VARIANTS OF RANGANATHAN’S FIVE LAWS: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY

The Five Laws of Dr. Ranganathan are the fundamental laws of library science which were propounded in the year 1931. Though more than 80 years have passed they are as useful as they were in their starting time but with some modifications. Various variants of Dr. Ranganathan’s Laws have been made in the changing environment of information and communication technology, this article explores most of them and discusses their implications in new era.


INTRODUCTION
Shiyali Ramainrita Ranganathan, better known as S. R. Rangnathan, was an Indian mathematician who later became a librarian.He was born on August 9, 1892, in the Shiyali village of the Tanjavoor District in the state of Tamil Nadu.Matriculation was awarded to him by S.M. Hindu High School at Shiyali in 1908-09, and he went on to enroll in the junior intermediate class at Madras Christian College in March of 1909.In March and April of 1913, he received a first-class grade for his Bachelor of Arts degree.It was in June of that year that he enrolled in the Master of Arts programme in Mathematics with Professor Edward B. Ross serving as his instructor.He was successful in passing this examination in 1916.After completing his master's degree, he was given a position as an Assistant Lecturer in a Government College in Mangalore and Coimbatore between the years 1917and 1921. Later, in July 1921, he joined Presidency College in Madras as an Assistant Professor of Mathematics.However, he left the College in January 1924 to accept a position as the first librarian of Madras University Dhiman & Rani (2015).After that, according to Dhiman & Rani (2015), he went to England for a nine-month studyplus-observation tour to learn library science.Upon his return to India, Ranganathan established a school of library science in 1929, initially operating it under the auspices of the Madras Library Association and subsequently moving it under the jurisdiction of Madras University.
He served the university as Director for close to 15 years during his career.During the university's centenary celebrations in 1957, he gave the university one lakh rupees, the entirety of his life's savings, to endow a chair in library science.This chair is now known as the Sarada Ranganathan Professorship in Library Science.Additionally, he has worked in a variety of capacities for the Banaras Hindu University in Benaras and the Delhi University in Delhi.In addition to this, he played a significant role in the establishment of the Documentation Committee of the Indian Standards Institution and served as chairman of the organisation until 1967.In 1962, he also established the Documentation Research and Training Centre in Bangalore, which was to operate under the auspices of the Indian Statistical Institute.From 1962 until 1972, he held the position of Honorary Professor at this Centre.After an eventful and productive life of 80 years, he passed away on September 27, 1972.He penned sixty books and two thousand articles on a variety of topics pertaining to library science.

RANGANTHAN'S FIVE LAWS
The five laws of Ranganathan offer a paradigm of how libraries operate, how they grow and serve, and how they live.As a result, they offer us a framework through which to examine both our professional lives and the libraries in which we work.At an Educational Conference that was held in Chidambaram (Tamil Nadu) in December 1928, he presented a formal explanation of these laws for the first time.He was the first person to ever state them.However, it was until the year 1931 they could be published in the book form.It is possible to summarise his "Five Laws of Library Science" as follows: • Books are for use.
• Every reader his book.
• Every book Its reader.
• Save the time of the reader.
• A Library is a growing organism.

VARIANTS OF RANGANATHAN'S FIVE LAWS
When Ranganathan presented his Five Laws of Library Science, he did so with the intention of providing a comprehensive framework and guideline for evaluating library programmes and activities as well as for developing library policies and strategies.This is made abundantly clear by the fact that more than eight decades after their initial publication, these assertions are still receiving a significant amount of attention in the form of citations Connaway & Faniel (2015).However, when Ranganathan used the expression "books and readers," he naturally meant that books stand for knowledge and information and readers stand for users of library and information services.However, in contemporary studies of knowledge and information and all related expressions, it is important to note that the carriers and channels of information and knowledge have shifted from print to other forms, but all of the services are revolving around information and users.As a result, the dimensions of services have significantly expanded in scope, despite the fact that the fundamental philosophy underlying services has not changed.
Therefore, these five laws might be restated to suit the changing context and modern developments taking place in the world of libraries and information science.When, the word Documentation came into vogue, Ranganathan (1963) himself revised these laws as follows: • Documents are for use.
• Every reader his document.
• Every document its reader • Save the time of the reader.
• A library is a growing organism.
However, in later years, many different versions of his laws were proposed to account for the shifting environment.In Bhattacharya (1984) reading of them, he substituted the word "information" for the word "books," and he presented them in revised form.Thompson (1992) rewrote Ranganathan's laws to argue against the existence of libraries and to support the notion that bookselling and reading should be viewed as lucrative businesses.
Gorman's variants were developed after Ranganathan's original laws were published.Gorman (1995), Gorman (1998) proposed additional variants for Ranganathan's laws.This was followed by Satija (2003) and Bjorneborn (2004), who, in Bjorneborn's PhD thesis titled "Small-World Link Structures across an Academic Web Space -a Library and Information Science Approach," attempted to rephrase the five laws in the context of Link.In the research paper titled "Application of Ranganathan's Laws to the Web," written by Noruzi (2004), the word "book" was changed to "web." In their respective Editor's Notes, Dasgupta (2007) and Simpson (2008) use the term "media" rather than the word "books."Sen (2008), on the other hand, has substituted the term "e-resources" for "books" and proposed his own set of five laws.More recently, Shadrach (2015) has used the term 'knowledge' instead of 'book' and reproduced the five laws (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fivelaws of library science), and Munigal (2016) advocated the inclusion of social tools and came out with the new laws in the context of social media (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fivelaws of library science).
Table 1 summarizes all the variants of Ranganathan's Five Laws of Library Science.Thus, many variants of Ranganathan's laws are made but the 'soul' of them is as same as they were during their formulation time.Anyhow, the original conception and new conceptions of Ranganathan' laws are reflected as shown in Table 2 (based on Connaway & Faniel (2015).Netflix is for watching.

