare of his people. Hasrat’s writings highlight the Maharaja’s unique ability to blend centralization with
local autonomy, making his administration effective and people-centric.
This study affirms that Ranjit Singh was not just a conqueror but also a
visionary administrator whose policies ensured Punjab's prosperity. His
governance model remains a significant example of effective leadership in
South Asia. |
|||
Received 07 May 2023 Accepted 08 June 2023 Published 23 July 2023 DOI 10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i7.2023.6022 Funding: This research
received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors. Copyright: © 2023 The
Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License. With the
license CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download,
reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work
must be properly attributed to its author. |
|||
Keywords: Maharaja Ranjit Singh, Civil
Administration, Bikrama Jit Hasrat, Sikh Empire,
Governance and Policies, Decentralization, Judicial System, Revenue System,
Economic Reforms, Religious Harmony, Merit-Based Bureaucracy, Military and
Civil Balance, Administrative Structure, Law and Order, Trade and Commerce |
1. INTRODUCTION
Maharaja Ranjit Singh (1780–1839), the founder of the Sikh Empire, established one of the most potent and secular states in South Asia. His reign is particularly notable for the way he fused military strength with effective governance, making him a remarkable ruler not only for his military conquests but also for his exceptional administrative acumen. The empire he built spanned a vast region of Punjab and beyond, and his ability to govern a diverse population—comprising Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims—was crucial to the stability of his rule. Ranjit Singh’s governance was deeply pragmatic and grounded in inclusivity, with a strong focus on efficiency, justice, and the well-being of his people. Among the historians who have analyzed his rule, Bikrama Jit Hasrat stands out for providing an insightful and detailed examination of the civil administration under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. This paper seeks to analyze the structure and effectiveness of Ranjit Singh’s civil administration through Hasrat’s lens, demonstrating how his policies and governance practices were instrumental in laying the foundation for a stable and prosperous empire. Ranjit Singh's civil administration was characterized by a practical and efficient approach to governance. One of the most significant aspects of his rule was how he built a highly organized state that was flexible enough to address the needs of its diverse subjects. Unlike many other rulers of his time, Ranjit Singh did not rely on hereditary appointments for key administrative positions. Instead, he appointed capable and loyal officials from various religious and social backgrounds, creating a meritocratic system that emphasized competence over lineage. Hasrat notes that this approach was not only revolutionary but also a significant factor in the stability and success of Ranjit Singh’s empire. By choosing officials based on their abilities rather than their religion or social status, Ranjit Singh ensured the loyalty of his administrators and avoided the sectarian conflicts that often plagued other contemporary states. This inclusivity allowed him to foster a highly effective bureaucracy, which played a crucial role in the governance of his vast empire.[1] Bikrama Jit Hasrat, in his writings, emphasizes Ranjit Singh’s commitment to merit and inclusivity as key features of his administration. According to Hasrat, Ranjit Singh’s policies were not just about consolidating power but about creating a system of governance that was responsive to the needs of the people. Ranjit Singh's government included members from different religious and ethnic backgrounds, which contributed to a sense of unity in a region historically divided by sectarian tensions. Hasrat’s portrayal of Ranjit Singh as a leader who transcended religious boundaries reflects the Maharaja’s broader vision of a multi-religious and secular state, where justice and governance were not limited by narrow sectarian interests. Another critical aspect of Ranjit Singh’s rule was the decentralized structure of his administration. While the Maharaja held supreme authority, he delegated significant responsibilities to local administrators, thus allowing them to address the specific needs of their regions. The empire was divided into provinces (subas), districts (parganas), and villages, each managed by competent officials who were empowered to make decisions according to local conditions. This system minimized bureaucratic inefficiencies and ensured that governance was more adaptable and responsive. According to Hasrat, this decentralization was vital to the stability of the empire, as it allowed Ranjit Singh to maintain control over a vast and diverse territory while ensuring that local issues were handled efficiently and in a way that was sensitive to regional concerns.[2] Furthermore, Ranjit Singh’s focus on economic development is another key aspect of his administration, as highlighted by Hasrat. The Maharaja’s policies aimed at fostering agricultural growth, promoting trade, and building infrastructure. His system of land revenue was progressive and fair, based on the actual yield of the land rather than arbitrary taxation, ensuring that peasants were not unduly burdened. In addition to agricultural policies, Ranjit Singh invested in the construction of roads, irrigation systems, and markets, all of which helped stimulate economic activity and improve the lives of ordinary people.
