Granthaalayah
Effect of time and IBA concentration on the performance of bay leaf layering

Effect of time and IBA concentration on the performance of bay leaf layering


Principal Scientific Officer, Regional Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangaldesh
Scientific Officer, Regional Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangaldesh
Senior Scientific Officer, Regional Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangaldesh
Chief Scientific Officer, Regional Spices Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangladesh

How to cite this article (APA): Mozumder, SN, Kamal, MM, Haque, MI, & Shahiduzzaman, M (2021). Effect of time and iba concentration on the performance of bay leaf layering. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(7), 15. doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i7.2021.4047

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in a factorial Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with six levels of IBA viz. 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000ppm and control (without IBA) with five times of layering in the middle (15th) of each April, May, June, July and August at the Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur during May 2017 to September 2018. Bay leaf layering was found very much unsuccessful with or without IBA treatment. Layering time and IBA concentration significantly influence on the success and rooting of layers under Bangladesh condition. May to July layering with 4000 ppm IBA treatment found better for successful air layering for vegetative propagation of bay leaf in Bangladesh.

Keywords

Performance, Leaf Layering, Effect

INTRODUCTION

Bay leaf is a high valued spices having valuable aroma, higher nutritive and medicinal value widely used in Bangladesh for preparation of many kinds of foods, beverage, cosmetics and medicines. The demands are usually meet up by importing from other countries which required a huge expenditure. The quality of imported bay leaf is poor due to admixture, sub-standard processing and long storage and transport duration. Production of bay leaf can be increased using BARI released Bay leaf (BARI Bay leaf-1) variety having better aroma, higher leaf yield and stress tolerant habit. Homesteads, hilly and highlands are suitable for their cultivation. Lack of quality saplings are the major constraints for expanding the growing area. Standard vegetative propagation technology of Bay leaf has not yet been standardized in Bangladesh. Development of appropriate vegetative propagation techniques of Bay leaf for rapid dissemination of high yielding varieties (BARI Bay leaf-1) is essential to ensure quality bay leaf production. To increase bay leaf production, intensive research on propagation is very much essential in our country. However the study is therefore, undertaken to standardize the propagation techniques using optimum strength of rooting hormone (IBA) concentration and layering time for rapid multiplication of bay leaf to ensure quality sapling production.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The experiment was conducted in a factorial Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with six levels of IBA viz. 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000ppm and control (without IBA) with five times of layering in the middle (15th) of each April, May, June, July and August at the Regional Spices Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur during May 2017 to September 2018. Proximal slanting cut end of 30 cuttings for each treatment were placed in the hormone solutions for five minutes then kept 15 minutes to discard extra solution. After treating with hormone, the cuttings were planted in the 15 cm raised beds of soil, sand and compost mixture at a spacing of 15×10 cm. For better water holding capacity and root development in layering, soil mixture was prepared with 50% loamy soil and 50% well decomposed cow dung and kept open for 2 weeks. Treatment wise hormone solution was taken with a small glass dropper pot applied on the cut surface (from where bark was removed) of the shoot. No hormone was applied for control treatment. Each replication of a single treatment consisting 10 layering shoots and a total of 30 for 3 replications was used and tagged properly. The stool or gooti (air layering) was made by covering the cut portion with 160-180g of moist soil mixture, covered by polythene and tied tightly with jute rope. When a number of roots are established and visible through polythene, the air layering seems suitable to separate from the mother plant. A half cut was given at 1-2 cm below the stool of air layering. After one week, the layering was separated by gentle full cut from the previously cut place and extra branches and leaves were trimmed out. The trimmed layering shoot was planted in previously prepared polybag after removing the ploythene and kept one week under shade then 3 weeks in partial shade for establishment. Air layering seems suitable to plant in the field when a number of roots and shoots were established in polybag. Data on length and number of roots per layering was count breaking the stool just after detachment of layering. The samples of three live stools of layer were broken and the numbers of roots were counted and lengths of roots were measured with a digital slide calipers at 60 days after separation. After separation from the mother plants, success of detached layers and number of leaves were counted at 60 days of planting in the polybag. Data is taken on success rate, days to bud break, leaf and shoot growth, vigour of the saplings, establishment rate, disease and insect pest reaction.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

EFFECT OF TIME ON SUCCESS OF AIR LAYERING

The time of layering had significantly affected the success of layering (Table 1 ). Early rooting was observed in May layering (51.8 days) which was statistically similar with April, June and July while August layering took more (68.1 days) for root visibility. Similar result was observed in separation of layers from the mother plant. Rooting success was similar in all five months but establishment rate was declined after June (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).

