FACULTY MENTORING PROGRAMS AT ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE MENTORING PROGRAMS
Keywords:Faculty Mentors, and Mentoring
Teaching is the oldest profession in the world. Mentoring program for faculty only began as recently as the 1970’s. While there are many types of mentoring programs, there is a clear need for more mentoring programs as the demographics of faculty have changed. Single parent faculty, women, minorities and foreign faculty need mentoring programs. Research has shown that there is a clear link between mentoring programs and retention of faculty. Furthermore, mentoring programs are needed at academic institutions and this paper explains why they are needed and what types of mentoring programs could be implemented to retain faculty.
Abdul-Raheem, J. (2016). Faculty diversity and tenure in higher education. Journal of Cultural Diversity. 23 (2), 53-56.
Beech, B., Calles-Escandon, J.,Hairston, K., Langdon, S., Latham-Sadler, B., and Bell, R. (2013). Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine. 88(4), 541-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3
Chang, S. Morahan, P., Magrane, D., Helitzer, D., Young Lee, H., Newbill, S., Peng, H., Guindani, M., & Cardinali, G. (2015). Retaining faculty in academic medicine: The impact of career development programs for women. Journal of Women’s Health. 25(7). Doi: 10.1089/wh.2015.5608.
Feldman, M. (2017). Faculty Mentoring Toolkit. UCSF Campus Council on Faculty Life.
Fountain, J., & Newcomer, K. (2016). Developing and sustain effective faculty mentoring programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 22(4), 483-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002262
Gandhi, M. & Johnson, M. (2016). Creating more effective mentors: Mentoring the mentor. AIDS Behavior: Springer Science. 20, 294-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1364-3
Golbeck, A. (2017). Mentoring faculty women in statistics: Exploring challenges and opportunities for leadership development. The American Statistician. 71(1), 47-54. Doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1255658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1255658
Grisso, J., Sammel, M., Rubenstein, A., Speck, R., Conant, E., Scott, P., Tuton, L., Westring, A., Friedman, S., & Abbuhl, Sl. (2017). Journal of Women’s Health. 26(5) doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.6025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6025
Hammer, T., Trepal, H., & Speedlin, S. (2014). Five relational strategies for mentoring female faculty. Adultspan Journal. 13(1), 4-14. Doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0029.2014.000222.x
Hoffman, E.M. (2014). Faculty and student relationships: Context matters. College Teaching, 62, 13-19. Doi: 10.1080/87567555.2013.817379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.817379
Humbred, B. & Rouse, E. (2016). Seeing you in me and me in you: Personal identification in the phases of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 435-455. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0203
Kohn, H. (2014). A mentoring program to help junior faculty members achieve scholarship success.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 78(2), 29, 1-6.
Louis, D.A. (2015). Cross-Cultural peer mentoring: One approach to enhancing white faculty adjustment at black colleges. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(2), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v17i2.900
Manci, K. & Lee, K. (2016). Mentoring East Asian women science and engineering faculty. The Ohio Journal of Science. 116(2), 6-28.
Mee, S., Herdklotz, C., Canale, A. (2019). Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning. 13(1/2) 74-87. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Nayman, S. (2013). 6 Characteristics the best mentors have in common. Government Executive, April. 1-2.
Noble, A. (2017). Why Christian colleges emphasize mentorship. Christianity Today. 73-88.
O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., & Nyunt, G. (2017). Constrained choices: A view of campus service inequality from annual faculty reports. The Journal of Higher Education. 88(5), 672-700. doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.125312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257312
Poor, C. & Brown, S. (2013). Increasing retention of women in engineering at WSU: A model for a women’s mentoring program. College Student Journal. 421-428.
Popper, A. (2007). Mentoring junior faculty, a guide for faculty mentors (and mentees) in the College of Chemical and Life Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.life.umd.edu/faculty/mentoring.pdf. 1-12.
Reis, R., Strage, A, & Summit, J. (2014). A cross-institution mentoring program. Change. JulyAugust. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2014.925765
Savage, H., Karp, R., & Logue, R. (2004). Faculty mentorship at colleges and universities. College Teaching. 52(1), 21-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.1.21-24
Sheridan, L., Murdoch, N., & Harder, E. (2015). Assessing mentoring culture: Faculty and staff perceptions, gaps and strengths. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 45(4), 423-439.
Trevino, L., Balken, D., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2017). How “doing gender” leads to gender imbalances in the higher ranks in colleges of business (and how to undo gender). Academy of Management Learning and Education. 16(3).439-453. doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0053
Wild, L., Canale, A., & Herdklotz, C. (2017). The power of many: Mentoring networks for growth and development. College & University. 92(2), 37-41.
Williams, T., Layne, M., & Ice, P. (2014). Online faculty perceptions of effective faculty mentoring: A qualitative study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration
How to Cite
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section