STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION FOR EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: LESSONS FROM HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
1 (PhD),
Lecturer, English Department, National University of Lesotho, Lesotho
|
ABSTRACT |
||
The researcher has observed that employees at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Southern Africa are aware of the importance of strategic planning, hence the formulation of strategic plans, but the concern arises at the implementation thereof. Therefore, the paper assesses the extent to which HEIs in Southern Africa utilise strategic communication for engagement of employees for implementation of their institutional strategy. Purposive sampling was used to identify HEIs in Southern Africa. In addition to this, an exploratory research design was used to establish if the strategic plan existed in each institution, and to find out strategies used to implement the strategic plan. The researcher used the explorative study because of the curiosity and desire to understand the influence strategic communication has on the implementation of the strategy. Strategic plans for the HEIs under study were assessed in order to find out if they indicate engagement of the employees and whether there are particular strategic measures proposed to solicit input of the employees in both the development and implementation of the strategic plan. Strategic plans were analysed to assess the degree to which strategies are implemented in the institutions. The study not
only indicates the drivers, best practices and lessons of a communication
strategy, but also suggests that when the organisation takes a strategic
approach to communication, communication becomes integral to the formulation
and implementation of strategy. It further suggests best ways to implement
strategic plan using a communication strategy. |
|||
Received 21 September 2023 Accepted 22 October 2023 Published 06 November 2023 Corresponding Author Relebohile
Letlatsa, rm.letlatsa@nul.ls DOI 10.29121/granthaalayah.v11.i10.2023.4731 Funding: This research
received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors. Copyright: © 2023 The
Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License. With the
license CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download,
reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work
must be properly attributed to its author. |
|||
Keywords: Strategic Communication, Employee
Engagement, Strategy Implementation |
1. INTRODUCTION
Organisational communication is deemed
the most significant factor to determine the
behaviour of the organisation. Organisation success has got a lot to do with the communicative efforts of such organisation Grunig et al. (1992), hence
organisations draw up their vision and mission statements with the aim of achieving such statements through communication. According to the systems approach, an organisation comprises the subsystems whose performance
affects the entire system. For
instance, one managerial department may contribute to either success or failure of the organisation,
hence management relies on communication
professionals to liaise with the organisation’s employees.
Like any other organisation, HEIs
comprise a very vast number of
employees with different languages, race and culture, all of which have to work
in unity for the benefit
of institutions. It therefore calls for employees
to learn and understand
cultures of other people. But first of all they have to develop knowledge of their
own culture in order to facilitate the cross-cultural relationship they have to maintain
Patel et al. (2011). In other
words the responsibility of
organisational diversity primarily rests on employees’ shoulders.
The study therefore assesses the
situation of strategy implementation at HEIs in Southern Africa
and suggests best ways to implement the strategy using communication. To
obtain information from the institutions, the
researcher employed a qualitative research approach to analyse strategic plan documents available online from
websites of the institutions in order to establish the extent to which the strategy is communicated and implemented.
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The link between strategy and its
implementation has always been very weak
Argenti et al. (2005). The author confirms that top consulting companies have employed countless MBAs to develop strategy for
their clients. Academics at top universities have spent their careers developing frameworks explaining how to
develop better strategies for top companies. However, only a handful of academics and a cadre of tactical consultants primarily at public
relations companies, have struggled with implementation in the
area where it matters most; its communication to a set of varied stakeholders.
The researcher has observed that employees at
HEIs in Southern Africa are aware of the importance of strategic planning hence the formulation of strategic plans
and their availability online, but
the concern arises at implementation thereof.
An issue faced
by HEIs in Southern Africa
is the follow-up sessions pertaining to implementation of
institutional strategies. These sessions are meant to monitor progress of the strategy
in filling up implementation gaps caused by the
previous strategies. Both internal and external stakeholders are responsible
for these activities. This is an
indication that communication strategies of these institutions are not clearly spelt out, as a result
the employees are not communicating to achieve
the goals and missions of the institutions.
Subsequently, a need exists for a clear articulation of how the managers should be
managing the implementation of institutional strategy. However, a
well-developed communication management strategy aimed at improving
communication channels is needed to address this problem. Columbine (2007) emphasises that
communicators have an important part to play in guiding organisations to maintain healthy relationships amongst
employees, corporate reputation and brand
positioning in their respective markets. It is also apparent that communication
is still relegated to a low priority
in business.