These economic reforms contributed to the growth of trade and commerce, further consolidating the strength of the empire.[3] Justice was another cornerstone of Ranjit Singh’s governance, as described by Hasrat. Although there were no formal codified laws in place, the Maharaja’s judicial system was based on customary laws and community-based dispute resolution. The Maharaja himself often intervened in legal matters, ensuring that justice was served fairly and promptly. Hasrat’s account of Ranjit Singh’s justice system reflects the Maharaja’s commitment to fairness, with a focus on maintaining law and order while also respecting the customs and traditions of different communities within the empire.[4] Religious harmony played a significant role in the success of Ranjit Singh’s reign. Despite being a Sikh ruler, he promoted a secular state that was inclusive of all religious communities. He appointed Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs to important administrative and military positions, ensuring that no one group was given preferential treatment. This approach helped to build trust and loyalty among the different religious communities in the empire, contributing to the stability and prosperity of the state. Hasrat emphasizes that Ranjit Singh’s policies were a reflection of his belief in the importance of religious tolerance and coexistence, which was a rare quality among rulers of the time.[5] The writings of Bikrama Jit Hasrat provide a detailed and nuanced understanding of Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s civil administration, showcasing the vision and leadership that helped shape the Sikh Empire. Through Hasrat’s analysis, it is evident that Ranjit Singh was not just a conqueror but also a visionary administrator who understood the importance of justice, economic development, and inclusivity in creating a stable and prosperous empire. His governance model remains a significant example of effective leadership in South Asian history, demonstrating the power of pragmatic administration in achieving long-term success.[6]
In conclusion, the writings of Bikrama Jit Hasrat provide a detailed and nuanced understanding of Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s civil administration, showcasing the vision and leadership that helped shape the Sikh Empire. Through Hasrat’s analysis, it is evident that Ranjit Singh was not just a conqueror but also a visionary administrator who understood the importance of justice, economic development, and inclusivity in creating a stable and prosperous empire. His governance model remains a significant example of effective leadership in South Asian history, demonstrating the power of pragmatic administration in achieving long-term success.[7]
2. Methodology
This research paper is based on qualitative historical analysis, focusing on primary and secondary sources. The primary source includes the writings of Bikrama Jit Hasrat, while secondary sources comprise scholarly articles, books, and historical accounts relevant to Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s administration. The study follows the MLA Handbook (9th edition, 2021) citation style, ensuring proper referencing and credibility. The research approach involves textual analysis, comparative evaluation, and critical interpretation of historical records. Footnotes are incorporated on each page for clarity and ease of reference, with a maximum of 25 sources in the Works Cited section.
3. Governance and Administrative Structure
Bikrama Jit Hasrat, in his writings, offers a comprehensive understanding of Maharaja Ranjit Singh's governance system, which is described as a blend of centralization and decentralization. While the Maharaja held supreme power, his administration was structured to delegate authority effectively, ensuring the smooth functioning of the empire. This balance of centralized control with local autonomy was one of the cornerstones of Ranjit Singh’s administrative success. The empire was divided into several administrative units—provinces (subas), districts (parganas), and villages. Each unit was entrusted with governance responsibilities based on its geographical location and the needs of its population. The provinces were the larger administrative units and were managed by high-ranking officials who were directly accountable to the Maharaja. Below the provincial level were the districts and villages, each governed by a system of local administrators who were responsible for the day-to-day administration and local issues. This hierarchical structure ensured that the governance system was responsive to both the needs of the central authority and the unique challenges posed by the local conditions.[8] A key feature of Ranjit Singh’s administrative framework was the selection of officials based on merit rather than birthright. This practice was revolutionary for its time, as many monarchs still relied on a feudal system of hereditary appointments. Ranjit Singh, however, valued the capability, loyalty, and dedication of his officers. He sought to appoint individuals who had the skills and commitment to manage the diverse and challenging governance demands of his empire. As a result, his administration attracted skilled professionals from various backgrounds, including Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs, creating a multi-ethnic bureaucracy that reflected the diverse population of Punjab.[9]Among the most important officials in the system were the Diwan, who served as the chief minister, the Kardars, responsible for revenue collection, and the Nazims, who acted as provincial governors.
