RELATIONSHIP UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL, SUCCESSION PLANNING, AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT
Purpose: This paper aims to explore an integrated relationship between performance appraisal, succession planning, and career development in the Indian context. A very few empirical studies could be seen in identifying a relationship between the proposed variables.
Design/methodology/approach: An empirical study was conducted by employing the cross-sectional survey-based research design along with the convenience sampling method. Around, 167 questionnaires were circulated through online via Google forms. Finally, 134 responses were received from respondents having 80.23% response rate. The responses were subject to analysis using normality check, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation, model fit and multiple hierarchical regression analysis.
Findings: Results reveal that all three study variables are positively associated with each other. This study fully supports the applicability of performance appraisal, and succession planning as crucial predictors of career development more specifically in the Indian context.
Research limitations/implications: This current study is conducted using online data collection procedure, while future studies may use in-depth interview and daily diary studies.
Practical implications: This study exhibits how employee career development can be initiated through succession planning and performance appraisal. This study also suggested that the organizations which emphasize on an effective policy guideline for systematic performance appraisal will probably support the succession planning and career development.
Originality/value: Notably, no prior studies empirically investigate the proposed relationship in Indian context. Furthermore, the findings serve as a policy guideline for the performance appraisal, succession planning and career development literature in an Indian organizational setting.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Arvey, R. D., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 141-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141
Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global “war for talent”. Journal of international management, 15(3), 273-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2009.01.002
Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of applied Psychology, 84(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3
Collins, J. C., & Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don't. Random House.
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International journal of applied linguistics, 17(2), 226-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
Dalton, G. W., Thompson, P. H., & Price, R. L. (1977). The four stages of professional careers—A new look at performance by professionals. Organizational dynamics, 6(1), 19-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(77)90033-X
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Edwards, R. G., & Williams, C. J. (1998). Performance appraisal in academic libraries: minor changes or major renovation? Library Review, 47(1), 14-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242539810368982
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167488
Hauser, R. M., Sheridan, J. T., & Warren, J. R. (1999). Socioeconomic achievements of siblings in the life course: New findings from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Research on Aging, 21(2), 338-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027599212008
Hor, Y. S. (2010). YS Hor, AJ Williams, JG Checkelsky, P. Roushan, J. Seo, Q. Xu, HW Zandbergen, A. Yazdani, NP Ong, and RJ Cava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 057001 (2010). Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 057001.
Levinson, D. J. with Darrow, CN, Klein, EB, Levinson, MH, & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man's life.
Mellahi, K., Demirbag, M., & Riddle, L. (2011). Multinationals in the Middle East: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of World Business, 46(4), 406-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.001
McDonnell, A., & Collings, D. G. (2011). The identification and evaluation of talent in MNEs (Doctoral dissertation, Routledge).
Nehra, N. S., & Rangnekar, S. (2016, December). Relationship understanding between social adjustment and self-disclosure-results from the Indian power sector. In 16thGlobal Conference on Flexible Systems and Flexibility (pp. 256-266).
Nehra, N. S. (2018). Does Locus of Control Mediate the Relationship Between Personality Integration and Self-Disclosure? In Harnessing Human Capital Analytics for Competitive Advantage (pp. 245-264). IGI Global.
Nehra, N. S., & Rangnekar, S. (2017). Relationship Understanding Between Emotional Stability, Self-Disclosure and Social Adjustment. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(6), 558-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2017.1387165
Nehra, N. S., & Rangnekar, S. (2018). Linking the emotional maturity factors and self-disclosure: A study of Indian organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 255-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2017-1152
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human performance, 10(2), 85-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Pope, M. (2009). Jesse Buttrick Davis (1871–1955): Pioneer of vocational guidance in the schools. The Career Development Quarterly, 57(3), 248-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2009.tb00110.x
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Schmidt, M. W., Baldridge, K. K., Boatz, J. A., Elbert, S. T., Gordon, M. S., Jensen, J. H., ... & Windus, T. L. (1993). General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. Journal of computational chemistry, 14(11), 1347-1363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540141112
Stahl, G. K., Chua, C. H., & Pablo, A. L. (2012). Does national context affect target firm employees’ trust in acquisitions? Management International Review, 52(3), 395-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0099-7
Stahl, G. K., Chua, C. H., Caligiuri, P., Cerdin, J. L., & Taniguchi, M. (2009). Predictors of turnover intentions in learning‐driven and demand‐driven international assignments: The role of repatriation concerns, satisfaction with company support, and perceived career advancement opportunities. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 48(1), 89-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20268
Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of vocational behavior, 16(3), 282-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 326-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.004
VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied psychology, 82(3), 390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390
Copyright (c) 2021 Sheeba Ramola, Santosh Rangnekar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section