3. OVERARCHING GOAL
The study aims at assessing the extent
to which HEIs in Southern Africa
utilise strategic communication in order to implement the strategies set up by the institutions. The study not only
indicates the drivers, best practices and lessons of a communication strategy, but also suggests
that when an institution takes a
strategic approach to communication, communication becomes integral to the formulation and implementation of strategy.
3.1. Specific objectives
The study is guided by the following
specific objectives:
·
To assess the HEIs employee
engagement in the implementation of institutional strategic plans.
·
To establish trends, at
HEIs in Southern Africa, that affect
strategic communication
4. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
In order to address the main goal and objectives of
the research study, relevant theories were reviewed on the basis of key
concepts namely employee engagement and organizational trends that affect
strategic communication.
Griffin (2012) discusses the seven traditions of communication theory as the reactions of people (scholars) when they communicate. The traditions inform the study about the communication
behaviour in the organisations. For
the purpose of this study socio-cultural, cybernetic and systems approach will be dealt
with.
Communication as the creation
and enactment of social reality
has it that the way people view reality is strongly
influenced by the language that they have been
using since they were infants Griffin (2012). It is language that gives a structure to the way people perceive reality. Theorists
therefore believe that it is through the language
used in communication that “reality is produced, maintained, repaired, and transformed”.
Furthermore, theorists mostly focus on
communication as a system of information processing and they are concerned with establishing the manner in which a system operates, any possibility of a system being changed,
and if so, how can one get rid of the change effects in the system.
Griffin (2012) uses friendship as a system in which one wants to find out the amount of
communication that may exist between the friends, how close the friendship is, how committed friends are to see
the relationship go on. The bottom
line here is friendships do not exist in a vacuum, so do the organisations. They are systems that exist
within a network of subsystems that has the
information. This therefore confirms
that a system cannot function
in a vacuum, there has to be constituent parts of the system to communicate. And as the employees relate
in a work situation
(institution) they have to show commitment in ensuring achievement of the set goals and strategy.
Organizations are made up of components
or subsystems that work together to achieve a shared objective and ensure the
success of the organization as a whole. According to Grunig et al. (1992), systems theory places more focus on the interfaces that
exist between organizations and the surroundings that surround them, subsystems
within the organization, and the organization as a whole. Additionally, Katz
and Kahn in Shockley-Zalabak (2005) point out that the majority of formal organizations run on
five fundamental subsystems: productive subsystems, which deal with work
completed; supportive subsystems, which deal with relationships and needed
material support; maintenance subsystems, which integrate people into their
functional role; and adaptive subsystems, which are geared for change. and
managerial subsystems for coordination and control of the various subsystems.
Theorists recommend an optimization
principle that advances maximal output in exchange for minimal input.
Environmental feedback and management's capacity for change have an impact on
the maximum return for the least amount of input. Systems can therefore be
classified as open or closed, mechanical or organic. Shockley-Zalabak further
confirms that an open system communicates with its larger surroundings to
exchange information. While a closed system restricts communication with the
outside world and aims to function alone. The closed organizational system is
compared to the closed thermodynamic system by systems theorists, who claim
that both will eventually reach a situation of maximum entropy and cease to be
capable of performing productive labour. The
open system, on the other hand, fights
entropy and seeks
a dynamic equilibrium among
input, throughput, and output. The open system exhibits the law of equifinality and has a sound
self-corrective mechanism, Shockley-Zalabak (2005), Littlejohn (2002).