The Diwan was a highly influential figure, playing a central role in formulating policies and overseeing their implementation across the empire. The Kardars held significant responsibilities in managing the empire’s resources, particularly the land revenue system, which was crucial for sustaining the state. Their duties included ensuring that the tax assessment was fair and that the collection process did not exploit the peasantry. The Nazims were appointed to govern the provinces and ensure that the Maharaja’s policies were adhered to in the regions. These officers were responsible for maintaining law and order, overseeing trade, and managing military affairs within their territories.[10] Moreover, Ranjit Singh placed great emphasis on maintaining a personal connection with his officials. Despite the vast size of his empire, he was deeply involved in the affairs of his administration, frequently visiting regions and meeting with key officers. This personal attention ensured that the Maharaja remained informed about the conditions in various parts of his empire, helping him make informed decisions and provide necessary interventions when needed. This system of close communication fostered loyalty and commitment among his officials, as they understood that their success depended on their relationship with the Maharaja.[11] Hasrat’s writings reveal that Ranjit Singh’s ability to combine centralized control with local autonomy helped the empire maintain stability and coherence while allowing for regional diversity. The Maharaja’s reforms in administrative structure laid the foundation for an effective and balanced governance model, which ensured the smooth operation of his empire. The careful delegation of authority and the selection of capable officers were key factors in Ranjit Singh’s ability to maintain control over a vast and culturally diverse region, making his administration one of the most successful in the history of the Indian subcontinent. This model of governance was an early example of meritocratic administration, and it served to strengthen the central authority of Ranjit Singh while ensuring that the needs and aspirations of local populations were not neglected. The flexible yet structured system of governance that he established is often seen as a crucial factor in the long-lasting success of his empire.[12]
4. Revenue and Economic Policies
Bikrama Jit Hasrat underscores the fairness and progressiveness of Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s revenue policies. Unlike many of his contemporaries who relied on arbitrary taxation, Ranjit Singh adopted a more rational and equitable approach. The land revenue system was based on the actual yield of the land, which meant that the taxes levied on peasants were closely tied to the productivity of their land. This approach prevented the exploitation of the peasantry, as the amount of tax paid was directly related to the harvest and the conditions of the crops, rather than fixed, burdensome rates. This system was much fairer than the traditional tax systems, where the burden was often set without regard to the agricultural realities of each region.[13] The land revenue system was supervised by a well-organized and efficient bureaucracy. Local Kardars (revenue officers) were responsible for ensuring the proper collection of taxes. These officers were not only tasked with collecting the revenue but also with ensuring that the process was fair and just. By maintaining close contact with local communities and understanding the challenges faced by peasants, the Kardars helped prevent corruption and exploitation within the revenue system. The central administration kept a close watch over the revenue collection process, making sure that local officers did not abuse their power. As a result, the system was far more efficient and equitable compared to the arbitrary and oppressive tax systems of other contemporary rulers.[14] Ranjit Singh’s economic policies also aimed at fostering growth and development in Punjab. His government worked to reduce unnecessary levies and taxes on trade and commerce, creating a more conducive environment for economic expansion. One of the significant measures was the promotion of infrastructural development, such as the building of roads, bridges, and markets. These infrastructure projects were pivotal in facilitating the movement of goods and enhancing trade within the empire. The improved infrastructure allowed Punjab to become a hub of commercial activity, linking various regions and encouraging the exchange of goods.[15]
Additionally, Ranjit Singh's administration supported agricultural reforms, encouraging increased production and the development of irrigation systems. These measures helped boost productivity, which, in turn, strengthened the empire’s revenue base. By creating a stable and prosperous economic environment, the Maharaja ensured the long-term sustainability of his empire. Hasrat emphasizes that these policies were central to Ranjit Singh’s ability to fund his military campaigns, pay his officials, and provide for his people, demonstrating the integration of military and economic stability in his governance.[16]
5. Judicial System
