POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION (POE): A TOOL TO INVESTIGATE THE RESIDENTS’ SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE OF HOUSING PROJECT, CASE STUDY – KANHAPUR, INDIA

  • Anamika Jiwane Department of Architecture and Interior Design, University of Bahrain, Bahrain
Keywords: Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Occupants’ Satisfaction, Housing Quality Indicators, Residential Satisfaction Factors, Sustainable Planning, Participation

Abstract

In developing countries like India, very less research has been conducted on the Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) of rural housing projects. This research aims to investigate the performance of an Eco-Village at Kanhapur, India which was designed by the Centre of Science for Villages. Research investigation was based on the occupants’ views on the physical condition of their housing units and neighborhood spaces. The study aided to determine the occupants’ housing satisfaction and thus evaluate the housing quality in the rural housing projects. The results revealed that, CSV, failed in achieving the residential satisfaction and the model of Eco-village collapsed. The housing project could offer them the shelter, but not the livable conditions on account of multiple reasons discussed in the paper. CSV never came back to the community to take the feedback on their living conditions and problems even after 10 years of occupancy. The study of this eco village led to the conclusion that POE can be utilized as a powerful tool to diagnose the residential satisfaction and thereby investigate the loopholes in the performance of housing projects.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Beamish, J.O. and Day, S. (1988). Housing Livability: Evaluation by standards, professionals and residents. Housing science 12. 239-250.
[2] Carmody, J. (2002). Post occupancy evaluation of DNR area Office Headquarters at Tower and Windom, Minnesota. Center for Sustainable building research, Minnesota.
[3] Correa, Charles. Blessings of the sky .Available at: [ accessed 14 April, 2014].
[4] Darkwa, I. (2006). Post occupancy evaluation of state-subsidized housing units in kayamandi, Stellenbosch. Masters in Consumer Science (Housing), University of Stellenbosch.
[5] Huizanga, C., Zagerus, L., rens, E., and Lehreer, D., (2003). Measuring indoor environmental quality: A webbsaded occupant survey. Center for the Built environment, Berkeley, Wurster hall.
[6] Idrus, N., & Ho, C. S. (2008). Affordable And Quality Housing Through The Low Cost Housing Provision In Malaysia. In Seminar of Sustainable Development and Governance, Department of Civil Engineering, and Architecture, Toyohashi University of Technology, 26 June 2008 (pp. 1–21).
[7] Ilesanmi, AdetokunboOluwole, 2010. Post-occupancy evaluation and residents’ satisfaction with public housing in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Building Appraisal.Vol.6, pp153–169.
[8] Jiboye A.D., 2012. Post-occupancy evaluation of residential satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria: Feedback for residential improvement. Frontiers of Architectural Research. Volume 1, Issue 3, September 2012, pp 236-243.
[9] Kasim, R., Ishiyaku, B. and Harir, A.I. (2014). Performance criteria for public housing evaluation in developing countries (Case Study of Gombe Metropolis, Nigeria). Available at:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5933/bf05bc8609cd2bf10e3497864c99e83d7d8a.pdf
[10] Loftness, V., Aziz, A., Choi, J., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K., Atkinson, M., &Heerwagen, J. (2009). The value of post-occupancy evaluation for building occupants and facility managers. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(4), 249– 268. doi:10.3763/inbi.2009.SI04
[11] McWatt, A.M. (2014). A Critical Analysis of Robert Pirsig’s Metaphysics of Quality. Available at: https://cdn.website-editor.net/90e0cb600d8146f9af85b88f0c2f8fb2/files/uploaded/A.McWatt-PhD%2520Thesis%2520June%25202011%2520pp.pdf
[12] Mohit, M.A. and Raja, K.A.M.M. (2014). Residential satisfaction- concept, theories and empirical studies. Planning Malaysia: urban Planning and Local Governance. Vol. III (2014), pp. 47-66.
[13] Morris, E.W. and Winter, M.(1978). Housing, family and society. New York: John Wiley and sons.
[14] Salleh, A.G., 2008. Neighborhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malysia, 32. Habitat international. 485-493.
[15] Preiser, WF., Rabinowitz, HZ, and White, ET., (1988) Pot occupancy evaluation. New York. Van NostrandRreinhold.
[16] Sanoff, H. ,1990. Participatory Design, Theory and Techniques. North Carolina: Book Masters.
[17] Southworth, M., &Cranz, G. (2012). People in the Design of Urban Places. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4),461–465. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13574809.2012.720757
[18] Wates N, Knevitt C., 1987. Community architecture: How people are creating their own environment. London: Penguin Books.
[19] Watson, C. (2003). Review of Building quality using post-occupancy evaluation. Journal of Program Educational Buildings. 35:1-5.
[20] Wish, N.B. (1986). Are we really measuring quality of life? American Journal of economics and Sociology, 45(10), Pp 93-99.
Published
2021-10-13
How to Cite
Jiwane, A. (2021). POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION (POE): A TOOL TO INVESTIGATE THE RESIDENTS’ SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE OF HOUSING PROJECT, CASE STUDY – KANHAPUR, INDIA. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 8(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v8.i10.2021.1041