Institutions operate on the basis of
objectives and goals which need to be
communicated to the employees in order for them to be achieved. In other words, it is upon the management to select means
of communicating the message (strategy)
to the employees so that the strategy gets implemented. Littlejohn (2002) therefore poses strategy selection and goal as important
elements of communication theory. In pursuance of the organisational goal, people have to devise
messages based on their
goals. This involves
the theory of compliance by the employees towards the message disseminated
by management. Compliance calls for sufficient
resources within the organisation so to provide the expected reaction
Organisational structure plays
important role in identifying subunits that
are responsible for strategic communication and implementation of
strategy. Steyn (2003).
proposes a model with which organisational communication strategy can be developed; (a) an analyses of
organisation’s internal environment has to be made so to take care of corporate
profile, vision, mission
and factors such as organisational values, culture, policies
and strategies; (b) stakeholders and publics have to be identified in both internal and external environment by making an analysis of the
organisation’s enabling, functional, normative and diffused linkages; however, many organisations have noticed that it is
difficult to convince external stakeholders about
the organisation’s deeds if employees
do not accept the message
and vice versa (Cheney & Christensen, 2001);
(c) major strategic issues internal and external to the organisation have to be identified, described and differentiated; (d) organisations
have to identify implications of individual strategic matter for each
stakeholder; (e) decisions must be
taken as what should be communicated in order to solve a
specific problem, this may be done by formulating strategic communication plan
as well as action plans that
surround communication goals.
Organizations
use a variety of models to achieve their goals both within and outside of the
organization. According to Grunig and White (1992) and Grunig (1992) and Grunig (1992), some organizations use a
two-way symmetrical model that involves the use of research and dialogue to
manage any conflict that may arise, to advance understanding, and to build
relationships with the environment, whereas a two-way asymmetrical model advocates
for a change in the behavior of the environment without attempting to change
the behavior of the organization itself.
According to Clampitt
(2010), culture encompasses the entirety of the symbolic environment. In
other words, it presents the reality of an aspect, in this case the reality of
an organization, including what it is, what it should be, and what it is
capable of becoming. It focuses on the activities and interactions that staff
members notice. Additionally, it outlines what matters, what causes things in
organizations, and how events outside of employees' daily lives affect them.
Once more, culture sets the standards and values for employees. Therefore, organizational culture is a group
of views and values that are present in the organization, shared by all
employees, but manifested in various ways. Culture can promote particular types
of growth, encourage specific types of corporate growth, or eliminate certain
types of behavior. Additionally, organizational culture may appear stable even
though it occasionally seems to be changing in response to new, ongoing
challenges. Employees frequently focus their efforts on things that the company
values and disregard the rest.
According
to studies, a company's culture has an impact on its financial performance.
According to Clampit (2010), businesses that
are in line with their culture always succeed. Through the appropriate culture,
structure, and strategy, employees are given focus, purpose, and incentive.
When senior management is effectively directing actions, a strong culture makes
it possible for employees to read their thoughts, which encourages innovation
and results in high productivity and profits.
Second,
culture affects how an organization analyzes and resolves issues. Due to the
adage "that's how we do things here," it is discovered that more
important possibilities are not taken into consideration. Additionally, it is
thought that culture affects how an organization handles change. If the
necessity arises, it might inspire ongoing change that is decisive.
Finally, culture has an impact on
customer satisfaction and employee motivation. When an organization outlines
some ideals but does not put them into practice, it might have a detrimental
impact on employees Letlatsa (2018). Customers can lose motivation when a company makes
promises to them, such offering fair prices, but does not follow through.
Employees favor managers who prioritize putting the needs of their team before
adhering to laws and regulations.
Additionally, Eisenberg and Riley (2001) point out that managers who show an interest in the culture
of their workforce frequently value suggestions from various stakeholders and
frequently use them to reshape current organizations and build new ones that
could serve as alternatives to hierarchical organizational structures that
follow top-down models.
Strong organizational cultures can pose
problems since they can cause opposition to existing procedures. In other
words, the organization's strategies and needs must be consistent with the
culture Clampitt (2010). According to
Clampitt, it is only advisable for managers to teach employees the
organization's values because workers typically do not realize the value of
their work until after they have completed it. As a result, workers should
translate the organization's rhetoric into individualized, subjective
commitments and experiences. On the other hand, managers shape the
organization's values, mission, and purpose statements into ones that are
neither overly vague nor excessively specific. Additionally, Eisenberg and Riley (2001) note that supervisors that demonstrate an interest in the
culture of their staff
Recent events that have occurred in
HEIs in Southern Africa are proof of a robust culture that has long been in
place. Although South Africa is thought to be a diverse nation, recent raucous
political incidents in HEIs do not demonstrate integration. Universities are
regarded by society as the ideal institutions to represent moral leadership and
to be held in higher regard than the general public. "They should be used
as a platform to engage with young minds and address issues around race and
difference openly, constructively, and frankly" Marieclaire
(2014). When this information is taken into account and successfully
used, it aids a company in realizing the variety of its members and avoiding
treating them with contempt Putnam and Mumby (2014).