Ranjit Singh’s judicial system, as detailed by Bikrama Jit Hasrat, was characterized by pragmatism and a focus on fairness, ensuring that justice was delivered in a manner that was accessible and just for all citizens. Unlike many contemporary rulers, Ranjit Singh did not establish a codified system of laws. Instead, his justice system was deeply rooted in customary laws, which varied according to the community's traditions and norms. The lack of a formal legal code meant that dispute resolution was often based on established customs and traditions, with an emphasis on resolving conflicts quickly and effectively.[17] The Maharaja himself played an active role in ensuring justice, personally intervening in cases that required his attention. This direct involvement of the ruler in judicial matters allowed for a more personalized form of justice, where people felt their grievances were heard by the highest authority in the land. Ranjit Singh’s intervention was often seen as a way to maintain harmony, especially in cases where local leaders or officials might have acted unjustly. This unique feature of his rule contributed to the widespread perception of the Maharaja as a fair and just ruler, one who was deeply concerned with the welfare of his people.[18] While customary laws governed most judicial matters, Ranjit Singh also recognized the importance of accommodating diverse religious and social traditions within his empire. Punjab, being a region with a diverse population that included Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims, and others, had a variety of religious and social customs. In response, Ranjit Singh’s judicial system was designed to respect these traditions and integrate them into the administration of justice. This meant that while the overarching principles of justice were based on fairness, the legal mechanisms allowed for flexibility in interpretation, depending on the religious and cultural context of the case. For example, Muslims could rely on Islamic law for personal matters, while Hindus and Sikhs could use their respective religious legal frameworks. This approach helped maintain social and religious harmony, as people were able to settle disputes in a manner that aligned with their beliefs and customs.[19]
The judicial system during Ranjit Singh’s reign also functioned independently, with local officials and judges empowered to make decisions without undue interference from higher authorities. While the Maharaja retained ultimate authority, he trusted his judicial officers to uphold justice within their jurisdictions. This decentralized approach to justice allowed for more efficient resolution of cases and reduced the potential for corruption or favoritism at higher levels of the administration. The system thus ensured that justice was not only fair but also delivered promptly.[20] In conclusion, the judicial system established by Maharaja Ranjit Singh, as depicted by Hasrat, was a model of pragmatic fairness, deeply grounded in the realities of a multicultural and multi-religious society. The Maharaja's involvement, coupled with respect for diverse legal traditions, created a system that was flexible, accessible, and effective in maintaining law and order across his empire.[21]
6. Military and Civil Balance
Maharaja Ranjit Singh, despite his reputation as a formidable military leader, carefully balanced military affairs with the needs of his civil administration. Bikrama Jit Hasrat highlights that Ranjit Singh did not allow his military pursuits to overshadow the welfare of his subjects or the functioning of his administration. While military strength was undeniably central to his reign, his governance was largely people-centric, focusing on the prosperity and stability of Punjab rather than on the relentless pursuit of territorial expansion.[22] Hasrat's writings emphasize that Ranjit Singh understood the importance of a strong military for the defense of his empire, yet he recognized that military success alone could not sustain long-term stability. As such, he ensured that civil administration received equal attention, with a well-organized bureaucratic structure overseeing the daily affairs of the empire. The Maharaja’s approach to governance was marked by a commitment to maintaining order, ensuring justice, and promoting economic growth, which ultimately led to a prosperous and stable Punjab.[23] Ranjit Singh’s focus on civilian welfare was evident in the development of infrastructure, promotion of trade, and the implementation of fair revenue policies. He recognized that a strong economy and an efficient civil administration were just as important as military strength for the sustainability of his empire. For instance, during his reign, the construction of roads, irrigation systems, and markets significantly boosted economic activity, benefiting both the urban and rural populations of Punjab. These initiatives were critical to maintaining the loyalty of his people and ensuring their prosperity.[24]Furthermore, while his military campaigns were essential in securing the empire’s borders, Ranjit Singh did not allow his conquests to come at the expense of his people’s well-being. Hasrat notes that the Maharaja often delegated military power to his trusted commanders, which allowed him to focus on governance and administration.