Table 1: Effect of layering time on the performance of bay leaf

Layering Time

Days to root visible

Days to cut

% rooting

Establish (% 60 DAS)

% Dead at 60 DAS

Roots /Layer

Length of root (cm)

Branch(nos)

Leaves /layer

April

54.2b

72.6b

42.78

81.82a

17.09e

3.37b

7.27b

3.06a

4.41b

May

51.8b

71.4bc

52.22

76.60a

30.44c

4.31a

8.48a

2.18b

5.18a

June

53.0b

71.9bc

51.11

77.17a

26.22d

4.41a

8.49a

2.25b

5.44a

July

53.0b

68.5c

55.56

68.00b

42.79b

3.63ab

6.74a

1.81c

4.65ab

August

68.1a

87.7a

53.33

51.04c

47.94a

3.59ab

6.21c

1.86c

4.61ab

Significance CV%

* 4.15

* 3.95

NS 6.80

* 6.68

** 8.61

* 6.09

* 6.07

* 10.64

* 6.41

https://www.granthaalayahpublication.org/journals-html-galley/html-images/95bdb26b-0322-436d-a6dc-93677f587d0eimage1.png
Figure 1: Success and establishment of bay leaf layering at different layering time.

Successful layer was slightly higher (5.56) in July layering (Figure 1 ) where higher percentage of rooting (55.56%) also initiated in July layering but establishment rate was higher (81.82%) in April as well as lower establishment rate was recorded (51.04%) in August layering (Table 1 ). Successful layer was lower (2.72) in August layering (Figure 1 )

Death rate of detached layer was higher (47.94%) in August layering and it was minimum in April (17.09%). The lower success in August layering might be due to fall of temperature and lower humidity in October delayed and hampered rooting as well as shoot initiation.

The effect of time of layering was significantly affected on the death of detached layers, number and length of roots, and leaves per layers (Table 1.1). May and June layering gave more number (≥4) of longer (≥8 cm) roots, and leaves (≥5) compared to May, July and August layering. Hot humid weather favors rooting and leaf initiation that caused more rooting and leaves in May and June than April and August layering.

EFFECT OF IBA CONCENTRATION ON BAY LEAF LAYERING

IBA concentration had significant effect on rooting and success of air layering in bay leaf (Table 2 , Figure 2 ). Control treatment and lower dose of IBA took more times to initiate roots compared to higher doses of IBA concentrations. Days to separation of layers from the mother plant was not significantly affected by IBA concentration. The number of successful layer was significantly higher (7.13) and highest rooting (71.33%) found in 4000ppm IBA concentration followed by 5000ppm where number of successful layer was 6.87 and the highest (75.91%) establishment at 60 days was recorded and it was lower(10%) in control.

The number of established layer was significantly higher (78.69%) in 4000ppm of IBA application followed by 5000 ppm IBA (75.91%) and it was lower in control (16.67%). These findings are resembled with the findings of (Sharma & Aier, 1989) the highest rooting percentage in plum was obtained with IBA treatment of cuttings with 2000 mg l−1during summer.

Table 2: Effect of IBA concentrations on the performance of Bay leaf layering

IBA Conc. ( ppm)

Days to root visible

Days to cut

Rooting (%)

Establish (%) 60 DAS

% Dead at 60 DAS

Roots /Layer

Length of root (cm)

No branch

Leaves /layer

1000

58.6b

74.7b

36.67b

56.22c

43.78b

4.20a

8.31a

2.14ab

5.12a

2000

56.5b

73.4b

54.00ab

71.78ab

28.22c

4.05a

8.25a

2.09ab

5.70a

3000

51.7c

69.5c

65.33a

70.02ab

29.98c

4.52a

8.43a

3.83a

5.72a

4000

49.7c

69.3c

71.33a

78.69a

21.31d

4.57a

8.39a

2.27ab

5.82a

5000

49.7c

69.9c

68.67a

75.91a

24.09d

4.50a

8.33a

2.31ab

5.72a

Control

69.9a

89.8a

10.00c

16.67d

50.00a

1.33b

2.93b

0.75b

1.07b

Significance CV%

NS 4.15

NS 3.95

* 6.80

* 6.68

* 8.61

* 6.09

* 6.07

* 10.64

* 6.41

(Southworth & Dirr, 1996) obtained the maximum success (87.5%) of plum cuttings from 1500 ppm K-IBA solution. (Neto, Telles, Antonio, & L, 2006) and (Canli & Sefer, 2009) obtained the highest success using 1000 ppm IBA in cherry cutting and layering. Indole-butyric-acid (IBA) enhanced root development and root growth by enhancing cell division resulted the maximum success of layering compared to control and lower level of IBA concentration (Mozumder et. al., 2014).

https://www.granthaalayahpublication.org/journals-html-galley/html-images/95bdb26b-0322-436d-a6dc-93677f587d0eimage2.png
Figure 2: Success and establishment rate of bay leaf layering at different IBA concentration