5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
5.1. SAMPLING
In order to achieve representativeness Teddlie and Yu (2007). of the HEIs in Southern Africa, purposive sampling was used to obtain strategic plans from the institutions. This approach was used in order to address research objectives and since this is a case study research, cases that were found to be informative in terms of online availability of strategic plans were used.
Out of 10 Southern African
countries, 5 were explored in order to obtain access to
strategic plans available online. Therefore, the following universities’
strategic plans were accessed; The
Copperbelt University (Zambia), University of Malawi- The Polytechnic (Malawi), University of Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe),
National University of Lesotho
(Lesotho) and University of Pretoria (South Africa), Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1 Sampled Universities of Southern Africa |
||
Institution |
Country |
Strategic Plan Dates |
The Copperbelt University |
Zambia |
2014-2018 |
University of Malawi
– The Polytechnic |
Malawi |
2010-2014 |
University of Zimbabwe |
Zimbabwe |
2011-2015 |
National University of Lesotho |
Lesotho |
2015-2020 |
University of Pretoria |
South
Africa |
2015-2025 |
The researcher then made use of content
analysis for strategic plans to reveal
possible trends that affect institutional communication; to establish employees and institutional focus and attention of
activities that take place in the institutions; as well as to describe
trends in HEIs in
Southern Africa that affect strategic communication Weber
(1990).
5.2. DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
The level of approach for content
analysis was at words and key phrases. Coding
was done to illustrate occurrence, frequency and contextual similarity. All
meaningful instances of data were coded to allow for generalisation around the content Babbie and Mouton (2001) as
thus the use of Computer
Aided Qualitative Analysis
Software (CAQDAS), Leximancer, enhanced exploration of instances that relate to the coded concepts Manual (2005).
Leximancer was used by the researcher because it provides a
map of concepts and themes that recur in the texts and is systematic and
graphic in how it presents data. According to Indulska and Recker (2008), Leximancer was used for the following purposes: (a)
establishing the key ideas in a text and their relative importance using a
scientific and objective algorithm; (b) determining the centrality of a
concept; (c) assisting with the application of grounded theory analysis to a
textual dataset; and (d) assisting with the visual exploration of textual
information for related themes.
By entering text into the CAQDAS
algorithm for coding, the researcher improved validity. Thematic development
was done automatically through code. In this instance, concepts from strategic
plans in existence at the five HEIs in Southern Africa were analyzed using
content analysis. In order to measure the co-occurrence of these concepts, the
program additionally examined the relationships between the concepts that were
found Manual (2005).
More
concepts were grouped together into themes whose significance was denoted by
colored circles. In other words, faint circles signify fewer common concepts
whereas brighter circles indicate co-occurring concepts more frequently. Each
theme is determined by the most prevalent and related concepts.
6. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
Content analysis of strategic plans of
HEIs in Southern Africa
This section provides a detailed
content analysis of strategic plans of HEIs in Southern
Africa that are operational. Table 2 summarises the findings of the content analysis. Subsequent
to this, a textual narrative is presented
to contextualise the findings.
Table 2
Table 2 Findings of Content Analysis |
||
Word-like |
Count |
Relevance |
Staff |
197 |
100 |
Student |
94 |
48 |
Management |
93 |
47 |
Plan |
76 |
39 |
Commitment |
75 |
38 |
Implementation |
70 |
36 |
Access |
53 |
27 |
Strategy |
35 |
18 |
collaborative |
29 |
15 |
Engagement |
20 |
10 |
Communication |
17 |
09 |
Communicate |
16 |
08 |
Culture |
16 |
08 |
Channels |
14 |
07 |
Diverse |
11 |
06 |
Monitor |
9 |
05 |
Language |
7 |
04 |
Trends |
7 |
04 |
Depend |
6 |
03 |
Inter |
6 |
03 |
Structure |
5 |
03 |
Meetings |
5 |
03 |
Engage |
4 |
02 |
formulation |
4 |
02 |
|
|
|
The researcher analysed content of the
HEIs strategic plans to assess constructs used
to indicate employee involvement in formulation of strategic plan.