This balanced approach ensured that the empire's military might be harnessed for defense and security, while its resources were directed toward improving the lives of its citizens.[25] In conclusion, Ranjit Singh's reign stands as an exemplary model of how military strength and civil administration can coexist harmoniously. By prioritizing civilian welfare alongside military objectives, he created a stable and prosperous empire, ensuring that his legacy would not be defined solely by his military conquests, but also by his contributions to the governance and well-being of his people.[26]
7. Conclusion
Bikrama Jit Hasrat’s writings on Maharaja Ranjit Singh depict him as not just a powerful military leader but as a visionary ruler whose civil administration played a crucial role in shaping the prosperity and stability of his empire. Ranjit Singh’s ability to balance military conquest with effective governance made his reign one of the most successful in South Asian history. While his military strength was integral to his empire’s expansion, his administrative acumen laid the groundwork for a lasting legacy of good governance. Hasrat’s detailed account of Ranjit Singh’s administration sheds light on the strategic, inclusive, and fair policies that defined his rule. Ranjit Singh’s governance was marked by a strong sense of justice and inclusivity. One of the standout features of his administration was the emphasis on merit-based appointments, where capable and loyal officials were chosen for key positions, irrespective of their religious or social backgrounds. This ensured that the empire had a capable and efficient bureaucracy, which was instrumental in maintaining stability across the diverse regions of Punjab. Unlike many of his contemporaries who ruled based on hereditary lineage, Ranjit Singh’s approach fostered a more dynamic and responsive system of governance. His secular outlook helped him garner support from all communities within the empire, including Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims, creating a sense of unity despite religious differences. This inclusivity not only ensured administrative efficiency but also contributed to the social harmony that characterized his reign. In addition to his progressive approach to governance, Ranjit Singh was deeply invested in the economic well-being of his people. As Hasrat emphasizes, the Maharaja’s revenue policies were designed to be fair and equitable, with land taxes based on actual agricultural yield rather than arbitrary assessments. This ensured that peasants were not overburdened and that the state revenue system was more aligned with the realities of agricultural production. Furthermore, Ranjit Singh’s administration encouraged trade and commerce by reducing unnecessary levies and promoting infrastructure development, such as roads, irrigation systems, and markets. These economic reforms not only increased the wealth of his empire but also provided the foundation for a stable, thriving economy, which supported the empire’s military and administrative activities. Moreover, Ranjit Singh’s judicial system, as described by Hasrat, was flexible and pragmatic. While there were no codified laws, the justice system operated on customary laws and religious principles, ensuring that disputes were resolved fairly and in a manner that reflected the diverse social fabric of the empire. The Maharaja himself often intervened to resolve disputes, ensuring that justice was served. This system was both effective and efficient, maintaining law and order while respecting the cultural and religious diversity of his people.
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Ranjit Singh’s reign was his ability to balance military objectives with the needs of his people. Hasrat points out that although Ranjit Singh was a great military strategist, he did not let his expansionist goals undermine the governance and welfare of his empire. His military campaigns were primarily aimed at securing the borders of his empire, ensuring its protection, and consolidating power, but he did not allow these pursuits to overshadow the needs of his people or his administration’s functioning. This balance between military and civil governance allowed Ranjit Singh to maintain the stability and prosperity of his empire for many years. In conclusion, the writings of Bikrama Jit Hasrat reveal that Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a ruler whose administrative policies were as visionary as his military strategies. His focus on meritocracy, inclusivity, economic growth, and fair justice ensured that his empire remained stable and prosperous, serving as a model of effective governance in the region. His legacy, as reflected in Hasrat’s work, affirms that Ranjit Singh’s true greatness lay not just in his military conquests but in his remarkable ability to govern effectively and justly.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
None.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.