There was significant variation of death of layers after detaching from the mother plant, rooting and leaf production with various levels of IBA treatment (Table 2 ). A number of air layering shoots were died in the poly bag after separation from the mother plant. Application of IBA resulted more number (≥4) of longer (≥8 cm) roots compared to control. Numbers of leaves were increased with increasing IBA concentration. The highest number of leaves (5.82/layer) was recorded from the application of 4000ppm IBA which was statically similar in all IBA levels and it was the lowest (1.07/layer) in control. IBA helps to accelerate cell division and root initiation in upper parts of the cut portion of the plant resulted more rooting and leaves with higher doses of IBA.

COMBINED EFFECT OF TIME AND IBA CONCENTRATION IN BAY LEAF LAYERING

Layering time and IBA concentration showed significant effect on rooting and success rate of layers (Table 3a and 3b) in bay leaf. August layering with lower concentration of IBA or control treatment took more 2-3 days compared to April, May, June and July month’s layering for root initiation and separation of layers from the mother plant. Early rooting (45.3 days) was found in May layering with 4000ppm while it was significantly delayed (83.7 days) in August layering without IBA treatment. Bay leaf layers took about 8 weeks to separation that was slightly affected due to layering time but greatly for hormone application. (Singh & Ray, 2011) opined that IBA concentration and layering time influence on success of layering in Ficus sp. The number of successful layer was significantly higher in July layering (7.67, 76.67%) with 4000ppm IBA closely followed by May and August (7.33, 73.33%)with same level IBA application and the success was almost nil (0.33, 3.33%) in April and August layering without IBA.

Table 3: Combined effect of layering time and IBA on success of bay leaf propagation

Time

IBA Conc.

Days to root visible

Days to Separation

Successful layers (nos)

Rooting(%)

Survive (60 DAS)

April

1000

58.0

75.7

3.00d

30.00d

1.67ef

2000

54.3

73.0

4.33cd

43.33cd

3.67cd

3000

50.0

68.0

5.33bc

53.33bc

4.33bc

4000

48.3

67.0

6.67ab

66.67a

5.67ab

5000

48.3

67.0

6.33b

63.33ab

5.67ab

Control

66.0

84.7

0.33f

3.33

0.00g

May

1000

54.7

73.7

4.00c

40.00c

2.67de

2000

51.3

70.7

5.00bc

50.00bc

4.00c

3000

47.7

66.0

6.67ab

66.67a

5.00bc

4000

45.3

66.0

7.33a

73.33a

6.33a

5000

45.7

66.0

6.67ab

66.67a

5.33b

Control

66.0

86.3

1.67e

16.67e

0.67fg

June

1000

56.3

71.7

3.67cd

36.67cd

2.67de

2000

54.3

71.7

5.00bc

50.00bc

4.00c

3000

47.7

67.3

6.33ab

63.33ab

5.00bc

4000

46.7

67.3

7.00ab

70.00a

5.67ab

5000

46.7

67.3

6.67ab

66.67a

5.33b

Control

66.3

86.3

2.00e

20.00e

1.00f

July

1000

56.3

70.0

3.67cd

36.67cd

2.00e

2000

53.7

68.7

6.67ab

66.67a

4.67bc

3000

48.0

65.0

7.00ab

70.00a

4.67bc

4000

46.3

65.0

7.67a

76.67a

5.67ab

5000

46.3

65.0

7.33a

73.33a

5.67ab

Control

67.3

77.3

1.00ef

10.00ef

0.00g

August

1000

67.7

82.7

4.00cd

40.00cd

1.33ef

2000

68.7

83.0

6.00bc

60.00bc

2.67de

3000

65.0

81.0

7.33a

73.33a

3.67cd

4000

62.0

81.0

7.00a

70.00a

4.67bc

5000

61.3

84.3

7.33a

73.33a

4.00c

Control

83.7

114.3

0.33f

3.33f

0.00g

Level of Significance

NS

NS

*

*

*

CV%

4.15

3.95

6.80

6.80

7.59

The lower success in August layering with low IBA is due to fall of temperature and lower hormonal activity hampered rooting. No layer was survived finally from April, July and August layering without IBA application.

Significant variations on survivability of layers after detaching from mother plant, rooting and leaf production due to layering time with various IBA concentrations (Table 1.3.a and 1.3.b). The maximum number and rate of survive layers (6.33, 83.31%) was found in May layering with 4000 ppm IBA treatment and it was statistically similar with April Layering (5.67, 89.61%) with 5000 ppm IBA while it was nil (0%) in April, July and August layering without IBA application. Higher concentration IBA results more number of roots in early June-July layering compared to control and lower concentration of IBA treatment in later layering might be the cause of such variation. The number and length of root did not differ significantly with the range of 2.53 to 4.67 and 7.17-9.33 cm per layers at 60 days with the combination of different IBA concentration with time of layering (Table 3 b).