This was meant
to address the third objective of the study in which the researcher aim at assessing the involvement
of institutions of
higher learning employees
towards the implementation of the strategy. The following excerpts
were extracted from the 5 universities’ strategies.
University
of Zimbabwe (UZ) must clearly satisfy the
needs of its clients and customers,
and internal stakeholders…. The implementation of strategic plan will be the responsibility of all UZ members
under the leadership of vice-chancellor, Deans
and Directors, Chairpersons and Heads, Deans of faculties will ensure the faculty
strategic plans are prepared to dovetail into the overall
UZ strategic plan….With regard to the consultation
process, each member of the strategic plan sub-committee
was assigned to several units in the university to collect necessary inputs from UZ members.
University
of Pretoria (UP) captures the core
strategies of the university over the next
15 years by e.g. embedding community engagement and civic commitment in its academic
mission; embracing diversity to enrich the university’s intellectual environment and improve graduate outcomes….To
establish a corps of staff,
university will reward incentives and awards for success and this will be
indicated by diversity of staff
composition (per department).
University
of Malawi-The Polytechnic aims at
improving governance and management
by, inter alia, calling for well-trained and well-motivated academic and administrative staff….Development
process was a thoroughly participatory process
involving all departments, units, institutes, directorates, schools, and
members of council as well as other stakeholders outside the university…. In addition to shared
values, all departments, units, directorates, institutes and schools of the university shall aim to address among
others, gender equality, trans-/multi-disciplinary
collaborations.
The
National University of Lesotho (NUL)
plan’s critical success factors include
committed leadership to the plan, senior management team, and the buy-in of the
internal stakeholders (staff and students).
Furthermore, the researcher used
Leximancer to measure presence and frequency
of concepts that appeared in the form of words and phrases from the strategic plans. Relationship between identified
concepts was also measured based on the co- occurrence of concepts obtained
within the text;
as thus Leximancer enabled both content and relational analysis of
the documents. A Concept map was generated to
illustrate themes and related concepts Figure 1. Themes are clustered according to their importance. In other words, the most important theme appears in the highest percentage of
occurrence Manual
(2011).
The
theme staff appears to be the most co-occurring and relates to the concept management. It portrays
100 percent connectivity Table 3 with the content of the
text. It is the hottest
theme as thus this is interpreted as being a positive indication of staff engagement
in strategies of the institutions. Staff and
management are the most active
elements of the planning and implementation of
the institutional strategies. The essence of strategic leadership then
lies in communicating in a way that employees
and functional units align themselves and move forward towards the commonly shared strategic goals Puth (2002).
Figure 1
Figure 1 Concept Map of Institutions' Strategic Plans |
Table 3
Table 3 Theme/Concept Co-Occurrence |
||
Theme |
Connectivity % |
Concepts |
Staff |
100 |
Staff,
management |
Student |
53 |
Student, access, culture, language |
Implementation |
48 |
Implementation, engagement, depend |
Collaborative |
36 |
Collaborative, communicate, monitor, diverse |
Commitment |
24 |
Commitment, communication |
Plan |
23 |
Plan |
Strategy |
09 |
Strategy |
Trends |
05 |
Trends |
Channels |
02 |
Channels |
Meetings |
02 |
Meetings |
Inter |
01 |
Inter |
Formulation |
01 |
Formulation |
Engage |
01 |
Engage |
|
|
|
Student appears as the second most co-occurring theme. In an institution students act as functional
units. 53% of co-occurrence of this theme is another positive sign that
strategy focuses on the students whose presence
is the core business of institutions. The theme associates with access,
culture and language,
which may infer that students are highly involved in their organisational culture, the language used
as medium of instruction and access to facilities. Puth (2002) supports this by posting that communication must be
integrated and proficient at
delivering harmonious message to all constituents. That is, the organisation integrates its communication
activities down to specific messages, such as
the mandate to be direct in all times. In addition to this, the culture
that exists within the institution
is bound to affect the way employees communicate because it is through the language they use that meanings
are attached to actions performed. It is this view that institutions have to take
into consideration the role played by socio-cultural
domain in the implementation of strategy Griffin (2012).