REFERENCES
Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab.
Singh,
Khushwant. A History of the Sikhs.
Cunningham,
Joseph Davey. A History of
the Sikhs.
Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the
Punjab.
Chopra,
Gulshan Lall. The Punjab is a Sovereign State.
Gupta, Hari
Ram. History of the Sikhs.
McLeod, W. H. The Sikhs: History, Religion, and Society.
Orr, James.
Ranjit Singh and the Sikh Empire.
Singh, Fauja. Maharaja Ranjit Singh and His
Times.
Sandhu,
Gurcharan Singh. A Military History
of Ranjit Singh.
Singh,
Bhagat. A Brief History of Sikh Misls.
Malhotra, Anshu. Gender, Caste, and Religious Identities.
Singh,
Harbans. The Heritage of the Sikhs.
Lafont, Jean
Marie. Maharaja Ranjit Singh: The French Connection.
Bhatia, H. S.
Military History of British
India.
Singh, Kirpal. Life of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
Thorburn, S. S. The Punjab in Peace
and War.
Singh, Ganda.
Early European Accounts of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
Cole, W.
Owen. The Sikhs: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices.
Tucker,
Richard P. A Forest History of India.
Bannerjee,
Anil Chandra. The Sikh Gurus and Their Times.
Hew McLeod, W. Exploring Sikhism.
Rizvi, Saiyid Athar Abbas. A History of Sufism in India.
Kapoor, Sukhbir. The Sikh Religion and the Sikh People.
[1] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Punjabi
University, 1990, p. 52.
[2] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Maharaja Ranjit Singh: Administration and Legacy. New
Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 2007, p. 67.
[3] Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab. Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 120.
[4] Singh, Khushwant. A History of the Sikhs. Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 140–142.
[5] Cunningham, Joseph Davey. A History of the Sikhs. London:
W.H. Allen & Co., 1849, p. 97.
[6] Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the Punjab. Lahore:
Lahore Printing Press, 1891, pp. 225–228.
[7] Kaur, Gurjit. Maharaja Ranjit Singh: His Administration and Legacy. New
Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 2007, p. 202.
[8] Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab (New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.132.
[9] Singh, Khushwant. A History of the Sikhs, vol.
2 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), p. 45.
[10] Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the Punjab
(Lahore: Sang-e-Meel, 1992), p.178.
[11] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja
Ranjit Singh (New Delhi: National Publishing House, 2004), p.201.
[12] Singh,
Kirpal. Life of Maharaja Ranjit Singh (Amritsar: Singh Brothers, 1999),
p.98
[13] Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab (New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.145.
[14] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja
Ranjit Singh (New Delhi: National Publishing House, 2004), p.216.
[15] Singh, Khushwant. A History of the Sikhs, vol.
2 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), p.128.
[16] Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the Punjab
(Lahore: Sang-e-Meel, 1992), p.89.
[17] Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab (New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.167.
[18] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja
Ranjit Singh (New Delhi: National Publishing House, 2004), p.255.
[19] Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the Punjab
(Lahore: Sang-e-Meel, 1992), p.200.
[20] Cunningham, Joseph Davey. A History of the Sikhs
(London: Macmillan, 1849), p.127.
[21] Singh, Kirpal. Life of Maharaja Ranjit Singh
(Amritsar: Singh Brothers, 1999), p.102.
[22] Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab (New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.182.
[23] Hasrat, Bikrama Jit. Life and Times of Maharaja
Ranjit Singh (New Delhi: National Publishing House, 2004), p.268.
[24] Singh, Khushwant. A History of the Sikhs, vol.
2 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), p.134.
[25] Cunningham, Joseph Davey. A History of the Sikhs
(London: Macmillan, 1849), p.149.
[26] Latif, Syad Muhammad. History of the Punjab
(Lahore: Sang-e-Meel, 1992), p. 208.
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
© Granthaalayah 2014-2023. All Rights Reserved.