Table 4: Combined effect of layering time and IBA on success of bay leaf propagation

Time

IBA Conc.

Establish (% 60 DAS)

% Dead at 60 DAS

Roots Layer

Length of root (cm)

Branch/ layer

Leaves /layer

April

1000

55.56c

44.44

3.83

8.50

2.33b

4.50

2000

85.00a

15.00

2.53

8.77

1.43c

5.59

3000

81.11a

18.89

4.42

8.87

2.67a

5.57

4000

86.11a

13.89

4.70

8.93

2.30b

5.44

5000

89.68a

10.32

4.73

8.53

2.27b

5.38

Control

0.00

100.0

-

-

-

-

May

1000

64.44bc

35.56

4.33

8.63

2.33b

5.10

2000

80.56ab

19.44

4.61

8.57

2.17b

5.56

3000

73.57b

26.43

4.82

9.03

2.50a

5.82

4000

86.31a

13.69

4.78

9.10

2.27b

6.31

5000

79.17ab

20.83

4.67

9.33

2.40a

6.29

Control

33.33d

66.67

2.67

6.20

1.40c

2.00

June

1000

72.22b

27.78

4.32

8.80

2.20b

5.33

2000

80.00ab

20.00

4.52

8.20

2.27b

6.00

3000

79.37ab

20.63

4.63

8.27

2.17b

6.07

4000

80.95ab

19.05

4.56

8.27

2.28b

6.02

5000

80.16ab

19.84

4.43

9.00

2.23b

5.91

Control

50.00c

50.00

4.00

8.43

2.33b

3.33

July

1000

55.56bc

44.44

4.33

8.20

2.00bc

5.50

2000

69.84bc

30.16

4.36

8.20

2.17b

5.53

3000

66.67bc

33.33

4.37

8.30

2.30b

5.63

4000

73.81b

26.19

4.37

8.17

2.20b

5.65

5000

77.38b

22.62

4.35

7.60

2.21b

5.59

Control

0.00

100.0

-

-

-

-

August

1000

33.33f

66.67

4.17

7.40

1.83bc

5.17

2000

43.49e

56.51

4.25

7.53

2.42ab

5.83

3000

49.40de

50.60

4.35

7.70

2.18b

5.52

4000

66.27d

33.73

4.44

7.47

2.31b

5.70

5000

53.17cd

46.83

4.33

7.17

2.44ab

5.45

Control

0.00

100.0

-

-

-

-

Significance level CV%

* 6.68

* 8.61

NS 6.09

* 6.07

* 10.64

* 6.41

Number of branches and leaves were increased with increasing IBA concentration in all months of layering. (Kakon, Haque, & Mohsin, 2008) showed that among different varieties BARI guava-1 showed the best performance with different concentrations of growth regulators had significant effect on almost all parameters. IBA at 1200 ppm showed the best performance among the treatments.

The maximum number of leaves (6.31/layer) per layer was recorded from the application of 4000ppm IBA in May layering and lowest (2.0/layer) was found from control in the same time of layering. There was no successful layering in April, July and August without IBA that had no roots or leaves. IBA accelerate cell division and root initiation high temperature and humidity resulted more rooting and leaves with higher doses of IBA in May and June layering.Sing (2001) found that use of IBA was beneficial in enhancing the callus formation, number, length and diameter of both primary and secondary roots and survival of air-layered twigs. This findings are almost similar with the report of (Rymbai & Reddy, 2010) ) that air layers of guava have been successfully achieved by exogenous application of IBA at 4000 ppm.The result from these observations were partially resembled with some findings such as (Sharma et al., 1989) get maximum success with 2000 ppm IBA, (Southworth et al., 1996) obtained from 1500 ppm IBA while (Canli et al., 2009) and (Neto et al., 2006) get the maximum success with 1000 ppm IBA concentration in plum. (AS, 1989) found that highest concentration of IBA (5,000 ppm) proved significantly better for rooting and survival of air layers of Kagzi lime. All the findings were varied because those experiments were conducted in different plants species, environment, soils, climates and times.

CONCLUSION

Bay leaf layering was found very much unsuccessful with or without IBA treatment. Layering time and IBA concentration significantly influence on the success and rooting of layers under Bangladesh condition. May to July layering with 4000 ppm IBA treatment found better for successful air layering for vegetative propagation of bay leaf in Bangladesh.

Creative Commons Licence This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

© Granthaalayah 2014-2021. All Rights Reserved.