Implementation is
related to engagement and depend. It is a bit below 50 percent which may be regarded as
demarcation of theme importance, 48 percent
becomes the rate at which
institutions plan to put the strategy into action. Strategy implementation involves
“communication, interpretation, adoption and enactment of strategic plans” and management aligns leadership,
organisational culture,
organisational structures, reward systems and resource allocation based on specific strategies Cronjé (2005).
The next theme is collaborative at co-occurrence rate of 36 percent and it is associated with communicate, monitor and diverse.
Employees select counterparts to communicate with because they notice some form of similarity in terms of age, education, gender,
prestige, social class, tenure and occupation (hence they categorise
themselves according to those factors) which are believed to ease communication and increase
predictability of behaviour as well as fostering
trust (Brass 1995b in Monge & Contractor (2001)).
As the employees relate in a work situation,
they have to show commitment in
ensuring the achievement of the set goals and strategy. It is apparent that strategies indicate little commitment from employees as it
co-occurs 24 percent times only. The
implementation does not only challenge the management in terms of motivating employees, but also in
terms of discipline, commitment and sacrifice
required to achieve the implementation Cronjé (2005).
The theme, channels, appears least in the text and yet it plays important
role in communicating
strategies. Institutions should be in a good position to select channels to use to communicate strategy. Strategic communication is used in the
organisation to determine
ways available to the organisation for effective planning and implementation of strategies.
The process requires employees to establish
available resources and select potential lines of argument
that will allow them to pursue the set goals and missions
strategically Conrad and Poole (2005).
Meetings, formulation and engage are
themes which co-occur between 1 and 2
percent in the text and yet they are very significant themes which underpin employee engagement in strategy formulation and implementation. Most of the activities that take place in the organisation
involve exchange of oral, written and non-verbal
messages between people who work toward achievement of same goals. Such activities include holding meetings
amongst members of the departments or between
the departments, planning
how the organisation will interact. O’Hair et al. (2011) attest that employees have to have a good understanding of organisational communication so that they
know what alternatives to use when they are faced with tasks that may need to
be efficiently and effectively accomplished.
7. LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
Although the strategies indicate that
their implementation relies on internal
stakeholders, the documents are not in a state of indicating whether it is for
real that implementation of
institutional intents is actually communicated to employees hence the paper has not captured the rate
at which strategy is communicated and
implemented.
8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is evident
that HEIs in Southern Africa have strategies to guide operations of institutions. Content
analysis has revealed
that strategies do engage employees in formulation and
implementation of strategies. The documents
however neither disclose the extent to which strategies are communicated and implemented within institutions and
whether they do have in place communication strategies nor do they indicate strategy used to communicate
institutions’ intents. As a result, it is not
stated if there are any trends that affect strategic communication.
Therefore,
understanding and analysing culture is crucial for all types of organizations
and institutions, including businesses, churches, universities, government
agencies, student clubs, and others. This increases the requirement to
categorize institutional and organizational conducts and practices into
recognizable groups and the urge to comprehend the communication context
(Eisenberg & Riley, 2001). Then, it is said that patterns of human
behaviour and meaning make up organizational culture. Communication is still an
interactive feature through which all potential enabling and limiting forces
must travel, especially in light of the perception that human behaviours have
an impact on social and organizational systems. Employee empowerment and
education may arise from regular discussions on organizational culture,
identity, and the change process inside institutions.
Moreover, there is a need for employees to know their role in the institution, what is expected of them and what they stand to benefit from decisions made within the institutions. As such, strategic
communication emerges as it concentrates on “how the
organisation presents and promotes itself” by the help of its internal stakeholders Hallahan et al. (2007).
Additionally, a need exists
for a clear articulation of how management should be managing
the implementation of strategy. A well-developed communication management strategy aimed
at improving communication channels is needed
to address this problem. Furthermore, the same communication channels
can be used by employees to identify,
within organisational structures, oppressive areas which will in turn enable
identification of diversity of the members of the organisation Putnam and Mumby (2014). As thus communicators have an important part to play in guiding businesses to maintain
healthy relationships with employees, corporate
reputation and brand positioning in their respective markets Columbine (2007).
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
None.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.
