BIOLOGY TEACHER PROCEDURAL JUSTICE BASED ON SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND PERSONALITY

  • Satri Dwi Kurnia Nasution Math and Science Department, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • I Made Putrawan Environmental Education Department, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Diana Vivanti S Environmental Education Department, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Procedural Justice, School Leadership, Personality, Regression, Correlation, Survey

Abstract

Biology teacher needs to have procedural justice in delivering learning material related to school leadership and personality. That is why the objective of this research is to analyze the relationship between school leadership, personality, and procedural justice of Biology teachers. A survey used by selecting 85 Biology teachers at Karawang regency by using Simple Random Sampling (SRS). There were three instruments developed to measure school leadership (45 items) with reliability of 0.805, personality (32 items) with reliability 0.819, and procedural justice (27 items) with reliability 0.642. Data were analyzed by regressioncorrelation analysis. The result showed that school leadership and personality have a positive and significant correlation with procedural justice. These findings mean when procedural justice would be improved, factors such as school leadership and personality could be taken into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rosyada, Dede. (2007). Paradigm of democratic education: a model of community involvement in the administration of education (cet. 3). Jakarta: Kencana.

Barber M., &Mourshed, M. (2007). How The World’s The Best Performancing School Come Out On Top. New York: McKinsey and Company.

Robbins, Stephen P., Udaya, Jusuf. (1995). Organizational theory: structure, design and application (Ed. ke-3).Jakarta: Arcan.

Robbins Stephen P., & Coulter, Mary. (2013). Management, 11th Edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Jason A. Colquitt, Jeffery A. LePine& Michael J Wesson. (2015). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Greaenberg, Jerald, Baron, Robert A. (2008). Behavior in organizations (9th ed). London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Gibson, James L., Ivancevich, John M., Donnelly, James H. (2012). Organizational Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hellriegel, Don., &Slochum, Jhon W. (2009). Principles of OrganizationalBehavior, Twelfth Edition. South Western: Cengage Learning.

Elger, Donald F. (2009). Theory of Performance: Journal Faculty Development series Universityof Idaho

Hoy, Wayne K., &Miskel. Cecil G., Tarter John C. (2013). Educational Administration: theory, research, and practice (9th ed), Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Ling, Y., Abdullah, AG., Ismail, F. Feedback Environment and Job Motivation among the Middle Leaders of Educational Organizations. Journal of Education and Training 3(1), 2015,90-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v3i1.8415

Hoxha, L and ZamiraHyseni-Duraku. The Relationship between Educational Leadership and Teachers’ Self-efficacy. The European Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences 10(1), 2017, 2508-2519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.221

Published
2019-07-31
How to Cite
Nasution, S. D. K., I Made Putrawan, & Vivanti, D. (2019). BIOLOGY TEACHER PROCEDURAL JUSTICE BASED ON SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND PERSONALITY . International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 6(7), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i7.2019.425