Table 1
Blackboard is for writing.
Second Law Every person his or her book.
Every listener her iTunes.
Every artist his Photoshop.
Every student her EasyBib.
Third Law Every book its reader.
Every blog its reader.
Every Google Map, its traveler.

Every digital repository its
researcher.
Fourth Law Save the time of the reader.
Save the time of the listener.
Save the time of the traveler.
Save the time of the researcher.
Fifth Law A library is a growing organism.
More recently, Safii (2018) has also redefined Ranganathan's laws in the perspective of digital environment.Table 3 reflects his intentions in changing environment of ICT and digital era as shown in Table 3.  Connaway & Faniel (2015) have proposed that Ranganathan's Five Laws of Library Science can be reordered and reinterpreted to reflect today's library resources and services, as well as the behaviours that people exhibit when interacting with them.They suggested that these changes should be made in order to account for the historical context in which the laws were formulated.The purpose of their publication is to offer a timely and pertinent context for Ranganathan's laws, which modern librarians, library researchers, and information scientists can refer to when they are considering making changes in practise and developing agendas for future research.They hope that their work will be published so that others can benefit from it.Connaway & Faniel (2015) have reversed the Ranganathan's Laws and interpreted them as shown in Table 4. Every book its reader.

REVERSAL OF FIVE LAWS
Increase the discoverability, access and use of resources within users' existing workflows.
A library is a growing organism.
A library is a growing organism.
Thus, it is seen from above details that various variants are devised of the Ranganathan's laws: some of them are in favour of Ranganathan's philosophy but some are opponents of them, especially when comes to 'fifth law that is library is a growing organism".Actually, the Ranganathan's philosophy was that the library will always grow in their size, collection and staff but today's libraries are shrinking due to less space occupied by online digital resources.However, supporters of Ranganathan still argue that libraries are growing because their collection is increasing but it is not physically rather virtually.
So more than 80 years have been passed, Dr. Ranganathan's Five Laws are still relevant today for library science.However, by changing how we think about the five laws in terms of interpretation and order of importance, they hope to reflect the current resources and services available for use and the behaviours that people demonstrate when engaging with them.

CONCLUSION
Therefore, in conclusion, it can be stated that Ranganathan's laws -even when taken verbatim today without any changes or additions, they are still useful to the same extent as they were when Ranganathan formulated them.They provide a framework to keep the focus on the fundamental principles of librarianship, which have remained remarkably consistent over the course of time despite the incredible changes that have occurred in information technology.However, because of the passage of time and the changes that have occurred in the methods of acquiring and disseminating information, certain shifts are unavoidable.These laws, as discussed, can be used anywhere with some modifications.
In addition, as stated by Sen (2008) for temples; for search engines and institutional repositories as stated by Babu (2011) and for museum, classrooms, hospitals etc. as stated by Dutta (2014).They can even be modified and used for other purposes.Nevertheless, the laws can be interpreted as an imperative for librarians to muster the boldness and courage to evolve their libraries in accordance with user needs, to embrace new roles, and to abandon roles that are becoming obviated.This is because the laws require librarians to abandon roles that are becoming obviated Carr (2014).Carr adds more that in a significant sense, embracing the message of the five laws is only half of the challenge additionally; the librarians must develop strategies to compel user communities to actually apply their agency as constructors of meaning.Carr is referring to the fact that the five laws have been around for a long time.
However, libraries and information centres must adopt marketing tools and promotion tools such as exhibitions and displays, posters, signposts, bulletin boards, electronic billboards, flyers, advertisements, blogs, twitter, flickr, YouTube, mass media, proper and catching labelling, library guides and newsletters, extension activities, library tours, library week/day, ICT-based channels such as websites, email, and web links/hyperlinks, etc. Bhatt (2011) in order to make use of these laws.