REFERENCES
Argenti, P. A, Howell, R, A & Beck, K. B. (2005). The Strategic Communication Imperative. MITSloan Management Review, 46(3).
Babbie, E. (2007). The Practice of Social Research (11th Ed.). USA : Thomson Wadsworth.
Columbine, N. (2007). Connecting Communication to Strategy to
Achieve Better Business Results. Journal of Marketing, 7.
Cowan, D. (2014). Strategic Internal
Communication : How to Build Employee Engagement and Performance. London : Cogan Page.
Creswell, J.W., & Clark, P.V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). USA : Sage.
Cronjé, S. (2005). The Drivers of Strategy Implementation. In Ehlers, T & Lazenby, K. (eds). Strategic Management : Southern African Concepts and Cases. Pretoria : Van Schaik.
Eisenberg, E.M., & Riley, P. (2001). Organisational Culture. In Jablin, F.S & Putnam, L.L (eds.), The New Handbook Organisational Communication : Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
Farwell, J.P. (2012). Persuasion and Power : The Art of Strategic Communication. Washington : Georgetown University Press.
Griffin, E.A. (2012). First Look at Communication Theory. (8th ed.). USA : Mc Grawhill.
Grunig, J.E. (1992). What is Excellence in
Management ? In : Grunig, J.E. et al (eds.), Excellence in Public Relations and
Communication Management. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Grunig, J.E. & Hunt,T. (1984). Managing Public Relations.
NY : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Grunig, J.E., & White, J. (1992).
The Effect of Worldviews on Public Relations Theory and Practice. In : Grunig,
J.E. et al (eds.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillside, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grunig, L.A. (1992). How Public Relations/ Communication Departments Should Adapt to the Structure and Environment of an Organisation and What They Actually do. In: Hallahan,K., et al. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1): 3-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
Grunig, L.A., Grunig, J.E., &
Ehling, W.P. (1992). What is an Effective Organisation ? In: Grunig,
J.E. et al. (eds), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management.
Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hallahan, K., et al. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1): 3-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
Indulska, M., & Recker, J.C. (2008). Design Science in IS research; A Literature Analysis. In Gregor, S and Jo, S. (Eds), Proceedings 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information System Foundations, Canberra, Australia.
Letlatsa, Relebohile Magdalene Matsepo. (2018). "Implementation of a Communication Strategy for Stakeholder Engagement in Institutions of Higher Learning in Lesotho." PhD diss., University of Pretoria. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.1080/02500167.2023.2260580
Leximancer. (2011). Leximancer manual version 4.
Littlejohn, S.W. (2002). Theories Human Communication. (7th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Claire, M. (2014).
Marie Claire : Think Smart Look Amazing.
Mintzeberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J.
(1998). Strategy Safari : the Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic
Management. London : FT Prentice Hall.
Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2001). Emergence of Communication
Networks. In Jablin, F.M., & Putnam, L.L. (eds), The New Handbook of Organisational
Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. US: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986243.n12
O’Hair, D., Friedrich, W.G., & Dixon, L.D.
(2011). Strategic Communication in Business and the Professions. USA :
Pearson.
Patel, F., Li, M., & Sooknanan, P. (2011).
Intercultural Communication : Building a Global Community. Califonia : SAGE.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270318
Puth, G. (2002). The Communicating Leader ; The Key to Strategic Alignment. (2nd ed.). South Africa: Van Schaik.
Putnam, L., & Mumby, D.K. (2014). Sage Handbook of Organisational Communication: Advances in Theory,
Research and Methods. Sage. https://univofpretoria.on.worldcat.org/search?queryString=au:Linda.%20Putnam&databaseList=283.638
Raman, M., &. Singh, A. (2010). Business Communication. India: Oxford University Press. https://india.oup.com/product/business-communication-9780198077053
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow : PEARSON Education Limited.
Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2005). Fundamentals of Organisational Communication : Knowledge, Sensitivity, Skills, Values. (3rd ed.). USA : Longman Publishers.
Steyn, B. (2003). From Strategy to Corporate Communication Strategy: a Conceptualisation. Jounal of Communication Management, 8(2) 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540410807637
Teddlie, C. & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling : a Typology with Examples. Journal of Mixed
Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
© Granthaalayah 2014-2023. All Rights Reserved.